<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Editors&#039; Blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk &#187; media trends</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/tag/media-trends/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>AOP: Today&#8217;s television &#8216;may not be worth sitting still for&#8217;, says US author Clay Shirky</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/02/aop-op-2008-todays-television-may-not-be-worth-sitting-still-for-says-us-author-clay-shirky/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/02/aop-op-2008-todays-television-may-not-be-worth-sitting-still-for-says-us-author-clay-shirky/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Oct 2008 12:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Events]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AOP Digital Publishing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Association of Online Publishers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Shirky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Clay Shirky Even]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[HSBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet educator]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet groupings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media professionals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media trends]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=3272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Even children can&#8217;t concentrate on television anymore, says Clay Shirky, the US-based internet educator, consultant and author of &#8216;Here comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations&#8217;. In his speech at yesterday&#8217;s AOP Digital Publishing summit Shirky told an anecdote about the four-year-old daughter of one of his friends watching a film: &#8220;[S]he jumps [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/02/aop-op-2008-todays-television-may-not-be-worth-sitting-still-for-says-us-author-clay-shirky/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="AOP: Today&#8217;s television &#8216;may not be worth sitting still for&#8217;, says US author Clay Shirky">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Even children can&#8217;t concentrate on television anymore, says <a href="http://www.shirky.com/" target="_blank">Clay Shirky</a>, the US-based internet educator, consultant and author of <a href="http://www.herecomeseverybody.org/" target="_blank">&#8216;Here comes Everybody: The Power of Organizing Without Organizations&#8217;</a>.</p>
<p>In his speech at yesterday&#8217;s <a href="https://www.ukaopevents.org.uk/aop/frontend/reg/thome.csp?pageID=3926&amp;CSPCHDx=0000000000000&amp;ef_sel_menu=69&amp;eventID=16&amp;eventID=16" target="_blank">AOP Digital Publishing summit</a> Shirky told an anecdote about the four-year-old daughter of one of his friends watching a film: &#8220;[S]he jumps round behind the TV and [starts] rooting around in the wires, looking for the mouse.&#8221;</p>
<p>Today&#8217;s television &#8216;may not be worth sitting still for&#8217;, but the computer is for everything.</p>
<p>The problem for media professionals is that the industry still holds the perception that everyone sees publishing in the same way, he explained.</p>
<p>But, he said, citing the example of Flickr, material may be &#8216;in public but [it's] not for the public. The cost of putting something out in public has fallen so low.&#8217;</p>
<p>&#8220;This is a reversal of the usual pattern,&#8221; he said. &#8216;Gather and share has been the usual pattern [of publishing] since time immemorial&#8217;, but now grouping comes first.</p>
<p>He split his talk into three categories: the sharing culture of Flickr; the collaborative nature of Wikipedia; and the collective action of internet groupings, citing the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/money/2007/aug/25/moneysupplement.studentfinance" target="_blank">use of a Facebook group to force HSBC to reverse its decision on withdrawing students&#8217; interest-free overdrafts</a>.</p>
<p>These examples, he said, show the &#8216;the environment that&#8217;s coming&#8217; and a need to re-think the model&#8217;.</p>
<p>&#8220;If you wait to hear what the business model is you will hear that your competitors have perfected it,&#8221; he said.</p>
<p>Shirky compared today&#8217;s media trends to London&#8217;s <a href="http://www.herecomeseverybody.org/2008/04/looking-for-the-mouse.html" target="_blank">17th-century gin craze</a>: at first people didn&#8217;t know what to do with what they were consuming, but they then learnt how to share, collaborate and collect.</p>
<p>&#8220;The action is where people are going after the consumers. Not just consuming, but producing and sharing.&#8221;</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/16/clay-shirky-the-old-models-broken-dont-try-to-replace/" rel="bookmark" title="March 16, 2009">Clay Shirky: The old model&#8217;s broken &#8211; don&#8217;t try to replace it</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/05/clay-shirky-rescuing-the-reporters/" rel="bookmark" title="October 5, 2009">Clay Shirky: &#8216;Rescuing the reporters&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/06/28/nieman-journalism-lab-clay-shirkys-cognitive-surplus/" rel="bookmark" title="June 28, 2010">Nieman Journalism Lab: Clay Shirky&#8217;s &#8216;Cognitive Surplus&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/02/04/clay-shirky-wikileaks-has-created-a-new-media-landscape/" rel="bookmark" title="February 4, 2011">Clay Shirky: WikiLeaks has created a new media landscape</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/11/09/clay-shirky-on-the-times-paywall-commodity-markets-and-a-referendum-on-the-future/" rel="bookmark" title="November 9, 2010">Clay Shirky on the Times paywall, commodity markets and a &#8216;referendum on the future&#8217;</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.937 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/02/aop-op-2008-todays-television-may-not-be-worth-sitting-still-for-says-us-author-clay-shirky/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

