The Wall Street Journal’s rules of conduct were zipping around yesterday, inspiring comments from Jeff Jarvis, and others. Matthew Ingram, over at the Nieman Journalism Lab, agrees with Jarvis that the restrictions are too tight.
“Obviously, a newspaper doesn’t want to give away the store and tell everyone what stories it is working on, or tip its hand in a variety of other ways, and probably doesn’t want to go into detail about how certain stories emerged (especially if it was a fortuitous accident). But Jarvis is right that talking about stories that are under way can also have tremendous benefits,” Ingram writes.
- Nieman Journalism Lab: Why the NYT was wrong to keep quiet about Rohde’s kidnap
- Jarvis reflects on name-calling in the blogground
- Comment Is Free: Jarvis vs Tomasky: what rules for citizen journalists?
- Twitter workshop for journalists shared – courtesy of Globe & Mail’s Matthew Ingram
- Archant’s director of business development, Ian Davies dies in plane crash