<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Editors&#039; Blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk &#187; Steve Boriss</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/tag/steve-boriss/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Citizen experts not citizen journalists?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/11/29/citizen-experts-not-citizen-journalists/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/11/29/citizen-experts-not-citizen-journalists/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 29 Nov 2007 14:03:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Citizen journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaNews Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[model]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Paris]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Boriss]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Steve Outing]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2007/11/29/citizen-experts-not-citizen-journalists/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Yesterday&#8217;s news that Topix will now handle the forums and article commenting system for MediaNews Group raises some questions for the future of user-generated content on news sites. Does the future of so-called citizen journalism and user-generated content on news sites lie in opinion/comment rather than reporting? MediaNews&#8217; decision seems to suggest so, investing [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/11/29/citizen-experts-not-citizen-journalists/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Citizen experts not citizen journalists?">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Yesterday&#8217;s news that <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/530800.php">Topix will now handle the forums and article commenting system for MediaNews Group</a> raises some questions for the future of user-generated content on news sites.</p>
<p>Does the future of so-called citizen journalism and user-generated content on news sites lie in opinion/comment rather than reporting?</p>
<p>MediaNews&#8217; decision seems to suggest so, investing in areas of their sites where users react or debate content rather than submitting their own.</p>
<p>Writing for the Future of News blog, Steve Boriss takes this one step further saying: &#8216;<a href="http://thefutureofnews.com/2007/11/28/citizen-journalism-is-dead-expert-journalism-is-the-future/">Citizen journalism is dead. Expert journalism is the future</a>&#8216;.  To summarise, Boriss argues that citizens (and to some extent professinal journalists) should not be reporters or newsgatherers for online but act as &#8216;topic experts&#8217;:</p>
<blockquote><p><em>The model that will work — that will make news better, not worse — is one that combines the talents of topic experts throughout the web with those who have a knack for aggregating and editing their material to satisfy an audience.</em></p></blockquote>
<p>Quality content, whether it&#8217;s from citizens or journalists, properly targeted by editors with the ability to &#8216;energize their audience&#8217;. To be avoided: allowing a free-for-all in terms of the quality of user-generated content in a bid to show users that their contributions are desired.</p>
<p>Allowing citizen journalists and users to submit news reports can be invaluable &#8211; the first pictures of a fire, a natural disaster, riots in Paris. But, as Steve Outing suggests in his article <a href="http://www.editorandpublisher.com/eandp/columns/stopthepresses_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1003677395">analysing the failure of his own grassroots citizen journalism project</a>, the way in which news sites publish this content needs changing.</p>
<p>Too often, says Outing, these images and films are segregated in a separate area of the site away from professional coverage of the event. A better idea, says Outing, is to use editors to select the best submissions and mix these with the professional coverage &#8211; again supporting Boriss&#8217; model of experts and expert editors.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/04/15/webpronews-nytimes-hyperlocal-article-the-follow-up/" rel="bookmark" title="April 15, 2009">WebProNews: NYTimes&#8217; hyperlocal article &#8211; the follow-up</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/02/telegraph-blogs-should-sites-pay-citizen-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="February 2, 2009">Telegraph blogs: Should sites pay citizen journalists?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/21/allvoicescom-offers-10000-reward-for-citizen-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2008">Allvoices.com offers $10,000 reward for citizen journalists</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/26/econsultancy-glam-uses-twitter-makes-money/" rel="bookmark" title="February 26, 2009">Econsultancy: Glam uses Twitter, makes money</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/05/06/citizen-journalism-site-expands-after-getting-1-million-funding/" rel="bookmark" title="May 6, 2011">Citizen journalism site expands after getting £1 million funding</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.990 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/11/29/citizen-experts-not-citizen-journalists/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

