Tag Archives: paid content

Business Insider: FT deal with Foursquare will offer free subscriptions

The Financial Times is working with Foursquare to provide free subscriptions to users of the location-based social networking site who “check in” to selected locations, Business Insider reports.

The deal will target younger readers, for example by featuring coffee shops and other spots located close to universities and business schools, who may be turned off by the rates for a premium subscription to FT.com.

[T]he Foursquare deal opens the FT up beyond their typical straight-laced business subscribers, and attempts to get a decidedly younger, more web-savvy potential consumer interacting with their brand.

Full story at this link…

SFN Blog: Independent News & Media trials paid content on Irish regionals

Last week Independent News & Media (INM) introduced a new freemium model to 13 of its regional newspaper websites in Ireland.

Much content on the sites will remain free, but charges will be introduced for iPhone apps, digital editions and online subscriptions, where there will be a choice between micropayments per article, bundles and time-based subscriptions.

Full story at this link…

Introduction to the new premium content sections at this link, via The Kerryman’s website, and a letter about the changes from group editor Declan Malone here.

paidContent:UK: FT confirms new additions to subscription model

The Financial Times has confirmed it will add a new day pass and weekly pass, powered by online payment system Pay Pal, as part of its online access model.

While the pass is different from the FT’s direct payment for an anual subscription, as paidContent:UK points out this isn’t quite a move to micropayments.

But FT CEO John Ridding did comment on the potential for micropayments to support an annual subscription while speaking on the new plans at the FT’s Digital Media and Broadcasting conference.

Full story at this link…

Tech Watch: Future to launch paid-for ‘games show’ on PlayStation

Future Publishing will launch FirstPlay – a games show delivered directly to PS3 consoles. The show will feature video reviews, details of new releases and a downloads section and will be priced at 99p per weekly episode or £8.99 for a three-month subscription, reports Tech Watch.

There will be six ad slots in the show, a trailer of which is available on the Future website.

Full story at this link…

SFN Blog: French news sites to erect pay walls

French news sites L’Express and Le Figaro will follow in the footsteps of the New York Times and erect pay walls for their websites.

A report from Le Monde suggests the new models could be introduced next month for Le Figaro and late this year for L’Express.

Full post at this link…

Felix Salmon: ‘Online subscription revenues won’t make newspapers profitable again’

Felix Salmon responds to John Gapper’s Financial Times column Charge for news or bleed red ink, in which Gapper suggests that while only a small number of New York Times readers may sign up for subscriptions under its forthcoming charging model, this would provide a significant revenue boost.

Salmon goes ‘through the numbers’ and writes:

With the New York Times Company making the best part of $300 million a year from online advertising, it’s hard to see that the extra revenue boost would really be worth it.

The point here is that with the powerhouse NYTimes.com site front and center, the New York Times Company as a whole is a major online media player, serving up billions of high-prestige page views and building strong relationships with every major online advertiser and media buyer in the country. Even under the most optimistic scenario, a majority of the NYT’s loyal readers will desert it when it moves to a paywall. And with those readers gone, media buyers are by no means guaranteed to stick around.

Full story at this link….

Confirmed: New York Times website will introduce FT-style charging system

The “will they, won’t they” speculation has ended – the New York Times has confirmed it will bring in a new online charging model for its website from early 2011.

The new system will ape that of the Financial Times’ website and give readers a certain number of articles free each month, after which limit they will be charged a flat fee for unlimited access.

“[E]xecutives of The New York Times Company said they could not yet answer fundamental questions about the plan, like how much it would cost or what the limit would be on free reading. They stressed that the amount of free access could change with time, in response to economic conditions and reader demand,” reports the Times’ own media section.

Print edition subscribers will receive full access to the website.

The system will be created from scratch by the Times, which looked at other charging options before settling on a ‘metered’ system.

According to Nielsen, the Times is the most popular US newspaper website in terms of traffic. Its introduction of a subscription model will be watched by other players with keen interest, particularly as this is not the first time the title has charged for online access. In 2007 it stopped its two-year-old TimesSelect service that charged for viewing editorials and columns.

Daily Intel: New York Times to bring back pay wall?

Update: New York Times confirms it will bring in new charging system from January 2011.

Having already pioneered and seemingly abandoned charging for its website, is the New York Times about to introduce a new pay wall or Financial Times style metering system for its website?

According to the Daily Intel, a new access model will be brought in within a matter of weeks. (Note that in November last year a pay wall decision for the times was also scheduled for “within weeks”, but didn’t emerge.)

Full story at this link…

On paidContent.org, James McQuivey, an analyst at Forrester Research, looks at how paid content on NYTimes.com might work and what the Times should be looking at when building a wall.

But, McQuivey adds:

Notice that this advice is directed to NYTimes.com and nobody else. Because there is no other newspaper that we believe can pull this off at this time, even though a majority of newspaper editors are considering it.

Fortune: Stratfor – an alternative journalism model?

Except it’s not journalism:

George Friedman is not in the business of journalism. He wants to make that clear. But while traditional media organizations are on the decline, Stratfor, the Austin, Texas-based global intelligence company he started in 1996, is on the rise as readers look for alternatives to the ailing international sections of their daily papers.

(…) Stratfor’s big bet is that while news organisations may be declining, people still need to understand the news and they’ll be willing to pay for that analysis.

Full post at this link…

Pay walls for news will produce ‘more corpses than successes’, says report

With pay walls (or the discussion of) popping up right, left and centre in newsrooms at the moment, a new report from business and technology analysis firm Ovum won’t allay the fears of many media executives.

“Paywall experiments by traditional media in 2010 are virtually guaranteed to produce more corpses than successes,” it states in the opening line.

If the trend towards pay walls persists, there will be separation of “wheat from the chaff” when it comes to “premium” content, suggests the report:

The lessons from the web are simple; if content is not highly differentiated, or information premium and tradable, search technologies such as Google exist to provide an access channel to a zero cost source of identical or comparable content. The pay wall will act as a market-driven audit tool for what content is and is not premium and 2010 will see news and media organisations reassess their view of the online value of their content portfolios.

But online video and catch-up TV services have a greater opportunity to demand a pay-per-view premium, the report adds.

More happily for Ovum’s industry, the firm forecasts that paid content models will be a boost to service and technology vendors looking to create new platforms/payment systems and technologies rather than the media companies implementing them.

Ovum’s report suggests that Apple’s forthcoming Tablet technology could marry together the publishers hopes for paid content and the capabilities of the technology vendors:

Apple has demonstrated for the music industry that the combination of strong media retail platform with a consistent user experience across multiple, integrated devices can draw consumers away from free, but less elegant consumption models.

The news industry will be hoping that Apple can deliver a similar experience in 2010. If it fails to deliver, radical restructuring of the news media supply chain will be needed.