<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Editors&#039; Blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk &#187; techmeme</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/tag/techmeme/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Is Facebook building a phone? Aggregation leads to some very mixed messages</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/20/is-facebook-building-a-phone-aggregation-leads-to-some-very-mixed-messages/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/20/is-facebook-building-a-phone-aggregation-leads-to-some-very-mixed-messages/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Sep 2010 09:58:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handy tools and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mobile]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[aggregators]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techmeme]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired Epicenter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=26429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet A great spot from Wired&#8217;s Epicenter Blog: is Facebook developing a phone or not? While aggregators filter information, what role should they have in verifying content? Or are such images illustrative of the current state of journalism? Similar Posts:Wired offers creative commons images in exchange for link #Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/20/is-facebook-building-a-phone-aggregation-leads-to-some-very-mixed-messages/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Is Facebook building a phone? Aggregation leads to some very mixed messages">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p><a title="Epicenter Blog on Yfrog" href="http://yfrog.com/n3jqjp" target="_blank">A great spot from Wired&#8217;s Epicenter Blog</a>: is Facebook developing a phone or not?</p>
<p><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-26431" title="Techmeme image" src="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/wp-content/uploads/2010/09/jqj.jpg" alt="" width="500" height="634" /></p>
<p>While aggregators filter information, what role should they have in verifying content? Or are such images illustrative of the current state of journalism?</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/11/15/wired-offers-creative-commons-images-in-exchange-for-link/" rel="bookmark" title="November 15, 2011">Wired offers creative commons images in exchange for link</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/06/22/tip-of-the-day-from-journalism-co-uk-%e2%80%93-search-by-image-service-on-google/" rel="bookmark" title="June 22, 2011">#Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – search by image service on Google</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/09/ap-search-engines-must-pay-up-say-murdoch-and-aps-curley/" rel="bookmark" title="October 9, 2009">AP: Search engines must pay up, say Murdoch and AP&#8217;s Curley</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2012/02/08/tip-of-the-day-from-journalism-co-uk-post-to-facebook-at-9am-1pm-3pm-and-5pm/" rel="bookmark" title="February 8, 2012">#Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; post to Facebook at 9am, 1pm, 3pm and 5pm</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/08/10/facebook-to-take-on-bbm-and-google-with-new-phone-messaging-app/" rel="bookmark" title="August 10, 2011">Facebook to take on BBM and Google+ with new phone messaging app</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.481 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/20/is-facebook-building-a-phone-aggregation-leads-to-some-very-mixed-messages/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Techmeme.com: &#8216;Automated news doesn&#8217;t quite work&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/04/techmemecom-automated-new-doesnt-quite-work/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/04/techmemecom-automated-new-doesnt-quite-work/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 04 Dec 2008 12:37:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated news]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[techmeme]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://news.techmeme.com/081203/automated</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[A piece looking at the downfall of automated news: while it brings a lot to the table, 'this approach always comes up a bit short'. Techmeme will now have a more humanised approach, this post says.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/04/techmemecom-automated-new-doesnt-quite-work/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Techmeme.com: &#8216;Automated news doesn&#8217;t quite work&#8217;">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>A piece looking at the downfall of automated news: while it brings a lot to the table, &#8216;this approach always comes up a bit short,&#8217; this article says, adding that Techmeme will now have a more humanised approach.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/04/tip-of-the-day-from-journalismcouk-28/" rel="bookmark" title="April 4, 2008">Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/07/22/press-gazette-automated-news-will-free-up-journalists-says-agency-report/" rel="bookmark" title="July 22, 2008">Press Gazette: Automated news will free up journalists, says agency report</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2012/01/16/bbc-news-the-editors-views-from-the-leveson-inquiry/" rel="bookmark" title="January 16, 2012">BBC News: The editors&#8217; views from the Leveson inquiry</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/08/31/nieman-the-new-york-times-and-the-kitchen-table-of-the-future/" rel="bookmark" title="August 31, 2011">Nieman: The New York Times and the kitchen table of the future</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/11/10/editor-of-bbc-news-website-outlines-live-coverage-trial/" rel="bookmark" title="November 10, 2011">Editor of BBC News website outlines live coverage trial</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 9.783 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/04/techmemecom-automated-new-doesnt-quite-work/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

