Aggregator Meltwater and the Public Relations Consultants Association (PRCA) have said they remain confident that the courts will support their case in the dispute with the Newspaper Licensing Agency (NLA) over new licence fees, despite the NLA’s decision to take the matter to the High Court.
Yesterday the NLA said it had started proceedings against Meltwater and the PRCA to help speed up the process of determining whether its new licences – introduced in January, which affect commercial services using links to its newspaper members’ content – are legal. Meltwater and the PRCA have referred the licences and the NLA to a Copyright Tribunal, but the agency is concerned that the Tribunal does not have the powers to make the ultimate decision on the licences’ legality.
Having initially learned about the NLA’s decision to take Meltwater and the PRCA to court through the press, both parties have only just received the papers concerning this claim.
While we understand that the industry will want clarification on this issue, we do not see this development as cause for concern.
Naturally, we are reviewing the papers in consultation with our legal advisors. But not wishing to prejudice our case with the Copyright Tribunal, which we believe to be strong, we will study the NLA’s claim before responding.
We remain confident, however, that the NLA’s proposals for a web licence are flawed and that the courts will support our views on this.
Tags: aggregator, meltwater, newspaper licensing agency, NLA, online newspapers, PRCA, Public Relations Consultants Association
- NLA suspends payment of new link charges for aggregators
- paidContent:UK: Times Online blocks news aggregator Meltwater
- New German law may impose fees on aggregated content use
- Belgian newspaper group to take European Commission to court again after its first challenge over news aggregator fails
- PRCA launches petition against NLA’s backlink charging plans