Here are the responses given by Rebekah Brooks, James Murdoch and Rupert Murdoch to chairman of the culture, media and sport committee John Whittingdale, who invited them to give evidence next week on phone hacking.
Brooks has accepted an invitation to appear before the committee on Tuesday.
Rebekah Brooks:
Dear John,
Thank you for your letter of 12 July, on behalf of the committee, inviting me to give evidence to you on 19 July.
I am writing to confirm that I am available to appear before the committee on that date and welcome the opportunity to do so.
As you will be aware, the Metropolitan police investigation into illegal voicemail interception continues and we are fully cooperating with that. Aspects of the work to which your committee may wish to refer are likely to be relevant to that investigation. Indeed, the police have already asked us specifically to provide information about those matters.
I understand that various select committees have approached the police over time in relation to this and other cases. The police’s position has been to co-operate where this did not directly impact on the investigation in question. In those cases where it did potentially impact, the police have historically declined to comment at that stage. Our understanding is that this approach has not been challenged. Given that we are in the midst of an investigation, and we do not want to prejudice it, I hope you will understand why we feel it would not be appropriate to respond to such questions at present in order to be consistent with [the] police’s approach, and that as a result this may prevent me from discussing these matters in detail.
I hope this is of help, and look forward to hearing from you to discuss exact timings and other details.
Yours sincerely,
Rebekah Brooks
Rupert Murdoch:
Dear John,
Thank you for your letter of 12 July, on behalf of the committee, inviting me to give evidence to you on 19 July.
Unfortunately, I am not available to attend the session you have planned next Tuesday. However, I am fully prepared to give evidence to the forthcoming judge-led public inquiry and I will be taking steps to notify those conducting the inquiry of my willingness to do so. Having done this, I would be happy to discuss with you how best to give evidence to your committee.
I hope this is of help.
Yours sincerely,
Rupert Murdoch
James Murdoch:
Dear John
Thank you for your letter of 12 July, on behalf of the committee, inviting me to give evidence to you on 19 July.
Unfortunately I am not available to attend the session you have planned next Tuesday.
However, I would be pleased to give evidence to your committee on either the 10 or 11 August. Naturally, if neither of these proves suitable I would be willing to consider any alternative dates you suggest.
I hope this is of help to the committee.
Yours sincerely,
James Murdoch
Given the responses from Rupert and James Murdoch the committee decided it will issue summons for them to appear on Tuesday. It is currently unclear what steps could and would be taken if they are declined.