<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Editors&#039; Blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk &#187; Gawker</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/tag/gawker/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 25 May 2012 15:55:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Nieman Journalism Lab: MinnPost editor on new audience building strategy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/15/nieman-journalism-lab-minnpost-editor-on-new-audience-building-strategy/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/15/nieman-journalism-lab-minnpost-editor-on-new-audience-building-strategy/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2010 15:15:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Gunter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[joel kramer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metric]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MinnPost]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reader affection]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=20659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Valuing returning readers over vagrant visitors, a strategy extolled by Gawker a few weeks back and termed &#8220;reader affection&#8221;, has caught on at non-profit investigative site MinnPost. Speaking at the ASNE NewsNow Ideas Summit this week, editor Joel Kramer announced that MinnPost is also a fan of the affection metric, and aims to build [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/15/nieman-journalism-lab-minnpost-editor-on-new-audience-building-strategy/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Nieman Journalism Lab: MinnPost editor on new audience building strategy">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Valuing returning readers over vagrant visitors, <a title="Gawker announces new affection metric" href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2010/03/31/nieman-journalism-lab-gawkers-new-traffic-metric-measures-reader-affection/" target="_blank">a strategy extolled by Gawker a few weeks back and termed &#8220;reader affection&#8221;</a>, has caught on at non-profit investigative site <a title="MinnPost" href="http://www.minnpost.com/" target="_blank">MinnPost</a>. Speaking at the <a href="http://asne.org/annual_conference/1-annualconference.aspx">ASNE  NewsNow Ideas Summit</a> this week, editor Joel Kramer announced that MinnPost is also a fan of the affection metric, and aims to build up a &#8220;community of intensely engaged followers&#8221;. From Nieman:</p>
<blockquote><p>The strategy, for MinnPost, is a financial as much as an editorial one:  It’s about concentrating impact, but also about monetising that impact.  The outlet&#8217;s ultimate goal in developing a core readership, Kramer said,  is to &#8220;convert that community into enough money to sustain the  journalism&#8221;.</p></blockquote>
<p><a title="Nieman Journalism Lab - MinnPost audience strategy" href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/04/intensely-engaged-followers-joel-kramer-on-minnposts-focused-audienced-building-strategy/" target="_blank">Full story at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p>Read <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/5/articles/535183.php" target="_blank">Journalism.co.uk&#8217;s interview with Kramer at this link</a>.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/26/nieman-journalism-lab-minnpost-trials-real-time-advertising/" rel="bookmark" title="June 26, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: MinnPost trials &#8216;real-time&#8217; advertising</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/04/minnpost-moves-real-time-ads-out-of-beta/" rel="bookmark" title="September 4, 2009">MinnPost moves &#8216;Real-Time&#8217; ads out of beta</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/06/11/beatbloggingorg-not-for-profit-minnpost-news-site-raises-13190-in-micro-donations/" rel="bookmark" title="June 11, 2009">Beatblogging.org: Not-for-profit MinnPost news site raises $13,190 in micro-donations</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/nieman-journalism-lab-gawkers-new-traffic-metric-measures-reader-affection/" rel="bookmark" title="March 31, 2010">Nieman Journalism Lab: Gawker&#8217;s new traffic metric measures &#8216;reader affection&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/18/nieman-journalism-lab-minnpost-and-blog-micro-sponsorship/" rel="bookmark" title="March 18, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: MinnPost and blog &#8216;micro-sponsorship&#8217;</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.562 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/15/nieman-journalism-lab-minnpost-editor-on-new-audience-building-strategy/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nieman Journalism Lab: Barriers to entry can improve quality and quantity of reader comments, says Gawker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/14/nieman-journalism-lab-barriers-to-entry-can-improve-quality-and-quantity-of-reader-comments-says-gawker/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/14/nieman-journalism-lab-barriers-to-entry-can-improve-quality-and-quantity-of-reader-comments-says-gawker/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 08:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reader comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Plunkett]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=20581</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet In 2009, blog network Gawker Media introduced a new, stricter commenting system in an attempt to free the site from certain readers who were dominating comment threads. Nieman Journalism Lab has the full rundown of how the system now works, which includes trusted commenters having greater access to discussions and most recent comments placed [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/14/nieman-journalism-lab-barriers-to-entry-can-improve-quality-and-quantity-of-reader-comments-says-gawker/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Nieman Journalism Lab: Barriers to entry can improve quality and quantity of reader comments, says Gawker">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>In 2009, blog network Gawker Media introduced a new, stricter commenting system in an attempt to free the site from certain readers who were dominating comment threads. Nieman Journalism Lab has the full rundown of how the system now works, which includes trusted commenters having greater access to discussions and most recent comments placed at the top rather than bottom of threads to steer discussion.</p>
<p>&#8220;We&#8217;ll be able to encourage the kind of discussion that *we* want &#8211; not one that is dominated merely by the most prolific of our commenters. It&#8217;s our party; we get to decide who comes,&#8221; <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/07/with-ad-revenue-up-35-gawker-media-returns-to-pageview-bonuses-and-plans-checkbook-journalism/" target="_blank">wrote founder Nick Denton at the time</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://thomped.com/post/518529176/gawker-media-comment-volume-eoy-2005-to-date" target="_blank">A graph on the blog of Gawker Media chief technology officer Tom Plunkett</a> shows an initial dip in comment volume when the changes were first made, followed by a steep incline:</p>
<blockquote><p>Though there were some calls to do so, purging commenter accounts is not a solution for the out-of-control commenter community. Nor is a large moderation staff. We believe pruning, and a commenting platform as we have implemented, will lead to increased participation, while at the same time encouraging quality. This data, and the subjective opinion of many, seem to back this assertion.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/04/tough-love-gawker-finds-making-it-harder-for-comments-to-be-seen-leads-to-more-and-better-comments/" target="_blank">Full Nieman Journalism Lab report at this link&#8230;<br />
</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/15/nieman-journalism-lab-gawker-stirs-up-online-commenting-with-new-tips-tags/" rel="bookmark" title="October 15, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: Gawker stirs up online commenting with new #tips tags</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/12/01/poynter-ny-times-introduces-unmoderated-comments-for-trusted-commenters/" rel="bookmark" title="December 1, 2011">Poynter: NY Times introduces unmoderated comments for &#8216;trusted commenters&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/06/08/wordpress-rolls-out-twitter-and-facebook-comments-options/" rel="bookmark" title="June 8, 2011">WordPress rolls out Twitter and Facebook comments options</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/26/telegraph-writer-attacks-spooky-lib-dem-posse-for-critical-comments/" rel="bookmark" title="April 26, 2010">Telegraph writer attacks &#8216;spooky&#8217; Lib Dem &#8216;posse&#8217; for critical comments</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/16/comment-central-new-commenting-system-for-times-online/" rel="bookmark" title="July 16, 2009">Comment Central: New commenting system for Times Online</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.651 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/14/nieman-journalism-lab-barriers-to-entry-can-improve-quality-and-quantity-of-reader-comments-says-gawker/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nieman Journalism Lab: Gawker&#8217;s new traffic metric measures &#8216;reader affection&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/nieman-journalism-lab-gawkers-new-traffic-metric-measures-reader-affection/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/nieman-journalism-lab-gawkers-new-traffic-metric-measures-reader-affection/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:56:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Gunter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Handy tools and technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branded traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[direct search]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[metrics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nieman journalism lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pageviews]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search queries]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[search referrals]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[unique visitors]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=20314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet While others pour over pageviews and underscore uniques, Gawker Media has been quietly working on a new metric, one designed to measure so-called &#8220;reader affection&#8221;. This new metric is called &#8220;branded traffic&#8221; and is, according to Nieman Journalism Lab, &#8220;both more nebulous and more significant&#8221; than traditional forms of measurement. The idea is to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/nieman-journalism-lab-gawkers-new-traffic-metric-measures-reader-affection/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Nieman Journalism Lab: Gawker&#8217;s new traffic metric measures &#8216;reader affection&#8217;">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>While others pour over pageviews and underscore uniques, Gawker Media has been quietly working on a new metric, one designed to measure so-called &#8220;reader affection&#8221;. This new metric is called &#8220;branded traffic&#8221; and is, according to Nieman Journalism Lab, &#8220;both more nebulous and more significant&#8221; than traditional forms of measurement.</p>
<p>The idea is to measure the number of visitors that arrive at the site via a direct search for its name or variations on its branding, or by typing in the site URL directly, and distinguish them from more incidental traffic.</p>
<blockquote><p>The metric comes from a simple compound: direct type-in visits plus  branded search queries in Google Analytics. In other words, Gawker Media is bifurcating its visitors in its  evaluation of them, splitting them into two groups: the occasional  audience, you might call it, and the core audience.</p></blockquote>
<p>The original Gawker release highlights the value the site places on turning the internet passerby into an affectionate reader:</p>
<blockquote><p>While distributing content across the web is essential for attracting  the interest of internet passersby, courting these wanderers, massaging  them into occasional visitors, and finally gaining their affection as  daily readers is far more important. This core audience &#8211; borne of a  compounding of word of mouth, search referrals, article recommendations,  and successive enjoyed visits that result in regular readership &#8211;  drives our rich site cultures and premium advertising products.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2010/03/a-reader-affection-formula-gawker-creates-a-metric-for-branded-traffic/" target="_blank">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/15/nieman-journalism-lab-minnpost-editor-on-new-audience-building-strategy/" rel="bookmark" title="April 15, 2010">Nieman Journalism Lab: MinnPost editor on new audience building strategy</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/07/07/poynter-five-ways-to-turn-traffic-spikes-into-return-visits/" rel="bookmark" title="July 7, 2011">Poynter: Five ways to turn traffic spikes into return visits</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/11/06/soe-guardian-reporter-planning-to-use-hitwise-figures-in-telegraph-marketing-again/" rel="bookmark" title="November 6, 2007">@SoE: Guardian reporter: planning to use Hitwise figures in Telegraph marketing again?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/04/big-numbers-vs-local-audience-what-should-regional-newspapers-chase/" rel="bookmark" title="March 4, 2010">Big numbers vs local audience &#8211; what should regional newspapers chase?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/15/gawker-gawker-to-sell-three-blogs-from-its-network/" rel="bookmark" title="April 15, 2008">Gawker: Gawker to sell three blogs from its network</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.459 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/nieman-journalism-lab-gawkers-new-traffic-metric-measures-reader-affection/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Media Beat: Former Gawker managing editor talks niches and revenue streams</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/media-beat-former-gawker-managing-editor-talks-niches-and-revenue-streams/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/media-beat-former-gawker-managing-editor-talks-niches-and-revenue-streams/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Mar 2010 13:19:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joel Gunter</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[curbed network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[lockheart steele]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mediabistro media beat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Niche]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=20312</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Dramatically named blogger and journalism entrepreneur Lockhart Steele has guested on mediabistro&#8217;s Media Beat video series in the last two days, with the last episode appearing later this afternoon. Steele began blogging around the beginning of the decade while working in magazines. He was recruited by Nick Denton as Gawker began to pick up [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/media-beat-former-gawker-managing-editor-talks-niches-and-revenue-streams/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Media Beat: Former Gawker managing editor talks niches and revenue streams">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Dramatically named blogger and journalism entrepreneur <a title="Lockheart Steele" href="http://lockhartsteele.com/" target="_blank">Lockhart Steele</a> has guested on mediabistro&#8217;s <a title="MediaBeat.com" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/news/media_beat/" target="_blank">Media Beat</a> video series in the last two days, with the last episode appearing later this afternoon. Steele began blogging around the beginning of the decade while working in magazines. He was recruited by <a title="Nick Denton" href="http://nickdenton.org/" target="_blank">Nick Denton</a> as <a title="Gawker" href="http://gawker.com/" target="_blank">Gawker</a> began to pick up traffic and later became managing editor of the site, seeing it expand from just a handful of editorial staff to around 150.</p>
<p>In the second installment of the Media Beat series, below, Steele discusses getting traffic through Twitter and Facebook, diversifying revenue streams online, and &#8220;looking for niches where we can be a little bit weird&#8221;.</p>
<p><object id="flashObj" classid="clsid:d27cdb6e-ae6d-11cf-96b8-444553540000" width="540" height="358" codebase="http://download.macromedia.com/pub/shockwave/cabs/flash/swflash.cab#version=6,0,40,0"><param name="bgcolor" value="#FFFFFF" /><param name="flashVars" value="videoId=74143692001&amp;playerID=57408845001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" /><param name="base" value="http://admin.brightcove.com" /><param name="seamlesstabbing" value="false" /><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true" /><param name="swLiveConnect" value="true" /><param name="allowScriptAccess" value="always" /><param name="src" value="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/57408845001?isVid=1&amp;publisherID=1408993889" /><param name="name" value="flashObj" /><param name="flashvars" value="videoId=74143692001&amp;playerID=57408845001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" /><param name="allowfullscreen" value="true" /><embed id="flashObj" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="540" height="358" src="http://c.brightcove.com/services/viewer/federated_f9/57408845001?isVid=1&amp;publisherID=1408993889" name="flashObj" allowscriptaccess="always" swliveconnect="true" allowfullscreen="true" seamlesstabbing="false" base="http://admin.brightcove.com" flashvars="videoId=74143692001&amp;playerID=57408845001&amp;domain=embed&amp;" bgcolor="#FFFFFF"></embed></object></p>
<p><a title="FishbowlNY: Lockheart Steele on Media Beat" href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/media_beat/media_beat_lockhart_steele_on_nick_denton_i_loved_working_for_him_156612.asp" target="_blank">Follow this link for the first installment, in which Steele discusses starting out in blogging and breaking away from Gawker to establish his own blogging network</a>.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/04/15/gawker-gawker-to-sell-three-blogs-from-its-network/" rel="bookmark" title="April 15, 2008">Gawker: Gawker to sell three blogs from its network</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/mediabistro-new-gawker-tv-powered-by-interns-hopes-site-will-sell-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="November 5, 2009">Mediabistro: New Gawker.TV powered by interns; hopes site will sell ads</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/01/21/wired-q-and-a-with-gawkers-nick-denton-2/" rel="bookmark" title="January 21, 2008">Wired: Q and A with Gawker&#8217;s Nick Denton</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/04/13/mashable-how-paywalls-are-changing-social-media-strategies/" rel="bookmark" title="April 13, 2011">Mashable: How paywalls are changing social media strategies</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2012/03/08/qa-with-hyperlocal-site-boasting-15000-newsletter-subscribers/" rel="bookmark" title="March 8, 2012">Q&amp;A with hyperlocal site boasting 15,000 newsletter subscribers</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.231 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/media-beat-former-gawker-managing-editor-talks-niches-and-revenue-streams/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mediabistro: New Gawker.TV powered by interns; hopes site will sell ads</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/mediabistro-new-gawker-tv-powered-by-interns-hopes-site-will-sell-ads/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/mediabistro-new-gawker-tv-powered-by-interns-hopes-site-will-sell-ads/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 08:39:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[us]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15655</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Mediabistro.com reports on the launch of a new spin-off site for Gawker &#8211; a video website, Gawker.TV, manned by around 16 interns working under a video editor. Videos are a big traffic driver for Gawker and founder Nick Denton has admitted that selling ads will be easier on a site with a less specific [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/mediabistro-new-gawker-tv-powered-by-interns-hopes-site-will-sell-ads/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Mediabistro: New Gawker.TV powered by interns; hopes site will sell ads">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Mediabistro.com reports on the launch of a new spin-off site for Gawker &#8211; a video website, <a href="http://tv.gawker.com/" target="_blank">Gawker.TV</a>, manned by around 16 interns working under a video editor.</p>
<p>Videos are a big traffic driver for Gawker and founder Nick Denton has admitted that selling ads will be easier on a site with a less specific focus, according to Mediabistro.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/new_media/gawkertv_launches_with_intern_workforce_optimistic_about_ad_sales_142095.asp">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/02/27/fishbowl-ny-sacked-gawker-editor-says-dentons-role-is-a-conflict-of-interest/" rel="bookmark" title="February 27, 2008">Fishbowl NY: Sacked Gawker editor says Denton&#8217;s role is a conflict of interest</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/28/nick-denton-gawker-revenues-up-45-per-cent-in-first-half-of-2009/" rel="bookmark" title="July 28, 2009">Nick Denton: Gawker revenues up 45 per cent in first half of 2009</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/23/defamergawkercom-defamer-folds-into-gawker/" rel="bookmark" title="February 23, 2009">Defamer.gawker.com: Defamer &#8216;folds into&#8217; Gawker</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/31/media-beat-former-gawker-managing-editor-talks-niches-and-revenue-streams/" rel="bookmark" title="March 31, 2010">Media Beat: Former Gawker managing editor talks niches and revenue streams</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/03/why-nick-denton-wouldnt-set-up-shop-in-uk/" rel="bookmark" title="July 3, 2009">Why Nick Denton wouldn&#8217;t set up shop in UK</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.324 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/mediabistro-new-gawker-tv-powered-by-interns-hopes-site-will-sell-ads/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker: Crowdsourcing a translation of GQ&#8217;s Putin article</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/07/gawker-crowdsourcing-a-translation-of-gqs-putin-article/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/07/gawker-crowdsourcing-a-translation-of-gqs-putin-article/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 08:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Press freedom and ethics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conde Nast]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[crowdsourcing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GQ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism. co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Vladimir Putin]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=13726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Last week Gawker asked readers to help it translate an article into Russian from Conde Nast&#8217;s GQ, which the publisher reportedly went to great lengths to prevent from being read in Russia, because it contained criticisms of Vladimir Putin. A full translation of the article has been completed and the process behind it can [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/07/gawker-crowdsourcing-a-translation-of-gqs-putin-article/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Gawker: Crowdsourcing a translation of GQ&#8217;s Putin article">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Last week Gawker asked readers to help it translate an article into Russian from Conde Nast&#8217;s GQ, which <a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=112530364" target="_blank">the publisher reportedly went to great lengths to prevent from being read in Russia</a>, because it contained criticisms of Vladimir Putin.</p>
<p>A full translation of the article has been completed and <a href="http://gawker.com/5352827/" target="_blank">the process behind it can be read about at this link</a>.</p>
<p>Issues of copyright and press freedom arise from this &#8211; Journalism.co.uk will be contacting Gawker to find out more.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/09/14/new-york-times-no-justice-for-anna-politkovskaya/" rel="bookmark" title="September 14, 2011">New York Times: No Justice for Anna Politkovskaya</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/07/journalism-daily-more-on-online-sub-editing-and-public-interest-journalism/" rel="bookmark" title="September 7, 2009">Journalism Daily: More on online sub-editing and public interest journalism</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/11/25/tip-of-the-day-from-journalism-co-uk-advice-on-copyright-and-how-to-claim-for-breach/" rel="bookmark" title="November 25, 2011">#Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; advice on copyright and how to claim for breach</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/washington-post/" rel="bookmark" title="August 3, 2009">Washington Post: &#8216;Whiny WashPost Reporter Makes His Point: Respect the Genuine Article&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/22/daily-finance-conde-nast-brings-in-consultants-to-rethink-business/" rel="bookmark" title="July 22, 2009">Daily Finance: Conde Nast brings in consultants to &#8216;rethink business&#8217;</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.598 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/07/gawker-crowdsourcing-a-translation-of-gqs-putin-article/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Felix Salmon: Gawker sums show why it&#8217;s a &#8216;highly profitable media co.&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/04/felix-salmon-gawker-sums-show-why-its-a-highly-profitable-media-co/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/04/felix-salmon-gawker-sums-show-why-its-a-highly-profitable-media-co/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Aug 2009 09:49:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix Salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nieman journalism lab]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profitable media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[profitable media co.]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reuters]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12738</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Over at the Reuters blog, Felix Salmon does some calculations about Gawker and blog profitability, following a post on the Nieman Journalism Lab. &#8220;(&#8230;) overall it&#8217;s easy to see how Gawker has now grown to the point at which it&#8217;s a highly profitable media company.&#8221; Full post at this link&#8230; Similar Posts:Seeking Alpha: the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/04/felix-salmon-gawker-sums-show-why-its-a-highly-profitable-media-co/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Felix Salmon: Gawker sums show why it&#8217;s a &#8216;highly profitable media co.&#8217;">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Over at the Reuters blog, Felix Salmon does some calculations about Gawker and blog profitability, following a post <a href="http://www.niemanlab.org/2009/08/gawker-and-the-washington-post-a-case-study-in-fair-use/" target="_blank">on the Nieman Journalism Lab</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;(&#8230;) overall it&#8217;s easy to see how Gawker has now grown to the point at which it&#8217;s a highly profitable media company.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://blogs.reuters.com/felix-salmon/2009/08/03/gawker-math/">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/14/seeking-alpha-the-end-of-micropublishing-in-the-blogosphere/" rel="bookmark" title="November 14, 2008">Seeking Alpha: the end of micropublishing in the blogosphere?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/29/vanityfair-com-business-insiders-henry-blodget-vs-reuters-felix-salmon/" rel="bookmark" title="March 29, 2010">Vanityfair.com: Business Insider&#8217;s Henry Blodget vs Reuters&#8217; Felix Salmon</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/01/22/felix-salmon-online-subscription-revenues-wont-make-newspapers-profitable-again/" rel="bookmark" title="January 22, 2010">Felix Salmon: &#8216;Online subscription revenues won&#8217;t make newspapers profitable again&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/14/felix-salmon-on-business-journalism-and-business-blogging/" rel="bookmark" title="April 14, 2010">Felix Salmon: On business journalism and business blogging</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2012/03/12/is-cnn-about-to-buy-mashable/" rel="bookmark" title="March 12, 2012">Is CNN about to buy Mashable?</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.245 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/04/felix-salmon-gawker-sums-show-why-its-a-highly-profitable-media-co/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Washington Post: &#8216;Whiny WashPost Reporter Makes His Point: Respect the Genuine Article&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/washington-post/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/washington-post/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 03 Aug 2009 10:13:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Loehr]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[author]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[branding consultant]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ian Shapira]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Washington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Whiny WashPost Reporter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12683</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Well, that&#8217;s Ian Shapira&#8217;s suggested headline for a follow-up story on Gawker, after the site picked up on and heavily excerpted his story on &#8216;branding consultant&#8217; Anne Loehr. Gawker included a link to his original article &#8211; but only at the very bottom of the post. Shapira&#8217;s initial happiness at having his story featured [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/washington-post/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Washington Post: &#8216;Whiny WashPost Reporter Makes His Point: Respect the Genuine Article&#8217;">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Well, that&#8217;s Ian Shapira&#8217;s suggested headline for a follow-up story on Gawker, after <a href="http://gawker.com/5310986/generational-consultant-holds-americas-fakest-job" target="_blank">the site picked up on and heavily excerpted</a> his <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/08/AR2009070803986.html">story on &#8216;branding consultant&#8217; Anne Loehr</a>.</p>
<p>Gawker included a link to his original article &#8211; but only at the very bottom of the post.</p>
<p>Shapira&#8217;s initial happiness at having his story featured on Gawker turned to disillusion as he questioned the benefits of traffic driven by Gawker to his original piece, <a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/31/AR2009073102476.html" target="_blank">he writes in a follow-up piece</a>.</p>
<p>Gawker may make money from advertising around its aggregation of original reporting from other sources, which have invested time and money into the report, but does a spike in traffic help the Washington Post&#8217;s bottom line, he asks.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;After talking with Denton [Nick Denton, Gawker founder], Nolan [Hamilton Nolan, the Gawker author] and others for this article, I still want a fluid blogosphere, but one where aggregators &#8211; newspapers included &#8211; are more transparent about whom they&#8217;re heavily excerpting. They should mention the original source immediately. And if bloggers want to excerpt at length, a fee would be the nice, ethical gesture,&#8221; he writes.</p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/31/AR2009073102476.html" target="_blank">Full article at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/14/paidcontent-org-the-fallacy-of-the-link-economy-for-news-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="August 14, 2009">paidContent.org: &#8216;The fallacy of the link economy&#8217; for news sites</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/10/citizen-media-law-project-the-laws-of-news-aggregation/" rel="bookmark" title="September 10, 2010">Citizen Media Law Project: The laws of news aggregation</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/18/public-agenda-private-newspapers-in-africa-hit-by-advertising-slump/" rel="bookmark" title="August 18, 2009">Public Agenda: Private newspapers in Africa hit by advertising slump</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/" rel="bookmark" title="October 8, 2008">Gawker alleges computer cut-backs for WSJ.com staff</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/mediabistro-new-gawker-tv-powered-by-interns-hopes-site-will-sell-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="November 5, 2009">Mediabistro: New Gawker.TV powered by interns; hopes site will sell ads</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 6.369 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/washington-post/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Nick Denton: Gawker revenues up 45 per cent in first half of 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/28/nick-denton-gawker-revenues-up-45-per-cent-in-first-half-of-2009/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/28/nick-denton-gawker-revenues-up-45-per-cent-in-first-half-of-2009/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Jul 2009 09:45:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising apocalypse]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[advertising revenue]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IAC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internet brands]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Yahoo]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12484</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet The plunge has already been pretty terrifying for a range of companies from Yahoo and IAC to the newspapers,&#8221; writes Gawker founder Nick Denton, referring to his previous prediction that media companies should prepare for a 40 per cent downturn in advertising revenue over the economic cycle. &#8220;But I was wrong in one respect: [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/28/nick-denton-gawker-revenues-up-45-per-cent-in-first-half-of-2009/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Nick Denton: Gawker revenues up 45 per cent in first half of 2009">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>The plunge has already been pretty terrifying for a range of companies from Yahoo and IAC to the newspapers,&#8221; writes <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/tag/gawker/" target="_blank">Gawker</a> founder Nick Denton, referring to his previous prediction that media companies should prepare for a 40 per cent downturn in advertising revenue over the economic cycle.</p>
<p>&#8220;But I was wrong in one respect: a few premium internet brands, Gawker&#8217;s among them, have withstood the advertising apocalypse.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://nickdenton.org/5323836/">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/09/28/ad-age-internet-media-employment-at-peak-since-2001-despite-falls-elsewhere/" rel="bookmark" title="September 28, 2010">Ad Age: Internet media employment at peak since 2001 despite falls elsewhere</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/03/washington-post/" rel="bookmark" title="August 3, 2009">Washington Post: &#8216;Whiny WashPost Reporter Makes His Point: Respect the Genuine Article&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/13/jo-wadsworth-where-is-advertising-moving-online/" rel="bookmark" title="October 13, 2009">Jo Wadsworth: Where is advertising moving online?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/11/ernst-young-online-search-will-help-reverse-fortunes-of-display-and-classified-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="February 11, 2009">Ernst &#038; Young: Online search will help reverse fortunes of display and classified ads</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/12/paidcontentorg-condenet-cuts-stuff-across-all-departments/" rel="bookmark" title="November 12, 2008">paidContent.org: CondeNet cuts staff across all departments</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.949 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/28/nick-denton-gawker-revenues-up-45-per-cent-in-first-half-of-2009/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Why Nick Denton wouldn&#8217;t set up shop in UK</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/03/why-nick-denton-wouldnt-set-up-shop-in-uk/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/03/why-nick-denton-wouldnt-set-up-shop-in-uk/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 16:42:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brits]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Martin Stabe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[politico]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11750</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet From Politico: a report on a panel at the Institute&#8217;s Ideas Festival in Colarado, asking &#8216;What’s the News Worth to You?&#8217; For us Brits, this is the interesting part: &#8220;During the panel&#8217;s Q&#38;A, Gawker Media’s Nick Denton sarcastically thanked the American newspaper industry for being so unaggressive, making it possible for &#8216;thugs&#8217; like him [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/03/why-nick-denton-wouldnt-set-up-shop-in-uk/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Why Nick Denton wouldn&#8217;t set up shop in UK">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>From Politico: <a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24419.html#ixzz0KDNnHi9J&amp;C" target="_blank">a report on a panel</a> at the Institute&#8217;s Ideas Festival in Colarado, asking &#8216;What’s the News Worth to You?&#8217;</p>
<p>For us Brits, this is the interesting part:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;During the panel&#8217;s Q&amp;A, Gawker Media’s Nick Denton sarcastically thanked the American newspaper industry for being so unaggressive, making it possible for &#8216;thugs&#8217; like him to succeed.</p>
<p>&#8220;Conversely, Denton said he&#8217;d never set up shop in England. &#8216;Every single day, those editors get up and try to kill each other,&#8217; said Denton. Not so in the U.S.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>(<a href="http://www.martinstabe.com/blog/" target="_blank">Hat-tip: Martin Stabe</a>)</p>
<p><a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0709/24419.html"></a>.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/17/nytimescom-seattle-post-intelligencer-goes-web-only/" rel="bookmark" title="March 17, 2009">NYTimes.com: Seattle Post-Intelligencer goes web only</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/11/followjourn-martinstabeonline-editor/" rel="bookmark" title="September 11, 2009">#FollowJourn: @martinstabe/online editor</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/02/27/fishbowl-ny-sacked-gawker-editor-says-dentons-role-is-a-conflict-of-interest/" rel="bookmark" title="February 27, 2008">Fishbowl NY: Sacked Gawker editor says Denton&#8217;s role is a conflict of interest</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2007/09/28/video-blogging-hits-shropshire/" rel="bookmark" title="September 28, 2007">Video blogging hits Shropshire</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/07/21/does-guardian-world-cup-wall-show-a-nations-growing-interest-in-football/" rel="bookmark" title="July 21, 2010">Does Guardian &#8216;World Cup Wall&#8217; show a nation&#8217;s growing interest in football?</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.525 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/03/why-nick-denton-wouldnt-set-up-shop-in-uk/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>$15,500 minimum bid for HuffPo internship &#8211; a chance to &#8216;jumpstart your career in the blogosphere&#8217;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/14/15500-minimum-bid-for-huffpo-internship-a-chance-to-jumpstart-your-career-in-the-blogosphere/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/14/15500-minimum-bid-for-huffpo-internship-a-chance-to-jumpstart-your-career-in-the-blogosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 08:27:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anya Kamenetz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[auction]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[charity buzz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Emin]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[GBP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Huffington Post]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Journalism.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[London]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert F. Kennedy Center]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Street-Porter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USD]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[work experience]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=10274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet You know how media companies get a hard time for how they treat the &#8216;workies&#8217;? Especially because most internships are unpaid &#8211; you might get expenses if you&#8217;re lucky. Well, Huffington Post has gone one step futher, by putting up an internship for charity auction &#8211; offering bidders the chance to &#8216;jumpstart their career [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/14/15500-minimum-bid-for-huffpo-internship-a-chance-to-jumpstart-your-career-in-the-blogosphere/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="$15,500 minimum bid for HuffPo internship &#8211; a chance to &#8216;jumpstart your career in the blogosphere&#8217;">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>You know how media companies get a hard time for how they treat the &#8216;workies&#8217;? Especially because most internships are unpaid &#8211; you might get expenses if you&#8217;re lucky. Well, Huffington Post has gone one step futher, by putting up an internship for charity auction &#8211; offering bidders the chance to &#8216;jumpstart their career in the blogosphere&#8217;. <a href="https://auction01.charitybuzz.com/secure/viewItemDetail.do?auction_item_id=93263" target="_blank">Ten bids had been placed at the time of writing</a>; the last one was for $13,000. All proceeds go to the <a href="http://www.charitybuzz.com/area.do?id=932" target="_blank">Robert F. Kennedy Center for Justice and Human Rights</a>.</p>
<blockquote>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://gawker.com/5252905/huffpo-now-killing-journalism-by-literally-auctioning-off-a-job" target="_blank">Gawker&#8217;s take on the HuffPo lot at this link&#8230;<br />
</a></li>
<li>Interesting spot from the past: <a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/anya-kamenetz/the-high-cost-of-unpaid-i_b_21872.html" target="_blank">Anya Kamenetz writing at HuffPo in 2006 on &#8216;the high cost of unpaid internships&#8217;</a>:<br />
&#8220;Now you see businesses of all sizes taking on interns, openly for the free labor. I have been at &amp; heard of publications &amp; publishers where they save the slush pile all year for the summer interns to go through. And Gawker, which <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/gawker/help-wanted-gawker-media-seeks-slave-163422.php" target="_blank">doesn&#8217;t pay</a> its own <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/gawker/help-wanted-gawker-needs-a-new-slave-154973.php" target="_blank">interns</a>,  loves to post <a href="http://gawker.com/news/entertainment/matthew-barney-needs-slaves-014897.php" target="_blank">job</a> <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/jobs/do-a-fashion-editors-job-for-almost-no-money-161220.php" target="_blank">ads </a> wherein well-paid magazine editors, artists, and others seek full-time assistants for <a href="http://www.gawker.com/news/media/cosmogirl-wants-your-indentured-servitude-028925.php" target="_blank">free</a>.&#8221;</li>
</ul>
</blockquote>
<p>It reminds Journalism.co.uk of prizes offered in the the Independent&#8217;s annual charity auctions. In those, you bid to hang out with the Indy&#8217;s editors, correspondents and columnists (yes, people coughed up good money to hang out with the likes of Street-Porter, Emin and Kelner), and the lucky victors (a couple listed below) once got to spend a whole day at the office!</p>
<p><a href="http://license.icopyright.net/user/viewFreeUse.act?fuid=MzQ1ODQ5Mg%3D%3D" target="_blank">Mr Vogels was a lucky winner in 2003: </a></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lot 1: Hold the Front Page </strong><br />
Ever wondered how a daily newspaper gets put together? Come and see how it works from morning conference to the nail-biting deadline. Meet the staff and marvel at their cool professionalism, creative brilliance and unusual fashion sense.<br />
<strong>Winning bid: £1,750, Frederik Vogels, London.</strong></p></blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/politics/charity-auction-2005-518237.html" target="_blank">And Amar enjoyed a similar pleasure in 2005:</a><strong><br />
</strong></p>
<blockquote><p><strong>Lot 1: A Day at the Paper</strong> Ever wondered how a daily national newspaper gets put together? Come and see how it works for one exciting day, hearing the news agenda at morning conference, watching the tension build as the deadline hour approaches. Meet the glamorous staff and marvel at their camaraderie and coolness under pressure. <strong>Winning bid: amar, £2,251.11</strong>. (Last year&#8217;s winning   bid: £1,101)</p></blockquote>
<p>Any more examples? Add them below. <a href="http://gawker.com/5252905/huffpo-now-killing-journalism-by-literally-auctioning-off-a-job" target="_blank"><br />
</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/20/mediabistro-new-evening-newspaper-email-for-the-huffpo/" rel="bookmark" title="April 20, 2010">MediaBistro: New &#8216;evening newspaper&#8217; email for the HuffPo</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/08/03/life-as-an-editor-through-the-eyes-of-a-journalism-student/" rel="bookmark" title="August 3, 2010">Life as an editor &#8211; through the eyes of a journalism student</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/04/07/daily-finance-atlantic-media-announces-it-will-pay-all-interns/" rel="bookmark" title="April 7, 2010">Daily Finance: Atlantic Media announces it will pay all interns</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/10/poll-is-paul-dacre-right-to-criticise-justice-eadys-use-of-the-privacy-law/" rel="bookmark" title="November 10, 2008">Poll: Is Paul Dacre right to criticise Justice Eady&#8217;s use of the privacy law?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/08/20/youtube-success-for-deadline-press-picture-agency/" rel="bookmark" title="August 20, 2008">YouTube success for Deadline Press &#038; Picture Agency</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.747 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/14/15500-minimum-bid-for-huffpo-internship-a-chance-to-jumpstart-your-career-in-the-blogosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NYTimes.com: Life after &#8216;snarky&#8217; &#8211; the future for the gossip site writers</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/09/nytimescom-life-after-snarky-the-future-for-the-gossip-site-writers/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/09/nytimescom-life-after-snarky-the-future-for-the-gossip-site-writers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Mar 2009 09:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[defamer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gawker media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[movieline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NYTimes.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stephanie Clifford]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=8769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet Defamer is being absorbed into Gawker, but what&#8217;s happenning to its writers? The NYTimes takes a quick look at the reopening MovieLine website, the new home of Defamer&#8217;s editors and writers. &#8220;Whenever it is time to leave those [gossip] sites, though, the mocking writers often seem to have a change of heart as they [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/09/nytimescom-life-after-snarky-the-future-for-the-gossip-site-writers/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="NYTimes.com: Life after &#8216;snarky&#8217; &#8211; the future for the gossip site writers">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Defamer is being absorbed into Gawker, but what&#8217;s happenning to its writers?</p>
<p>The NYTimes takes a quick look at the reopening MovieLine website, the new home of Defamer&#8217;s editors and writers.</p>
<p>&#8220;Whenever it is time to leave those [gossip] sites, though, the mocking writers often seem to have a change of heart as they try to change their jobs,&#8221; Stephanie Clifford comments.</p>
<p>&#8220;The editor and writers at Defamer, the Gawker Media site, have taken a similar turn.&#8221;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/03/09/business/media/09movieline.html?partner=rss&amp;emc=rss" target="_blank">Full story at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/02/23/defamergawkercom-defamer-folds-into-gawker/" rel="bookmark" title="February 23, 2009">Defamer.gawker.com: Defamer &#8216;folds into&#8217; Gawker</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/04/27/nytimes-prweeks-move-monthly-its-keeping-the-name/" rel="bookmark" title="April 27, 2009">NYTimes: PRWeek&#8217;s move monthly (it&#8217;s keeping the name)</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/01/02/gawker-to-pay-bloggers-based-on-page-views-they-generate/" rel="bookmark" title="January 2, 2008">Gawker to pay bloggers based on page views they generate</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/mediabistro-new-gawker-tv-powered-by-interns-hopes-site-will-sell-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="November 5, 2009">Mediabistro: New Gawker.TV powered by interns; hopes site will sell ads</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/06/08/wordpress-rolls-out-twitter-and-facebook-comments-options/" rel="bookmark" title="June 8, 2011">WordPress rolls out Twitter and Facebook comments options</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.673 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/03/09/nytimescom-life-after-snarky-the-future-for-the-gossip-site-writers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Seeking Alpha: the end of micropublishing in the blogosphere?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/14/seeking-alpha-the-end-of-micropublishing-in-the-blogosphere/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/14/seeking-alpha-the-end-of-micropublishing-in-the-blogosphere/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Nov 2008 10:40:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Felix Salmon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Seeking Alpha]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[valleywag]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://seekingalpha.com/article/105920-blogonomics-is-it-the-end-of-micropublishing?source=feed</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Nick Denton's decision to merge gossip website Valleywag with Gawker marks the end of the micropublishing business model, according to Felix Salmon.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/14/seeking-alpha-the-end-of-micropublishing-in-the-blogosphere/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Seeking Alpha: the end of micropublishing in the blogosphere?">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Nick Denton&#8217;s decision to merge gossip website Valleywag with Gawker marks the end of the micropublishing business model, according to Felix Salmon.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/02/27/fishbowl-ny-sacked-gawker-editor-says-dentons-role-is-a-conflict-of-interest/" rel="bookmark" title="February 27, 2008">Fishbowl NY: Sacked Gawker editor says Denton&#8217;s role is a conflict of interest</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/01/02/gawker-to-pay-bloggers-based-on-page-views-they-generate/" rel="bookmark" title="January 2, 2008">Gawker to pay bloggers based on page views they generate</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/29/vanityfair-com-business-insiders-henry-blodget-vs-reuters-felix-salmon/" rel="bookmark" title="March 29, 2010">Vanityfair.com: Business Insider&#8217;s Henry Blodget vs Reuters&#8217; Felix Salmon</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/08/04/felix-salmon-gawker-sums-show-why-its-a-highly-profitable-media-co/" rel="bookmark" title="August 4, 2009">Felix Salmon: Gawker sums show why it&#8217;s a &#8216;highly profitable media co.&#8217;</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/mediabistro-new-gawker-tv-powered-by-interns-hopes-site-will-sell-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="November 5, 2009">Mediabistro: New Gawker.TV powered by interns; hopes site will sell ads</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.611 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/11/14/seeking-alpha-the-end-of-micropublishing-in-the-blogosphere/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Gawker alleges computer cut-backs for WSJ.com staff</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Oct 2008 15:48:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office-based editor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Olympics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reporter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology allowance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the States Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[WSJ.com]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=3439</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Tweet So Boris might give out Blackberries (well, &#8216;blackberry-type gizmos&#8217;) to Olympics spectators in 2012, but over in the States Wall Street Journal journalists are finding that their technology allowance is being cut back. Or so this &#8216;internal memo&#8217; on Gawker.com would have us believe. Is it for real? Apparently, all WSJ news staff have [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="Gawker alleges computer cut-backs for WSJ.com staff">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>So <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/uk/2008/oct/07/olympics2012.boris" target="_blank">Boris might give out Blackberries</a> (well, &#8216;blackberry-type gizmos&#8217;) to Olympics spectators in 2012, but over in the States Wall Street Journal journalists are finding that their technology allowance is being cut back.</p>
<p>Or so <a href="http://gawker.com/5060443/wsj-reporters-forced-to-lug-laptops" target="_blank">this &#8216;internal memo&#8217; on Gawker.com</a> would have us believe. Is it for real? Apparently, all WSJ news staff have been told that a new money-saving measure is in place: &#8216;at its core is the concept of &#8220;one person/one machine.&#8217;</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;If you are an office-based editor, you&#8217;ll get a new desktop. If you are a reporter or editor who travels on assignment, you&#8217;ll get a new laptop with a docking station, keyboard and monitor for office use.&#8221;</p></blockquote>
<p>That&#8217;s what the alleged internal memo reads. Comments below the Gawker article are sceptical: surely the typos in the memo are a bigger story than the computer cuts, writes &#8216;drunkexpatworker&#8217;.</p>
<p>Hmmm. Authentic or not? It seems an odd kind of prank if not: it wasn&#8217;t that funny.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/01/19/overheard-something-humorous-in-your-newsroom/" rel="bookmark" title="January 19, 2009">Overheard something humorous in your newsroom?</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/06/17/video-evidence-of-more-media-restrictions-on-bp-oil-spill-beaches/" rel="bookmark" title="June 17, 2010">Video: Evidence of more media restrictions on BP oil spill beaches</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/27/nieman-journalism-lab-nytimes-appoints-jennifer-preston-as-social-media-editor/" rel="bookmark" title="May 27, 2009">Nieman Journalism Lab: NYTimes appoints Jennifer Preston as social media editor</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/05/a-short-film-on-photo-assignments/" rel="bookmark" title="October 5, 2009">A short film on photo assignments</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/07/31/tip-of-the-day-from-journalismcouk-preventing-back-strain-at-work/" rel="bookmark" title="July 31, 2008">Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; preventing back strain at work</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 5.673 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/08/gawker-alleges-computer-cut-backs-for-wsjcom-staff/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>MediaBistro: Gawker lays off 19 members of editorial staff and cancels page view bonuses</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/06/mediabistro-gawker-lays-off-19-members-of-editorial-staff-and-cancels-page-view-bonuses/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/06/mediabistro-gawker-lays-off-19-members-of-editorial-staff-and-cancels-page-view-bonuses/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Oct 2008 11:02:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gawker.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Moe Tkacik]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nick Denton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[view bonuses Head]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.mediabistro.com/fishbowlny/news/gawker_lays_off_19_editorial_staff_including_moe_tkacik_96511.asp</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Head of Gawker.com, Nick Denton, announced on Friday that he was letting go 19 members of the editorial staff in a 'preemptive move', including Moe Tkacik, who was only just recently recruited. Page view bonuses for the first quarter of next year are to also to be cancelled in light of the 'upcoming fiscal crisis'. ]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[
<!-- This is the start of the WP Twitter Button code -->
<div id="rk_wp_twitter_button" style="margin: 0px 0px 10px 10px; float: right"><a href="http://twitter.com/share" class="twitter-share-button" data-url="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/06/mediabistro-gawker-lays-off-19-members-of-editorial-staff-and-cancels-page-view-bonuses/" data-count="vertical" data-via="journalismnews" data-text="MediaBistro: Gawker lays off 19 members of editorial staff and cancels page view bonuses">Tweet</a><script type="text/javascript" src="http://platform.twitter.com/widgets.js"></script></div>
<!-- This is the end of the WP Twitter Button code -->

<p>Head of Gawker.com, Nick Denton, announced on Friday that he was letting go 19 members of the editorial staff in a &#8216;preemptive move&#8217;, including Moe Tkacik, who was only recently recruited. Page view bonuses for the first quarter of next year are also to be cancelled in light of the &#8216;upcoming fiscal crisis&#8217;.</p>
<strong>Similar Posts:</strong><ul class="similar-posts"><li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/05/22/telegraphcouk-bbc-spends-175m-on-staff-bonuses/" rel="bookmark" title="May 22, 2009">Telegraph.co.uk: BBC spends £17.5m on staff bonuses</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/07/04/radar-gawker-cuts-staff-pay-rate-for-2nd-consecutive-quarter/" rel="bookmark" title="July 4, 2008">Radar: Gawker cuts staff pay rate for 2nd consecutive quarter</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/04/03/announcement-of-pay-cut-for-rusbridger-and-no-bonus-for-mccall-following-nuj-comments/" rel="bookmark" title="April 3, 2009">Announcement of pay cut for Rusbridger and no bonus for McCall following NUJ comments</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/02/27/fishbowl-ny-sacked-gawker-editor-says-dentons-role-is-a-conflict-of-interest/" rel="bookmark" title="February 27, 2008">Fishbowl NY: Sacked Gawker editor says Denton&#8217;s role is a conflict of interest</a></li>

<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/07/03/why-nick-denton-wouldnt-set-up-shop-in-uk/" rel="bookmark" title="July 3, 2009">Why Nick Denton wouldn&#8217;t set up shop in UK</a></li>
</ul><!-- Similar Posts took 38.437 ms -->]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2008/10/06/mediabistro-gawker-lays-off-19-members-of-editorial-staff-and-cancels-page-view-bonuses/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

