An MP urged the government to set aside time for a Commons debate on gagging orders today, suggesting there are rumours circulating that another member of Parliament has taken out a super-injunction to prevent discussion of their activities, Jon Slattery reports in this blog post.
The allegation was made in the Commons as MPs discussed future Parliamentary business – including whether to debate judge-made privacy laws and gagging orders.
Conservative MP for Hendon, Matthew Offord reportedly said:
“Is the Leader of the House aware of the anomaly this creates if, as has been rumoured, a member of this place seeks a super-injunction to prevent discussion of their activities?”
Leader of the House Sir George Young was said to reply that it was “a very important issue about how we balance on the one hand an individual’s right to privacy and, on the other hand, the freedom of expression and transparency”.
He said the government would wait for the report from Lord Neuberger’s special committee on the issue, before deciding the next step.
“It may then be appropriate for the House to have a debate on this important issue,” he added.
- ‘Super injunctions’ parliamentary debate: kicks off 2.30 pm
- Independent: Poll finds judges ‘too ready’ to gag newspapers
- BBC CoJo: When a super injunction is not a super injunction
- John Bercow calls the Daily Mail a ‘sexist, racist, bigoted, comic’
- Richard Wilson: ‘No one knows how many secret super-injunctions are currently in force’