Science writer Simon Singh, who is currently being sued by the British Chiropractic Association (BCA) is going to court today to challenge Justice Eady’s earlier ruling on the case, made in May 2009.
It boils down to whether Singh’s article published in the Guardian in April 2008 about the effectiveness of chiropractic treatments for children, was comment (as Singh argues) or a statement of fact (as Eady first ruled), in the eyes of the law.
The Court of Appeal hearing – scheduled for 10:30am – “is a rare opportunity to clarify the right to ‘fair comment’, one of the few defences available in a libel action”, says the Libel Reform campaign, backed by the Sense About Science organisation, in a statement.
It said it will be “one of the most significant trials for free speech and science this year”, as Singh’s case goes before the Lord Chief Justice, the Master of the Rolls and Lord Justice Sedley.
Disclaimer: Journalism.co.uk has pledged its support to the ongoing Libel Reform campaign and petition.
- Simon Singh update: senior judge baffled by ‘artificiality’ of case
- The Simon Singh appeal judgement in full
- #SinghBCA: BCA speaks – why the ‘time is right’ to drop libel case against Simon Singh
- Index on Censorship: Simon Singh wins leave to appeal in BCA libel case
- #SinghBCA: British Chiropractic Association drops libel case against Simon Singh