David Higgerson, head of multimedia at Trinity Mirror, has posed some interesting questions on what the William Hague and Christopher Myers story means for the power, image and responsibilities of the blogging community.
The fact Hague felt the need to release the statement he did, and that Myers felt the need to stand down, shows the influence political bloggers have within the Westminster village. (…) Does Hague’s response suggest that he and his colleague over-weighed the true impact of what is written on blogs for the wider public? It’s certainly the mother of all statements, and there’s a danger it sets a new precedent for denying rumours. Will we now see a glut of rumours around the internet in the knowledge that a denial is likely to follow?
And, he adds, if recent events do show political bloggers are becoming increasingly influential, should we now be addressing the introduction of greater responsibilities for such a powerful online community?
- Inforrm Blog: William Hague reports ‘postively damaging to public interest’
- Technorati buys blogging community Blogcritics.org
- Online commenters are like ‘particularly aggressive sub-editors’ says Guardian’s Andrew Sparrow
- ConservativeHome blogger granted lobby pass
- Washingtonpost.com: Bloggers break news of Sarah Palin’s pregnant daughter