<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Editors&#039; Blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk &#187; WSJ.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/tag/wsjcom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Paywall subscribers worth a quarter of print counterparts, claims survey</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/03/paywall-subscribers-worth-a-quarter-of-print-counterparts-claims-survey/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/03/paywall-subscribers-worth-a-quarter-of-print-counterparts-claims-survey/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:37:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Rachel McAthy</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Enders Analysis]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[paywalls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[revenues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=25907</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet With TheTimes.co.uk and SundayTimes.co.uk still not releasing traffic figures through the Audit Bureau of Circulations, we can&#8217;t yet see the impact of the paywall in terms of browser figures. But according to research published by Enders Analysis, the value of a paywall subscriber is only a fraction of a print reader. The research, carried [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/03/paywall-subscribers-worth-a-quarter-of-print-counterparts-claims-survey/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Paywall subscribers worth a quarter of print counterparts, claims survey">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>With TheTimes.co.uk and SundayTimes.co.uk still not releasing traffic figures through the Audit Bureau of Circulations, we can&#8217;t yet see the impact of the paywall in terms of browser figures. But <a title="Enders Analysis" href="http://www.endersanalysis.com/aboutus/" target="_blank">according to research published by Enders Analysis</a>, the value of a paywall subscriber is only a fraction of a print reader.</p>
<p>The research, carried out by Benedict Evans, compared annual incomes from subscribers for paywalled newspapers <a title="TheTimes.co.uk" href="www.thetimes.co.uk" target="_blank">TheTimes.co.uk</a> and <a title="wsj.com" href="www.wsj.com" target="_blank">WSJ.com</a> with those for UK quality daily papers.</p>
<p>The main findings quoted online are as follows:</p>
<blockquote><p>A newspaper paywall subscriber is worth only a quarter to a third of a print buyer: even if every single print buyer is successfully converted to the paywall, newspapers will still face a basic problem of scale.</p>
<p>Paywalls will not be able to compensate for lower revenue per reader by expanding the audience for paid news, due to the long term decline of circulation, free online news, 24-hour broadcast news and free-sheets.</p>
<p>Future change will be radical: publishers may need to consider producing a newspaper its loyal readers recognise and value with just 200 rather than 500 journalists.</p></blockquote>
<p><a title="Paidcontent:UK" href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-analyst-paywall-subscribers-worth-a-quarter-of-print-readers/" target="_blank">Hatip: paidContentUK</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/03/30/should-we-pay-the-wall-to-maintain-quality-journalism/" rel="bookmark" title="March 30, 2011">Should we &#8216;pay the wall&#8217; to maintain quality journalism?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/08/forbes-com-circulation-revenue-is-more-stable-than-paywalls-says-scripps-senior-vp/" rel="bookmark" title="February 8, 2010">Forbes.com: Circulation revenue is more stable than paywalls, says Scripps senior VP</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/08/27/paidcontentuk-newsagents-see-14-per-cent-decline-in-newspaper-revenue-over-a-decade/" rel="bookmark" title="August 27, 2010">paidContent:UK: Newsagents see 14 per cent decline in newspaper revenue over a decade</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/07/02/the-times-and-sunday-times-what-a-paywall-looks-like/" rel="bookmark" title="July 2, 2010">The Times and Sunday Times: What a paywall looks like</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/03/wan-2008-print-and-online-newspapers-on-the-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="June 3, 2008">WAN 2008: Print and online newspapers on the rise</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.528 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/03/paywall-subscribers-worth-a-quarter-of-print-counterparts-claims-survey/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ confirms paid-for access to news on mobile</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/17/wsj-confirms-paid-for-access-to-news-on-mobile/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/17/wsj-confirms-paid-for-access-to-news-on-mobile/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Sep 2009 14:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apple iPod Touch Portable Audio Device]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon McLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[iPhone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corp]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online subscribers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Smartphone]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[touch devices]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=14112</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet News Corp&#8217;s Dow Jones has confirmed speculation from earlier this week and announced that the Wall Street Journal will now charge for full access to its content via Blackberry, iPhone and iPod touch devices. According to a press release, the WSJ applications will remain free to download for each device and continue to offer [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/17/wsj-confirms-paid-for-access-to-news-on-mobile/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="WSJ confirms paid-for access to news on mobile">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/09/16/paidcontent-wsj-ready-to-start-charging-for-mobile-apps/" target="_blank">News Corp&#8217;s Dow Jones has confirmed speculation from earlier this week</a> and announced that the Wall Street Journal will now charge for full access to its content via Blackberry, iPhone and iPod touch devices.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.dowjones.com/Pressroom/PressReleases/Other/US/2009/0917_US_TheWallStreetJournal_3997.htm" target="_blank">According to a press release</a>, the WSJ applications will remain free to download for each device and continue to offer a mixture of free and subscription content.</p>
<p>The new access model will be introduced from October 24 and hopes to expand the paying audience for Dow Jones&#8217; content by highlighting the specialist, time-sensitive nature of its news.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Our new mobile subscription model will enable us to continue to invest in the world&#8217;s most essential news content and deliver it to our subscribers wherever and whenever they want it,&#8221; said Gordon McLeod, president of the Wall Street Journal digital network, in the release.</p>
<p>&#8220;This transition also reinforces the value of our content on mobile, just as we&#8217;ve done online for more than a decade.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Full access to the site from these applications will cost $2 per week for a mobile-only subscription. A subscription to mobile and the WSJ in print or online will cost $1 a week.</p>
<p>Print and online subscribers will have free access to content via the smartphone apps.</p>
<p>Full access to the site&#8217;s mobile site will only be granted to WSJ.com subscribers, the release added.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/535850.php" target="_blank">Today UK website the Spectator announced it would introduced a range of subscription packages</a> for its website with immediate effect.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/25/ipad-news-would-you-pay-more/" rel="bookmark" title="March 25, 2010">iPad news: would you pay more?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/10/18/sydney-morning-herald-the-australian-to-reveal-paywall-details-this-week/" rel="bookmark" title="October 18, 2011">Sydney Morning Herald: The Australian to reveal paywall details this week</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/15/mobile-plans-for-london-evening-standard-announced-at-mobile-world-congress/" rel="bookmark" title="February 15, 2010">Mobile plans for London Evening Standard announced at Mobile World Congress</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/01/25/rumour-mill-cranks-up-over-upcoming-new-york-times-paywall/" rel="bookmark" title="January 25, 2011">Rumour mill cranks up over upcoming New York Times &#8216;paywall&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/26/times-and-sunday-times-will-be-paywalled-from-june-1-a-day/" rel="bookmark" title="March 26, 2010">Times and Sunday Times will be paywalled from June &#8211; £1 a day</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.541 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/17/wsj-confirms-paid-for-access-to-news-on-mobile/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Grueskin: &#8216;What would Google do about newspapers?&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/08/bill-grueskin-what-would-google-do-about-newspapers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/08/bill-grueskin-what-would-google-do-about-newspapers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 May 2009 09:47:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill grueskin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Columbia University]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[dean]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managing Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marissa Mayer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[School of Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search products]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[senate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice-president of search products and user experience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=10091</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Guest blogging on Reflections of a Newsosaur, Bill Grueskin, the academic dean of the School of Journalism at Columbia University and former managing editor of WSJ.Com, offers his translation of comments by the Google&#8217;s vice-president of search products and user experience, Marissa Mayer, to the Senate commerce subcommittee hearing. &#8220;Her elliptical comments at a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/08/bill-grueskin-what-would-google-do-about-newspapers/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Bill Grueskin: &#8216;What would Google do about newspapers?&#8217;">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Guest blogging on Reflections of a Newsosaur, Bill Grueskin, the academic dean of the School of Journalism at Columbia University and former managing editor of WSJ.Com, offers his translation of comments by the Google&#8217;s vice-president of search products and user experience, Marissa Mayer, to the Senate commerce subcommittee hearing. </p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Her elliptical comments at a congressional hearing on the sorry state of the newspaper industry revolved around a message that seemed to add up to: &#8216;Lotsa luck, fellas.&#8217;&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2009/05/what-would-google-do-about-newspapers.html" target="_blank">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/12/fast-company-who-are-the-most-influential-women-in-web-20/" rel="bookmark" title="November 12, 2008">Fast Company: Who are the most influential women in Web 2.0?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/09/washington-post-using-apture-for-article-links/" rel="bookmark" title="December 9, 2008">Washington Post using Apture for article links</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/24/cnn-are-you-a-newspaper-person-asks-ireport/" rel="bookmark" title="March 24, 2009">CNN: &#8216;Are you a newspaper person?&#8217; asks iReport</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/05/20/forbes-com-bloomberg-reporters-told-their-tweets-are-inaccurate/" rel="bookmark" title="May 20, 2010">Forbes.com: Bloomberg reporters told their tweets are inaccurate</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/07/ariana-huffington-journalism-will-not-only-survive-but-thrive/" rel="bookmark" title="May 7, 2009">Ariana Huffington: &#8216;Journalism will not only survive but thrive&#8217;</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.781 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/08/bill-grueskin-what-would-google-do-about-newspapers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Bill Grueskin: A tale of two journalism start-ups</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/04/30/bill-grueskin-a-tale-of-two-journalism-start-ups/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/04/30/bill-grueskin-a-tale-of-two-journalism-start-ups/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 08:25:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[bill grueskin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lawyer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managing Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publish2]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[subscription services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9918</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Former WSJ.com managing editor Bill Grueskin looks at &#8216;link journalism&#8217; venture Publish2 and the recently launched Journalism Online, whose founders include an ex-WSJ publisher and the founder of American Lawyer. Can Journalism Online&#8217;s founder translate their wealth of &#8216;traditional media&#8217; experience online? &#8220;One new firm seeks to generate much-needed revenue by building a platform [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/04/30/bill-grueskin-a-tale-of-two-journalism-start-ups/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Bill Grueskin: A tale of two journalism start-ups">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Former WSJ.com managing editor Bill Grueskin looks at <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/5/articles/532603.php" target="_blank">&#8216;link journalism&#8217; venture Publish2</a> and the recently launched Journalism Online, whose founders include an ex-WSJ publisher and the founder of American Lawyer.</p>
<p>Can Journalism Online&#8217;s founder translate their wealth of &#8216;traditional media&#8217; experience online?</p>
<p>&#8220;One new firm seeks to generate much-needed revenue by building a platform for subscription services, another seeks to generate new forms of journalism with a platform to share and distribute content. It&#8217;s hard to reconcile those two visions of journalism&#8217;s future,&#8221; writes Grueskin.</p>
<p><a href="http://newsosaur.blogspot.com/2009/04/tale-of-two-very-different-journalism.html">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/02/09/allmediascotland-glasgow-local-paper-closes-after-14-years/" rel="bookmark" title="February 9, 2011">AllMediaScotland: Glasgow local paper closes after 14 years</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/07/23/french-newspapers-in-cahoots-over-pay-system-to-rival-google/" rel="bookmark" title="July 23, 2010">French newspapers in cahoots over pay system to rival Google</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/24/bbc-trust-launches-its-largest-tv-service-review-into-bbc-one-bbc-two-and-bbc-four/" rel="bookmark" title="September 24, 2009">BBC Trust launches &#8216;its largest&#8217; TV service review &#8211; into BBC One, BBC Two and BBC Four</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/01/readwriteweb-cnet-signs-up-for-open-calais/" rel="bookmark" title="June 1, 2009">ReadWriteWeb: CNET signs up for Open Calais</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/02/20/innovations-in-journalism-seesmiccom/" rel="bookmark" title="February 20, 2008">Innovations in Journalism &#8211; Seesmic.com</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.613 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/04/30/bill-grueskin-a-tale-of-two-journalism-start-ups/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ.com: US local TV stations and their &#8216;fuzzy future&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/11/wsjcom-us-local-tv-stations-and-their-fuzzy-future/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/11/wsjcom-us-local-tv-stations-and-their-fuzzy-future/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Broadcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising slump]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[tv stations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=7980</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet An illustrative feature on why local television stations in the US face a fuzzy future. &#8220;Now, with their viewership in decline and ad revenue on a downward spiral, many local TV stations face the prospect of being cut out of the picture,&#8221; WSJ comments. &#8220;Executives at some major networks are beginning to talk about [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/11/wsjcom-us-local-tv-stations-and-their-fuzzy-future/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="WSJ.com: US local TV stations and their &#8216;fuzzy future&#8217;">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>An illustrative feature on why local television stations in the US face a fuzzy future. &#8220;Now, with their viewership in decline and ad revenue on a downward spiral, many local TV stations face the prospect of being cut out of the picture,&#8221; WSJ comments.</p>
<p>&#8220;Executives at some major networks are beginning to talk about an option that once would have been unthinkable: eventually taking shows straight to cable, where networks can take in a steady stream of subscriber fees even in an advertising slump.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB123422910357065971.html?mod=WSJ_TimesEMEA" target="_blank">Full story at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/11/30/reuters-microsoft-plans-new-subscription-tv-service-via-xbox/" rel="bookmark" title="November 30, 2010">Reuters: Microsoft plans new subscription TV service via Xbox</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/28/advertising-age-why-ad-networks-are-surviving/" rel="bookmark" title="August 28, 2009">Advertising Age: Why ad networks are surviving</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/28/growing-effect-of-online-advertising-in-us-opa-study-suggests/" rel="bookmark" title="August 28, 2008">Growing effect of online advertising in US, OPA study suggests</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/06/09/jeremy-hunt-no-local-tv-is-one-of-biggest-gaps-in-british-broadcasting/" rel="bookmark" title="June 9, 2010">Jeremy Hunt: No local TV is one of biggest gaps in British broadcasting</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/15/associated-press-launches-story-and-picture-service-for-mobiles/" rel="bookmark" title="April 15, 2008">Associated Press launches story and picture service for mobiles</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.326 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/11/wsjcom-us-local-tv-stations-and-their-fuzzy-future/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WSJ.com: Major US newspaper circulations continue to fall</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/27/wsjcom-major-us-newspaper-circulations-continue-to-fall/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/27/wsjcom-major-us-newspaper-circulations-continue-to-fall/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 12:29:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Audit Bureau of Circulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Major US newspaper circulations]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://online.wsj.com/article/SB122507288489970971.html?mod=rss_whats_news_us</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[According to industry estimates of data that the Audit Bureau of Circulations is releasing today, most of the largest U.S. newspapers saw a drop in print circulation in the six months through September. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/27/wsjcom-major-us-newspaper-circulations-continue-to-fall/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="WSJ.com: Major US newspaper circulations continue to fall">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>According to industry estimates of data that the Audit Bureau of Circulations is releasing today, most of the large US newspapers saw a drop in print circulation in the six months through to September.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/10/26/us-newspaper-circulations-still-falling-but-decline-is-slowing/" rel="bookmark" title="October 26, 2010">US newspaper circulations still falling, but decline is slowing</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/08/09/paidcontent-decline-in-consumer-magazine-circulations-slows/" rel="bookmark" title="August 9, 2010">paidContent: Decline in consumer magazine circulations slows</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/14/lone-star-defies-downward-trend-in-revised-abc-results/" rel="bookmark" title="August 14, 2009">Lone Star defies downward trend in revised ABC results</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/05/21/brand-republic-ft-withdraws-from-abce-audits-for-web-traffic/" rel="bookmark" title="May 21, 2010">Brand Republic: FT withdraws from ABCe audits for web traffic</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/30/guardian-debuts-six-monthly-abce-figures-for-regional-websites/" rel="bookmark" title="September 30, 2008">Guardian debuts six-monthly ABCe figures for regional websites</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 10.237 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/27/wsjcom-major-us-newspaper-circulations-continue-to-fall/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker alleges computer cut-backs for WSJ.com staff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office-based editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology allowance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the States Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=3439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet So Boris might give out Blackberries (well, &#8216;blackberry-type gizmos&#8217;) to Olympics spectators in 2012, but over in the States Wall Street Journal journalists are finding that their technology allowance is being cut back. Or so this &#8216;internal memo&#8217; on Gawker.com would have us believe. Is it for real? Apparently, all WSJ news staff have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Gawker alleges computer cut-backs for WSJ.com staff">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>So <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/oct/07/olympics2012.boris" target="_blank">Boris might give out Blackberries</a> (well, &#8216;blackberry-type gizmos&#8217;) to Olympics spectators in 2012, but over in the States Wall Street Journal journalists are finding that their technology allowance is being cut back.</p>
<p>Or so <a href="http://gawker.com/5060443/wsj-reporters-forced-to-lug-laptops" target="_blank">this &#8216;internal memo&#8217; on Gawker.com</a> would have us believe. Is it for real? Apparently, all WSJ news staff have been told that a new money-saving measure is in place: &#8216;at its core is the concept of &#8220;one person/one machine.&#8217;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If you are an office-based editor, you&#8217;ll get a new desktop. If you are a reporter or editor who travels on assignment, you&#8217;ll get a new laptop with a docking station, keyboard and monitor for office use.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s what the alleged internal memo reads. Comments below the Gawker article are sceptical: surely the typos in the memo are a bigger story than the computer cuts, writes &#8216;drunkexpatworker&#8217;.</p>
<p>Hmmm. Authentic or not? It seems an odd kind of prank if not: it wasn&#8217;t that funny.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/19/overheard-something-humorous-in-your-newsroom/" rel="bookmark" title="January 19, 2009">Overheard something humorous in your newsroom?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/06/17/video-evidence-of-more-media-restrictions-on-bp-oil-spill-beaches/" rel="bookmark" title="June 17, 2010">Video: Evidence of more media restrictions on BP oil spill beaches</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/27/nieman-journalism-lab-nytimes-appoints-jennifer-preston-as-social-media-editor/" rel="bookmark" title="May 27, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: NYTimes appoints Jennifer Preston as social media editor</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/05/a-short-film-on-photo-assignments/" rel="bookmark" title="October 5, 2009">A short film on photo assignments</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/07/31/tip-of-the-day-from-journalismcouk-preventing-back-strain-at-work/" rel="bookmark" title="July 31, 2008">Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; preventing back strain at work</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.458 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online media consumption up by seven per cent, as a result of financial strife</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/07/online-media-consumption-up-by-seven-per-cent-as-a-result-of-financial-strife/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/07/online-media-consumption-up-by-seven-per-cent-as-a-result-of-financial-strife/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 17:57:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Fred Friedrich</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[akamai]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[beet tv]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial reports]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FT.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet flow]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online media consumption]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online media information]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reuters]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spokeswoman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=3408</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Yesterday, Beet TV flagged up that a record number of users seeking online media information led to a seven per cent spike in traffic for Akamai, the delivery network which carries the internet flow for NBC, the BBC, Reuters and other news sites. The current economic turmoil, hurricanes and the presidential campaign has helped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/07/online-media-consumption-up-by-seven-per-cent-as-a-result-of-financial-strife/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Online media consumption up by seven per cent, as a result of financial strife">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p><a href="http://blip.tv/file/1330118" target="_blank">Yesterday, Beet TV flagged up</a> that a record number of users seeking online media information led to a seven per cent spike in traffic for <a title="akami" href="http://www.akamai.com/html/technology/nui/news/index.html">Akamai</a>, the delivery network which carries the internet flow for NBC, the BBC, Reuters and other news sites.</p>
<p>The current economic turmoil, hurricanes and the presidential campaign has helped boost the need for online information. At their peak, Akamai were registering 3.7 million requests per minute.</p>
<p>The spike follows a trend for online news sites doing well in times of financial strife: last month site traffic &#8216;exploded&#8217; at the <a title="ft" href="http://www.ft.com/home/europe">FT.com</a>, as a result of the drop in share prices.</p>
<p>The need for information was felt on Wall Street, coinciding with a redesign of the <a title="wall" href="http://online.wsj.com/public/us">Wall Street Journal Online</a>. &#8220;Monday set an all time record of two million visitors&#8221;, a Wall Street Journal spokeswoman told <a title="beet" href="http://www.beet.tv/2008/09/wall-street-deb.html">Beet.TV</a>.  Traffic on Tuesday was nearly as high.  <a title="beet" href="http://www.beet.tv/2008/09/wall-street-deb.html">&#8220;These are pretty big numbers, considering monthly unique visitors are 17 million,&#8221;</a> she said.</p>
<p>The irony is that financial disaster, hurricanes and presidential elections seem to be a good thing for the world of online media.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/07/election-traffic-washingtonpost-sees-biggest-jump-but-cnn-leads/" rel="bookmark" title="November 7, 2008">Election traffic: WashingtonPost sees biggest jump but CNN leads</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/14/portfolio-wsj-quietly-making-big-traffic-strides/" rel="bookmark" title="April 14, 2008">Portfolio: WSJ quietly making big traffic strides</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/01/26/talking-biz-news-dow-jones-restructuring/" rel="bookmark" title="January 26, 2010">Talking Biz News: Dow Jones restructuring</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/wall-street-journal-expanding-live-web-video-news-programming/" rel="bookmark" title="October 19, 2009">Beet.tv: WSJ to expand live news video online</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/05/14/wall-street-journal-new-york-times-to-start-charging-for-online-in-january/" rel="bookmark" title="May 14, 2010">Wall Street Journal: New York Times to start charging for online in January</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.658 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/07/online-media-consumption-up-by-seven-per-cent-as-a-result-of-financial-strife/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>What&#8217;s new in the WSJ.com redesign</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/16/whats-new-in-the-wsjcom-redesign/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/16/whats-new-in-the-wsjcom-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Sep 2008 11:53:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[personal finance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking feature]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[video player]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2897</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet The Wall Street Journal set its revamped site live today, so here&#8217;s a breakdown of what&#8217;s changed and what&#8217;s new: New Journal Community - a social networking feature for the site&#8217;s paying subscribers, which lets them comment on articles, &#8216;ask the expert&#8217; and join topic-based networks and discussion groups Subscriber-only sections marked with a [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/16/whats-new-in-the-wsjcom-redesign/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="What&#8217;s new in the WSJ.com redesign">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>The <a href="http://www.wsj.com">Wall Street Journal set its revamped site live today</a>, so here&#8217;s a breakdown of what&#8217;s changed and what&#8217;s new:</p>
<p><strong>New</strong></p>
<ul>
<li><strong>Journal Community </strong>- a social networking feature for the site&#8217;s paying subscribers, which lets them comment on articles, &#8216;ask the expert&#8217; and join topic-based networks and discussion groups<strong><br />
</strong></li>
<li>Subscriber-only sections marked with a key icon and available for preview by non-subscribers</li>
<li><strong>Newsreel </strong>- a scrolling, horizontal panel topping article pages, which links to other top stories. (Seems to be on most US stories at the moment, as shown in the picture below)</li>
<li>New video player and slideshow viewer</li>
<li>A new WSJ.com <strong>mobile reader</strong> for the Blackberry</li>
<li>New management section &#8211; available to subscribers only<strong><br />
</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Changes</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Expanded content across its What&#8217;s News, Heard on the Street, small business, technology, US and world news, politics, personal finance and lifestyle sections</li>
<li>Improved navigation &#8211; including horizontal menu bar across all pages</li>
<li>Redesigned article pages to support more multimedia content and provide &#8216;related analysis&#8217;</li>
</ul>
<p>Paying subscribers to the site, which WSJ claims have risen to more than 1 million, will also have increased access to the site&#8217;s archive.</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-2906" title="Screenshot of Wall Street Journal article page" src="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/wp-content/uploads/2008/09/wsjnew.jpg" alt="" width="358" height="271" /></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/17/wsj-confirms-paid-for-access-to-news-on-mobile/" rel="bookmark" title="September 17, 2009">WSJ confirms paid-for access to news on mobile</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/07/17/behind-the-scenes-telegraphcouks-redesign/" rel="bookmark" title="July 17, 2008">Behind the scenes: Telegraph.co.uk&#8217;s redesign</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/07/news-of-the-world-launches-website-redesign-in-beta/" rel="bookmark" title="August 7, 2008">News of the World launches website redesign in beta</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/15/nytimescom-new-wsjcom-uses-its-community-of-subscribers/" rel="bookmark" title="September 15, 2008">NYTimes.com: New WSJ.com uses its community of subscribers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/11/08/btpw-golden-age-for-mobile-news-sites-is-ending-well-in-japan/" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2007">@BtPW: Golden age for mobile news sites is ending &#8211; well, in Japan</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.759 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/16/whats-new-in-the-wsjcom-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYTimes.com: New WSJ.com uses its community of subscribers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/15/nytimescom-new-wsjcom-uses-its-community-of-subscribers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/15/nytimescom-new-wsjcom-uses-its-community-of-subscribers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 15:28:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bits.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/09/15/new-wsjcom-builds-on-its-community-of-subscribers/?ref=technology</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal will activate a revamped version of its website tomorrow, but the existing wall that blocks non-subscribers from reading most of the site's business news articles will remain. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/15/nytimescom-new-wsjcom-uses-its-community-of-subscribers/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="NYTimes.com: New WSJ.com uses its community of subscribers">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>The Wall Street Journal will activate a revamped version of its website tomorrow, but the existing wall that blocks non-subscribers from reading most of the site&#8217;s business news articles will remain.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/16/whats-new-in-the-wsjcom-redesign/" rel="bookmark" title="September 16, 2008">What&#8217;s new in the WSJ.com redesign</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/17/wsj-confirms-paid-for-access-to-news-on-mobile/" rel="bookmark" title="September 17, 2009">WSJ confirms paid-for access to news on mobile</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/06/thedailybeast-ex-wsj-assistant-publisher-on-paid-online-content-myths-and-facts/" rel="bookmark" title="March 6, 2009">TheDailyBeast: Ex-WSJ assistant publisher on paid online content &#8211; myths and facts</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/11/ftcom-wsj-to-introduce-micropayments/" rel="bookmark" title="May 11, 2009">FT.com: WSJ to introduce micropayments</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/01/26/talking-biz-news-dow-jones-restructuring/" rel="bookmark" title="January 26, 2010">Talking Biz News: Dow Jones restructuring</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 7.598 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/15/nytimescom-new-wsjcom-uses-its-community-of-subscribers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>International Herald Tribune: Wall Street Journal website redesign</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/05/international-herald-tribune-wall-street-journal-website-redesign/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/05/international-herald-tribune-wall-street-journal-website-redesign/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Sep 2008 12:59:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[glossy magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International Herald Tribune]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.iht.com/articles/ap/2008/09/03/america/Wall-Street-Journal-Magazine.php</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This Saturday's Wall Street Journal will see the first issue of a new glossy magazine, one part of their development project, which also includes the relaunch of the Journal's WSJ.com website on September 16. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/05/international-herald-tribune-wall-street-journal-website-redesign/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="International Herald Tribune: Wall Street Journal website redesign">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>This Saturday&#8217;s Wall Street Journal will see the first issue of a new glossy magazine, one part of their development project, which also includes the relaunch of the Journal&#8217;s WSJ.com website on September 16.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/01/26/talking-biz-news-dow-jones-restructuring/" rel="bookmark" title="January 26, 2010">Talking Biz News: Dow Jones restructuring</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/05/14/wall-street-journal-new-york-times-to-start-charging-for-online-in-january/" rel="bookmark" title="May 14, 2010">Wall Street Journal: New York Times to start charging for online in January</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/06/thedailybeast-ex-wsj-assistant-publisher-on-paid-online-content-myths-and-facts/" rel="bookmark" title="March 6, 2009">TheDailyBeast: Ex-WSJ assistant publisher on paid online content &#8211; myths and facts</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/09/new-york-magazine-weigh-in-for-new-york-times-and-wall-street-journal/" rel="bookmark" title="April 9, 2010">New York Magazine: Weigh-in for New York Times and Wall Street Journal</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/12/editorsweblog-emerging-nations-favour-mobile-internet-access/" rel="bookmark" title="December 12, 2008">EditorsWeblog: Emerging nations favour mobile internet access</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 35.843 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/05/international-herald-tribune-wall-street-journal-website-redesign/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Gazette: Subscriptions to WSJ.com rise by 88 per cent</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/06/press-gazette-subscriptions-to-wsjcom-rise-by-88-per-cent/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/06/press-gazette-subscriptions-to-wsjcom-rise-by-88-per-cent/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Aug 2008 12:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News Corporation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&#038;storycode=41848&#038;c=1</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Subscriptions to the Wall Street Journal's pay-for website have risen 88 per cent over the last year, according to News Corporation's end of year results.

Total profit for the company is up from Â£1.7 billion to Â£2.7 billion.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/06/press-gazette-subscriptions-to-wsjcom-rise-by-88-per-cent/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Press Gazette: Subscriptions to WSJ.com rise by 88 per cent">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Subscriptions to the Wall Street Journal&#8217;s pay-for website have risen 88 per cent over the last year, according to News Corporation&#8217;s end of year results.</p>
<p>Total profit for the company is up from £1.7 billion to £2.7 billion.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/10/29/wsj-thomson-reuters-reports-66-per-cent-profit-increase/" rel="bookmark" title="October 29, 2010">WSJ: Thomson Reuters reports 66 per cent profit increase</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/30/digital-ad-revenue-up-30-per-cent-at-wall-street-journal/" rel="bookmark" title="September 30, 2010">Digital ad revenue up 30 per cent at Wall Street Journal</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/07/23/nyt-second-quarter-operating-profit-more-than-twice-2009-figure/" rel="bookmark" title="July 23, 2010">NYT second-quarter operating profit more than twice 2009 figure</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/10/12/new-figures-suggest-continued-growth-for-us-magazine-advertising/" rel="bookmark" title="October 12, 2010">New figures suggest continued growth for US magazine advertising</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/03/29/online-advertising-spend-tops-4bn-after-12-8-rise/" rel="bookmark" title="March 29, 2011">Online advertising spend tops £4bn after 12.8% rise</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 45.193 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/06/press-gazette-subscriptions-to-wsjcom-rise-by-88-per-cent/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>While we were away&#8230; EveryBlock, LoudounExtra, BBC plans and more</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/09/while-we-were-away-everyblock-loudounextra-bbc-plans-and-more/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/09/while-we-were-away-everyblock-loudounextra-bbc-plans-and-more/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Jun 2008 15:36:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Winehouse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC Trust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Chicago police]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief architect]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Daily Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Data journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editor&Publisher]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EveryBlock]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Globe and Mail]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[hyperlocal news site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Blair]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kate Moss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[launch]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[loudounextra.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Ingram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MyTelegraph Communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[news site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rob Curley]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search engine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shane Richmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spin-off site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Beeb]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Root]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Slate Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World Association of Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/06/09/while-we-were-away-everyblock-loudounextra-bbc-plans-and-more/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet In case you hadn&#8217;t noticed, Journalism.co.uk was in Sweden last week covering the World Association of Newspapers annual conference and the World Editors Forum. So no one misses out, here&#8217;s a round-up of what went down while we were away: Guardian: BBC ends &#8216;licence fee&#8217; plans for international news website The Beeb has dropped [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/09/while-we-were-away-everyblock-loudounextra-bbc-plans-and-more/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="While we were away&#8230; EveryBlock, LoudounExtra, BBC plans and more">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>In case you hadn&#8217;t noticed, Journalism.co.uk was in Sweden last week covering the World Association of Newspapers annual conference and the World Editors Forum.</p>
<p>So no one misses out, here&#8217;s a round-up of what went down while we were away:</p>
<p><strong>Guardian: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jun/05/bbc.digitalmedia">BBC ends &#8216;licence fee&#8217; plans for international news website</a></strong><br />
The Beeb has dropped proposals for subscription-based access to BBC.com</p>
<p><strong>WSJ.com: <a href="http://online.wsj.com/article/SB121253859877343291.html?mod=2_1567_topbox">Analysis of hyperlocal news site LoudounExtra.com</a></strong><br />
Following the <a href="http://robcurley.com/2008/05/24/earlier-this-week-it-was-108-degrees-in-las-vegas/">departure of Rob Curley</a>, chief architect behind the <a href="http://www.loudonextra.com">Washington Post spin-off site</a>, WSJ asks if the site has found its audience a year into the project.</p>
<p><strong>Editor&amp;Publisher: <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/news/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003811563">94 newspapers join Yahoo partnership</a></strong><br />
A total of 779 newspapers now have access to the search engine&#8217;s advertising technology and HotJobs ads.</p>
<p><strong>Daily Mail: <a href="http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-1024660/Met-chief-attacked-prosecutor-calls-caught-camera-drug-taking-celebrities-trial.html">Sir Ian Blair advocates use of celebrity news videos as evidence in drug trials</a></strong><br />
Footage, such as <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/28/amy-winehouse-video-attracts-one-million-views-in-two-days/">the Sun&#8217;s infamous Amy Winehouse video</a> and of Kate Moss snorting a white substance, should be presented to the jury in such cases, Blair has said.</p>
<p><strong>Guardian: <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jun/04/bbc.digitalmedia">BBC&#8217;s new plans for personalisation of website</a></strong><br />
Plans to create a new rating, recommendation and personalisation system across bbc.co.uk will be put to the BBC Trust, according to the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2008/06_june/04/sopps.shtml">corporation&#8217;s latest programme policy statement</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Editor&#8217;s Weblog: <a href="http://www.editorsweblog.org/multimedia/2008/06/us_the_slate_group_launched_plans_to_dev.php">Washington Post launches online publishing company</a></strong><br />
The Slate Group will feature a host of digital titles including <a href="http://www.slate.com">Slate</a> and <a href="http://www.theroot.com">The Root</a>, with additional launches planned.</p>
<p><strong>Telegraph.co.uk: <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/june-2008/rebuilding-my-telegraph-2.htm">Update on revamp of community blogging platform MyTelegraph</a></strong><br />
Communities editor Shane Richmond says a relaunch date will be announced by the end of next week.</p>
<p><strong>Matthew Ingram: <a href="http://mathewingram.com/media/2008/06/02/globe-and-mail-pay-wall-comes-down/">Globe and Mail removes pay wall</a></strong><br />
Number of subscribers was not enough to maintain the wall, says Ingram, who works for the paper. Some readers remain unconvinced, he says, pointing out one comment: &#8220;You can’t shut us out for a few years and then expect us to come back just because it’s free.&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>MediaShift: <a href="http://www.pbs.org/idealab/2008/06/the-first-everyblock-special-r.html">Everyblock releases first special report</a></strong><br />
The <a href="http://www.everyblock.com">hyperlocal data and news site</a> has mapped information from a recent Chicago police bribery investigation as part of its first special report.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/16/paidcontentuk-interview-with-jacob-weisberg-slate-group-editor-in-chief/" rel="bookmark" title="February 16, 2009">paidContent:UK: Interview with Jacob Weisberg, Slate Group editor-in-chief</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/11/05/ep-washington-post-survey-suggests-hyperlocal-moves-are-afoot/" rel="bookmark" title="November 5, 2010">E&#038;P: Washington Post survey suggests hyperlocal moves are afoot</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/18/loudoun-independent-washington-post-pulling-plug-on-hyperlocal-site-in-loudoun/" rel="bookmark" title="August 18, 2009">Loudoun Independent: Washington Post pulling plug on hyperlocal site in Loudoun</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/02/nieman-journalism-lab-why-the-nyt-was-wrong-to-keep-quiet-about-rohdes-kidnap/" rel="bookmark" title="July 2, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: Why the NYT was wrong to keep quiet about Rohde&#8217;s kidnap</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/29/nieman-journalism-lab-globe-and-mail-on-setting-up-a-news-wiki/" rel="bookmark" title="January 29, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: Globe and Mail on setting up a news wiki</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.927 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/09/while-we-were-away-everyblock-loudounextra-bbc-plans-and-more/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>WAN 08: Disparities between pay of web and print journalists &#8211; a problem all over the world for integrating newsrooms</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/03/wan-08-disparities-between-pay-of-web-and-print-journalists-a-problem-all-over-the-world-for-integrating-newsrooms/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/03/wan-08-disparities-between-pay-of-web-and-print-journalists-a-problem-all-over-the-world-for-integrating-newsrooms/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Jun 2008 14:47:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Luft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Almar Latour]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor of digital news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor-in-chief]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[El Pais]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[energy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Goteborg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[integration]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Javier Moreno]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jim Roberts]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Managing Editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online editions]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WAN 08]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web content]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web journalists]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic figures]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/06/03/wan-08-disparities-between-pay-of-web-and-print-journalists-a-problem-all-over-the-world-for-integrating-newsrooms/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Integrating newsrooms isn’t just a matter of putting all you desks in a spoke and fulcrum formation and projecting the web traffic figures on the wall. The small matter of how you remunerate journalists expected to work both for print and web is an issue for newspapers across the globe. It’s an issue that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/03/wan-08-disparities-between-pay-of-web-and-print-journalists-a-problem-all-over-the-world-for-integrating-newsrooms/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="WAN 08: Disparities between pay of web and print journalists &#8211; a problem all over the world for integrating newsrooms">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Integrating newsrooms isn’t just a matter of putting all you desks in a spoke and fulcrum formation and projecting the web traffic figures on the wall.</p>
<p>The small matter of how you remunerate journalists expected to work both for print and web is an issue for newspapers across the globe.</p>
<p>It’s an issue that the Guardian and Telegraph, to name just <a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=39607">two in the UK</a>, have been wrestling with as they bring their <a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=39066">divergent print and online editions closer together</a>.</p>
<p>International editors sitting on a panel looking at whether integrated newsrooms are really working at the World Editors Forum, today in Goteborg, Sweden, admitted to a similar set of problems.</p>
<p>Jim Roberts, editor of digital news at the New York Times, told delegates that the Times’ own integration plans were hampered by the different contracts and lower pay web journalists were receiving compared to their print colleagues.</p>
<p>Roberts is overseeing the introduction of a ‘horizontal’ news production system where each separate news department has web producers embedded with them to encourage multimedia content production, oversee publication.</p>
<p>The Times is trying to spread multimedia, video, podcasts and interactive features across all its news verticals – even to the point where the Times is reverse publishing blog content as columns into the printed edition of the newspaper.</p>
<p>This drive for web content has also brought a renewed thirst to keep the newspaper print edition fresh, as Roberts said ‘to redirect this energy back into print’.</p>
<p>But as staff are now expected to work for both web and print, the different contracts they work under has led to union wrangles.  WSJ.com managing editor Almar Latour and Javier Moreno, editor-in-chief of El Pais, Spain, agreed that they faced similar contractual problems on their integration projects.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/15/followjourn-dan-robertsbusiness-editor/" rel="bookmark" title="April 15, 2010">#followjourn: Dan Roberts/business editor</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/03/26/online-journalism-scandinavia-print-and-online-integration-not-the-key-to-success/" rel="bookmark" title="March 26, 2008">Online Journalism Scandinavia: Print and online integration &#8216;not the key to success&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/14/headline-mishaps-continue-at-johnston-press-titles/" rel="bookmark" title="September 14, 2010">Headline mishaps at Johnston Press and Newsquest titles</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/20/mediaguardian-trinity-mirror-announce-redundancies-for-all-300-editorial-staff-in-midlands/" rel="bookmark" title="August 20, 2008">MediaGuardian: Trinity Mirror announces redundancies for all 300 editorial staff in Midlands</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/25/ipad-news-would-you-pay-more/" rel="bookmark" title="March 25, 2010">iPad news: would you pay more?</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.645 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/06/03/wan-08-disparities-between-pay-of-web-and-print-journalists-a-problem-all-over-the-world-for-integrating-newsrooms/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Wall Street Journal appoints chief technology officer</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/13/wall-street-journal-appoints-chief-technology-officer/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/13/wall-street-journal-appoints-chief-technology-officer/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 15:16:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[chief technology officer for its digital network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Dow Jones]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[financial communications consultancy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gordon McLeod]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[large media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[President]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ruby]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sarabjit 'Ruby' Walia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[success leading digital technology businesses]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/13/wall-street-journal-appoints-chief-technology-officer/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet The Wall Street Journal (WSJ) has named Sarabjit &#8216;Ruby&#8217; Walia as chief technology officer for its digital network. Walia will manage the technology across WSJ.com and Dow Jones&#8217; sister websites Barrons and MarketWatch. He joins the Journal from business and financial communications consultancy Financial Dynamics. &#8220;Ruby&#8217;s success leading digital technology businesses within large media [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/13/wall-street-journal-appoints-chief-technology-officer/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Wall Street Journal appoints chief technology officer">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p><a href="http://www.wsj.com">The Wall Street Journal</a><a href="http://www.wsj.com"> (WSJ)</a> has named Sarabjit &#8216;Ruby&#8217; Walia as chief technology officer for its digital network.</p>
<p>Walia will manage the technology across WSJ.com and Dow Jones&#8217; sister websites <a href="http://www.barrons.com">Barrons</a> and <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com">MarketWatch</a>.</p>
<p>He joins the Journal from business and financial communications consultancy Financial Dynamics.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Ruby&#8217;s success leading digital technology businesses within large media companies in this space will ensure our ability to innovate and continue to bring users the most effective digital experiences possible to our millions of loyal users,&#8221; said Gordon McLeod, president of the WSJ digital network, in <a href="http://www.dowjones.com/Pressroom/PressReleases/Other/US/2008/0513_US_TheWallStreetJournalOnlineNetwork_5559.htm">a press release</a>.</p></blockquote>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/26/ep-haitian-press-every-bit-as-devastated-as-island-itself/" rel="bookmark" title="March 26, 2010">E&#038;P: Haitian press &#8216;every bit as devastated as island itself&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/15/thebusinessdesk-expands-with-iphone-app-for-regional-business-news/" rel="bookmark" title="March 15, 2010">TheBusinessDesk expands with iPhone app for regional business news</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/17/wsj-confirms-paid-for-access-to-news-on-mobile/" rel="bookmark" title="September 17, 2009">WSJ confirms paid-for access to news on mobile</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/24/digital-journal-launches-revenue-sharing-for-its-citizen-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="April 24, 2008">Digital Journal launches revenue sharing for its citizen journalists</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/01/26/talking-biz-news-dow-jones-restructuring/" rel="bookmark" title="January 26, 2010">Talking Biz News: Dow Jones restructuring</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.430 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/13/wall-street-journal-appoints-chief-technology-officer/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

