Category Archives: Search

paidContent:UK: Times Online blocks news aggregator Meltwater

Following its decision in January to block the NewsNow news monitoring site, Times Online has blocked fellow news aggregator Meltwater.

Meltwater is the only aggregation service that has not complied with a new system introduced by the Newspaper Licensing Agency (NLA) at the start of 2010, which includes charging sites that crawl newspaper websites and use this information as part of a commercial service to clients.

Meltwater is taking the NLA to a copyright tribunal and on Monday was told its challenge would go ahead with a procedural hearing in June 2010 and a trial in February 2011.

Full story at this link…

Guardian: Tax Google for carrying news, says report

Control of the media is dominated by a handful of publishers and broadcasters and the proceeds of tax for sites, such as Google, that carry news, but do not produce it, should go to local newspapers, a new report will say this week.

The report argues for levies to promote new media and encourage a diversity of news sources. Recycling money in this way, say the authors, is not new for Britain. Google could generate £100m a year for cash-starved media if it was taxed for the content it distributes.

In Making a Good Society, the report from the Commission of Inquiry into the Future of Civil Society, which will be published this week, the idea of charitable funding for news gathering is also discussed.

Full story at this link…

This is not the first time that a system of levies has been discussed – a joint National Union of Journalists (NUJ) and BECTU study last year proposed a similar system of taxation for internet service providers and mobile network operators to support public service broadcasting.

TechCrunch: Newspapers have never made much money from news, says Google’s chief economist

TechCrunch has a summary of a presentation by Google’s chief economist, Hal Varian, on the decline of newspaper advertising revenues.

“The fact of the matter is that newspapers have never made much money from news,” says Varian. They make money from “special interest sections on topics such as Automotive, Travel, Home & Garden, Food & Drink, and so on.” The problem is that on the web, other niche sites which cater to those categories are a click away, leaving the newspapers with sections which are harder to sell ads against, such as sports, news, and local.

Full post at this link…

Presentation below:

030910 Hal Varian FTC Preso

Digits Blog: AP stories come back to Google News

Stories from the Associated Press (AP) are once more appearing on Google’s News search engine, ending a near seven-week absence from the site.

The two parties have been negotiating a licensing agreement and talks were stalled by the AP’s monitoring of its articles to and through Google News, the Wall Street Journal’s Digits blog reports.

Google and AP said negotiations on an agreement were ongoing despite the return of AP stories.

Full post at this link…

Google News to ‘recrawl’ for story changes

Google News introduced a new recrawl feature this week, which allows the search engine to revisit news articles for changes – most frequently on the first day after Google finds them.

For readers, this feature is intended to reduce the number of outdated headlines and dead links you might find. And for publishers, rest assured that we’ll be back to find your latest stories and updates as soon as we can.

Full post at this link…

SearchEngineLand.com: New AP stories no longer appearing in Google News

New Associated Press (AP) stories, hosted by Google itself, are no longer appearing in Google News, reports Danny Sullivan for SearchEngineLand.com.

It’s true. Since Dec. 24, Google has no longer added new AP content, something the company confirmed with me today [Friday]. I received this statement:

“We have a licensing agreement with the Associated Press that permits us to host its content on Google properties such as Google News. Some of that content is still available today. At the moment we’re not adding new hosted content from the AP.”

So why not? The statement doesn’t explain. But it’s reasonable to assume it’s related to the ongoing talks between Google and the Associated Press.

Full post at this link…

(via paidContent.org)

Editors Weblog: French government considering ‘Google tax’

The Editors Weblog rounds up reports in the French media of plans to tax Google and other internet giants, including AOL, Microsoft and Facebook.

The tax would fund government proposals to support content creators online and reflects complaints from music and news organisations that search engines and aggregators are making money from free use of their content online.

The recommendation was made as part of the Zelnik report on the online content and advertising industries. French President Nicolas Sarkozy has said he backs some of the proposals, but has made no specific mention of the “Google tax”, according to this Boston.com report.

The French government has taken active steps to help the print and online news industries with schemes such as free newspapers for young readers. Similar fees have previously been proposed for internet service providers by leading editors.

The “Google tax” proposed is reminiscent of a similar scheme suggested by the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) in the UK, which proposed introducing levies for aggregators.

Full story at this link…

Google Public Policy Blog: Google’s open manifesto – what does it mean for publishers?

Some big promises from the search giant in this manifesto posted to its public policy blog yesterday. In The meaning of open, Joshua Rosenberg, senior vice president of product management, says openness as a company and on the web has no clear definition:

The topic of open seems to be coming up a lot lately at Google. I’ve been in meetings where we’re discussing a product and someone says something to the effect that we should be more open. Then a debate ensues which reveals that even though most everyone in the room believes in open we don’t necessarily agree on what it means in practice.

He then goes on to describe what open means for Google’s business – and how the search engine is attempting to become more transparent – a regular sticking point for the newspaper and publishing industry, which have criticised the secrecy surrounding the search engine’s online practices.

Rosenberg also levels another criticism:

We are often attacked for being too big, but sometimes being bigger allows us to take on the impossible.

Whether this will be enough to sate other players (namely newspapers) is uncertain, but it seems Google is making yet more attempts, following its recent launches such as Fast Flip and alternative indexing, to make 2010 the year of olive branches and openness.

Full post at this link…

TechCrunch: Google to acquire Yelp – a missed opportunity for local news?

Google will buy local business reviews site Yelp for at least $500 million, according to TechCrunch.

The search giant is already building a directory of local businesses with its Place Pages, which makes use of its maps and local search tools. Yelp already has data on this and ratings and reviews of local businesses from users.

As media blogger and author Jeff Jarvis points out via Twitter, Google can strengthen its positioning in the local advertising market and has spotted an opportunity in online communities around local business that other media, including newspapers, may have missed.

Full story at this link…

Kevin Kelleher: ‘Does Google even understand what news is?’

Read on, only if you can bear any more Google-Murdoch discussion. Writing on GigaOM.com, Kevin Kelleher critiques Google CEO Eric Schmidt’s recent Wall Street Journal piece on Google and news. Kelleher argues that personalised news is the opposite of what news should be:

Google’s algorithms are very handy for shopping or entertainment recommendations. But I don’t like it ‘personalising’ news. Serving readers news based on what they’ve read can lead to a kind of tunnel vision where they’re insulated from the dissenting views and unpleasant truths.

Some of GigaOM’s commenters interpreted Schmidt’s piece very differently: “I imagined he was talking about personalising the news the way that Google News already does… not by excluding specific stories that might make you uncomfortable, but by allowing you to focus on the types of stories you find interesting,” writes one. Full post at this link…