<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Editors&#039; Blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk &#187; search giant</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/tag/search-giant/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>paidContent:UK: Italian Competition Authority searches Google&#8217;s Milan offices in newspaper dispute</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/28/paidcontentuk-italian-competition-authority-searches-googles-milan-offices-in-newspaper-dispute/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/28/paidcontentuk-italian-competition-authority-searches-googles-milan-offices-in-newspaper-dispute/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:08:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian Competition Authority]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italian Federation of Newspaper Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Italy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Milan]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=13447</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet According to several news reports the Italian Competition Authority searched Google&#8217;s Milan offices this morning as part of an investigation into the company&#8217;s abuse of its &#8216;dominant position on the internet&#8217;, says paidContent:UK. The investigation was sparked by a complaint from the Italian Federation of Newspaper Publishers criticising the search giant&#8217;s lack of transparency [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/28/paidcontentuk-italian-competition-authority-searches-googles-milan-offices-in-newspaper-dispute/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="paidContent:UK: Italian Competition Authority searches Google&#8217;s Milan offices in newspaper dispute">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>According to several news reports the Italian Competition Authority searched Google&#8217;s Milan offices this morning as part of an investigation into the company&#8217;s abuse of its &#8216;dominant position on the internet&#8217;, says paidContent:UK.</p>
<p>The investigation was sparked by a complaint from the Italian Federation of Newspaper Publishers criticising the search giant&#8217;s lack of transparency in handling Google News &#8211; in particular the ranking process.</p>
<p><a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-google-news-italian-problem/">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><a href="http://googlepolicyeurope.blogspot.com/2009/08/about-google-news-in-italy.html" target="_blank">Google responds on its European Public Policy Blog</a> stating that publishers can request to be removed from Google News at any time and that Google drives vast amounts of traffic to publishers&#8217; websites.</p>
<p><a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-google-news-italian-problem/"><br />
</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/15/tip-of-the-day-from-journalismcouk-118/" rel="bookmark" title="October 15, 2008">Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; get your blogs listed by Google</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/09/17/how-to-get-the-most-from-google-news-feeds/" rel="bookmark" title="September 17, 2007">How to get the most from Google News feeds</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/12/02/google-introduces-option-for-five-a-day-free-click-limit/" rel="bookmark" title="December 2, 2009">Google introduces option for five-a-day free click limit</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/03/31/bbc-college-of-journalism-blog-google-not-to-blame-for-journalisms-woes/" rel="bookmark" title="March 31, 2011">BBC College of Journalism blog: Google not to blame for journalism&#8217;s woes</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/15/youtube-video-now-available-in-google-maps/" rel="bookmark" title="April 15, 2008">YouTube videos now available in Google Maps</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.663 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/28/paidcontentuk-italian-competition-authority-searches-googles-milan-offices-in-newspaper-dispute/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Google ends Radio Ads scheme &#8211; cites same reasons as Print ads closure</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/13/google-ends-radio-ads-scheme-cites-same-reasons-as-print-ads-closure/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/13/google-ends-radio-ads-scheme-cites-same-reasons-as-print-ads-closure/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:06:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[audio streaming]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google Inc.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[product management]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Radio Ads]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spokesman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Susan Wojcicki]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vice president of product management]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=8121</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet After the search giant announced the end of its Print Ads scheme, Journalism.co.uk contacted Google about the future of its audio and TV ad initiatives. Would they be affected? A resounding no from the Google spokesman. Well, yesterday Google announced it will be closing its Radio Ads programme &#8211; citing similar reasons to the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/13/google-ends-radio-ads-scheme-cites-same-reasons-as-print-ads-closure/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Google ends Radio Ads scheme &#8211; cites same reasons as Print ads closure">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/21/google-closes-print-ads-scheme/" target="_blank">After the search giant announced the end of its Print Ads scheme</a>, Journalism.co.uk contacted Google about the future of its audio and TV ad initiatives.</p>
<p>Would they be affected? A resounding no from the Google spokesman.</p>
<p>Well, <a href="http://google-tmads.blogspot.com/" target="_blank">yesterday Google announced it will be closing its Radio Ads programme</a> &#8211; citing similar reasons to the print scheme closure:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;While we&#8217;ve devoted substantial resources to developing these products and learned a lot along the way, we haven&#8217;t had the impact we hoped for.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>Instead Google will focus on online audio streaming and advertising around this, phasing out the existing audio ads by May 31 and selling Google Radio Automation &#8211; the software that automates broadcast radio programming.</p>
<p>Up to 40 staff involved with the project are expected to lose their jobs, said Susan Wojcicki, vice-president of product management, in the blog announcement.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/08/11/nuj-attacks-newsquest-over-proposed-pension-cuts/" rel="bookmark" title="August 11, 2010">NUJ attacks Newsquest over proposed pension cuts</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/21/google-closes-print-ads-scheme/" rel="bookmark" title="January 21, 2009">Google closes Print Ads scheme</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/10/bbc-google-and-yahoo-to-share-ad-space-online/" rel="bookmark" title="April 10, 2008">BBC: Google and Yahoo to share ad space online</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/11/22/sourcefabric-promises-a-free-multi-platform-solution-for-news-outlets/" rel="bookmark" title="November 22, 2011">Sourcefabric promises a free, multi-platform solution for news outlets</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/26/washington-times-uk-start-up-approached-google-to-buy-print-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="January 26, 2009">Washington Times: UK start-up approached Google to buy Print Ads</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.206 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/13/google-ends-radio-ads-scheme-cites-same-reasons-as-print-ads-closure/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>GigaOm: WSJ &#8216;failed the Web 2.0 test&#8217; with Google story</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/18/gigaom-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test-with-google-story/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/18/gigaom-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test-with-google-story/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 09:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matthew Ingram]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://gigaom.com/2008/12/16/how-the-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The WSJ's reaction to Google's response to its article about the search giant's 'net neutrality' position was an 'old-media approach', writes Matthew Ingram.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/18/gigaom-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test-with-google-story/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="GigaOm: WSJ &#8216;failed the Web 2.0 test&#8217; with Google story">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>The WSJ&#8217;s reaction to Google&#8217;s response to its article about the search giant&#8217;s &#8216;net neutrality&#8217; position was an &#8216;old-media approach&#8217;, writes Matthew Ingram.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/14/nieman-journalism-lab-matthew-ingram-on-the-wsjs-social-media-policy/" rel="bookmark" title="May 14, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: Matthew Ingram on the WSJ&#8217;s social media policy</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/02/nieman-journalism-lab-why-the-nyt-was-wrong-to-keep-quiet-about-rohdes-kidnap/" rel="bookmark" title="July 2, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: Why the NYT was wrong to keep quiet about Rohde&#8217;s kidnap</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/28/paidcontentuk-italian-competition-authority-searches-googles-milan-offices-in-newspaper-dispute/" rel="bookmark" title="August 28, 2009">paidContent:UK: Italian Competition Authority searches Google&#8217;s Milan offices in newspaper dispute</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/04/03/twitter-workshop-for-journalists-shared-courtesy-of-globe-mails-matthew-ingram/" rel="bookmark" title="April 3, 2009">Twitter workshop for journalists shared &#8211; courtesy of Globe &#038; Mail&#8217;s Matthew Ingram</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/19/times-online-google-shows-support-for-local-newspaper-mergers/" rel="bookmark" title="May 19, 2009">Times Online: Google shows support for local newspaper mergers</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 9.053 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/12/18/gigaom-wsj-failed-the-web-20-test-with-google-story/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Googleblog: archived newspapers going online</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/09/googleblog-archived-newspapers-going-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/09/googleblog-archived-newspapers-going-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 11:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Archiving]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search results]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2008/09/bringing-history-online-one-newspaper.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Google is making it their mission to make old newspapers available online. They will partner with newspaper publishers to digitize millions of pages of news archives, and hope to make more newspapers accessible and searchable online. In time
these archives will be blended into their main Google search results.
]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/09/googleblog-archived-newspapers-going-online/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Googleblog: archived newspapers going online">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Google is making it its mission to make old newspapers available online. The search giant will partner with newspaper publishers to digitize millions of pages of news archives, and hopes to make more newspapers accessible and searchable online. In time<br />
these archives will be blended into the main Google search results.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/10/05/google-search-looks-to-bloggers/" rel="bookmark" title="October 5, 2007">Google search looks to bloggers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/05/fipp-09-fears-ahead-for-magazines-what-concerns-those-at-the-top/" rel="bookmark" title="May 5, 2009">FIPP 09: Fears ahead for magazines &#8211; what concerns those at the top?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/01/18/deutsche-welle-german-news-publishers-file-google-complaint/" rel="bookmark" title="January 18, 2010">Deutsche Welle: German news publishers file Google complaint</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/03/31/poynter-googles-new-1-social-search-and-news-publishers/" rel="bookmark" title="March 31, 2011">Poynter: Google&#8217;s new +1 social search and news publishers</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/07/05/google-launches-what-do-you-love-search/" rel="bookmark" title="July 5, 2011">Google launches What Do You Love search</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 10.008 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/09/09/googleblog-archived-newspapers-going-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Belgian newspapers seeking £39m damages from Google</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/28/belgian-newspapers-seeking-39m-damages-from-google/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/28/belgian-newspapers-seeking-39m-damages-from-google/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 10:13:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Luft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Belgium]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bloomberg]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brussels]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brussels court]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[copyright law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[EUR]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Google News service]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search giant publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[secretary-general]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[spokesperson]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/28/belgian-newspapers-seeking-39m-damages-from-google/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet A group of Belgian newspapers are seeking up to £39m (€49m) in damages from Google for the search giant publishing and storing their content without permission or offering payment. Last year Google lost a case brought against it by the Copiepresse group &#8211; an organisation that represents the French language press in Belgium &#8211; [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/28/belgian-newspapers-seeking-39m-damages-from-google/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Belgian newspapers seeking £39m damages from Google">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>A group of Belgian newspapers are seeking up to £39m (€49m) in damages from Google for the search giant publishing and storing their content without permission or offering payment.</p>
<p>Last year Google lost a case brought against it by the Copiepresse group &#8211; an organisation that represents the French language press in Belgium &#8211; forcing it to remove cached versions of newspaper articles and take down content from its Google News service</p>
<p>The organisation’s secretary-general told <a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&amp;sid=aGOuwazIIAGA">Bloomberg</a> yesterday it had summoned Google to appear again before a Brussels court so that it could decide on the damages. Copiepresse is seeking between €32.8 and 49.1m.</p>
<p>The damages would be in addition to the €25,000 (£20,000) daily fine imposed on Google by the court for each day it kept Copiepresse material on its site.</p>
<p>Google appealed the original court decision of February 2007, which ruled that it could not claim ‘fair use’ &#8211; acceptable under copyright law – for using a lines of text and linking to the original article.</p>
<p>A Google spokesperson told Bloomberg that it was still awaiting the results of its appeal and that it had not received notification from Copiepresse of any new court dates.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/07/03/belgian-newspaper-group-to-take-european-commission-to-court-again-after-its-first-challenge-over-news-aggregator-fails/" rel="bookmark" title="July 3, 2008">Belgian newspaper group to take European Commission to court again after its first challenge over news aggregator fails</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/04/dna09-aggregators-friend-or-foe-unfair-competition-says-copiepresse/" rel="bookmark" title="March 4, 2009">DNA09: Aggregators &#8211; friend or foe? Unfair competition, says Copiepresse</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2012/02/21/guardian-ryan-giggs-named-in-court-as-injunction-footballer/" rel="bookmark" title="February 21, 2012">Guardian: Ryan Giggs named in court as injunction footballer</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/17/google-ads-round-up-the-changes-explained-in-links/" rel="bookmark" title="March 17, 2009">Google Ads round-up &#8211; the changes explained in links</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/10/french-court-finds-website-guilty-of-privacy-breach-for-linking/" rel="bookmark" title="April 10, 2008">French court finds website guilty of privacy breach for linking</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.599 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/28/belgian-newspapers-seeking-39m-damages-from-google/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Toronto Star: Google News respects copyright, says content specialist</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/12/toronto-star-google-news-respects-copyright-says-content-specialist/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/12/toronto-star-google-news-respects-copyright-says-content-specialist/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:11:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Luft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[content specialist]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Copyright]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Josh Cohen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search giant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Toronto Star]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Toronto Star]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/12/toronto-star-google-news-respects-copyright-says-content-specialist/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Google News respects copyright and is not looking to move into content creation, Josh Cohen, content specialist for the search giant&#8217;s news channel, has said in a Q&#38;A with the Toronto Star. &#8220;&#8230;[I]t&#8217;s really about helping people to find the content that&#8217;s out there. We just don&#8217;t see ourselves as content creators. We&#8217;re more [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/12/toronto-star-google-news-respects-copyright-says-content-specialist/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Toronto Star: Google News respects copyright, says content specialist">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Google News respects copyright and is not looking to move into content creation, Josh Cohen, content specialist for the search giant&#8217;s news channel, has said in a Q&amp;A with the Toronto Star.</p>
<p>&#8220;&#8230;[I]t&#8217;s really about helping people to find the content that&#8217;s out there. We just don&#8217;t see ourselves as content creators. We&#8217;re more of a platform for that content,&#8221; he said.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/03/insite-finding-the-people-behind-sites-an-insite-guide/" rel="bookmark" title="February 3, 2009">Insite: Finding the people behind sites &#8211; an insite guide</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/08/online-video-reuters-wants-to-offer-more-raw-video-to-clients/" rel="bookmark" title="March 8, 2010">Online video: Reuters wants to offer more raw video to clients</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/08/25/tip-of-the-day-from-journalism-co-uk-photo-resources/" rel="bookmark" title="August 25, 2010">#Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; photo resources</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/02/22/tip-of-the-day-from-journalism-co-uk-twitter-verification/" rel="bookmark" title="February 22, 2011">#Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; Twitter verification</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2012/03/23/bbcs-sports-editor-on-social-media-and-the-olympics-theres-an-illusion-around-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="March 23, 2012">BBC&#8217;s sports editor on social media and the Olympics: &#8216;There&#8217;s an illusion around Twitter&#8217;</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.534 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/05/12/toronto-star-google-news-respects-copyright-says-content-specialist/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

