The effects of English libel law on the reporting of parliamentary proceedings will be debated in the House of Commons today at 14.30 pm.
Liberal Democrat MP Dr Evan Harris secured the debate, following the legal row between the Guardian and Trafigura’s lawyers, Carter-Ruck.
Although a ‘super-injunction’ that stopped the Guardian reporting – or mentioning – the suppressed Minton Report was eventually lifted, it had prevented the Guardian reporting an MP’s question tabled for Parliament.
Carter-Ruck twice issued letters to the House, in regards to the case: firstly in response to media reports on how the firm was trying to ‘gag’ Parliament; secondly, indicating that the case could be ‘sub judice‘. On Friday Carter-Ruck abandoned its injunction and on Saturday the Guardian reported the draft report that Trafigura had battled so hard to keep secret. On Sunday Guardian.co.uk reported that the MPs’ debate would go ahead.
Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger has dissected the injunction here for us on Guardian.co.uk although the document had already been made available by the Norwegian Broadcasting Corporation (NRK) prior to the injunction being lifted.
The Times had also been issued with the same injunction, Wikileaks reported.
- Journalism.co.uk: Trafigura and the Minton Report: ‘Super injunction’ was lifted after the horse had bolted
- Journalism.co.uk Trafigura/Guardian coverage at this link
- Guardian editor Alan Rusbridger on Trafigura’s ‘own goal’
- Malcolm Coles: Carter Ruck’s new attempt to gag Parliament
- Carter-Ruck abandons attempt to gag Guardian on Trafigura question
- Trafigura update: Jack Straw to examine use of ‘super injunctions’
- ‘Firms like Carter-Ruck have become expert at pressing certain legal buttons,’ says David Leigh