The media has recently been granted increased access to the proceedings of the court, which makes decisions in the cases of people deemed vulnerable or unable to make decisions for themselves, but on the rare occasions that the media is granted access judges still decide on a case-by-cases what they can have access to and report on, and at what stages of a case.
Wall told the Guardian:
It seems to me a matter of public interest. The public is, after all, entitled to know what’s going on. Locking up a mentally disabled person is a very serious thing to do and we don’t want people quietly locked up in private.
The decision about opening up the court is very fraught and people have very strong views. My entirely personal view is that provided we can protect the confidentiality of litigants and their families, there’s not a reason we can’t hear the cases in the presence of the media.
- Independent in High Court to challenge closed court cases
- BBC: West Midlands Police Tweet from court
- Privacy injunction statistics published by Ministry of Justice as part of new pilot scheme
- Inforrm Blog: William Hague reports ‘postively damaging to public interest’
- Observer seeks to distinguish ‘Operation Motorman’ from the phone-hacking scandal