DNA09: Twitter – a few more questions for the panel
A couple of crowd-sourced questions were taken by the Twitter panel, but some were missed. We’ll post them here and hope the panelists will answer them via Twitter or in the comments below.
- Noodlepie: @jamierussell be interested to know if the panel are looking at ways to increase “retweetness”. Very big traffic driver, no? #dna09 #dna140
- gemmanewby: #dna140 do you think it possible to make an entire news programme using only twitter and first person tweets as your source?
- ernstpoulsen: Question: What’s the difference between the conversation on twitter and facebook’s status-updates? #dna140 dna#09
Journalism.co.uk’s very own @lauraoliver was on a panel led by Wired UK’s associate editor @benhammersley at Digital News Affairs 2009. The others were Jeff Jarvis, blogger at BuzzMachine (@jeffjarvis); Robin Hamman, senior social media consultant at Headshift (@cybersoc); Darren Waters, technology editor at BBC News website (@darrenwaters); Bert Brouwers, editor-in-chief of Sp!ts (@brewbart); Katharina Borchert, editor-in-chief of Der Westen and MD of WAZ media (@lyssaslounge).
Tags: associate editor, BBC News, Bert Brouwers, Darren Waters, Der Westen, Digital News Affairs 2009, dna09, dna2009, editor-in-chief, Headshift, Jeff Jarvis, Journalism.co.uk, katharina borchert, Maryland, Robin Hamman, senior social media consultant, Sp!, technology editor, traffic driver, Twitter

