<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; Blog &#187; Times Online</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/tag/times-online/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>NMA: Times pay wall from next spring?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/11/nma-times-pay-wall-from-next-spring/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/11/nma-times-pay-wall-from-next-spring/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Nov 2009 13:38:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay walls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15806</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
NMA has more details on News International&#8217;s pay wall plans &#8211; Times Online is reportedly set to introduce the system in Q1 next year, while dates for The Sun and News of the World are undecided.
The Times website will also have a redesign next year as part of the changes.
&#8220;A source close to News International [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F11%2F11%2Fnma-times-pay-wall-from-next-spring%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F11%2F11%2Fnma-times-pay-wall-from-next-spring%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>NMA has more details on News International&#8217;s pay wall plans &#8211; Times Online is reportedly set to introduce the system in Q1 next year, while dates for The Sun and News of the World are undecided.</p>
<p>The Times website will also have a redesign next year as part of the changes.</p>
<p>&#8220;A source close to News International said because users will be charged to access the title, the site won&#8217;t focus on generating page impressions. It will be overhauled with a focus on a rich user experience, with content easier to find, and building greater user interaction. It&#8217;s also planning to run more live debates across the site, such as a recent discussion about the BNP,&#8221; writes NMA.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.nma.co.uk/times-to-charge-for-online-content-from-next-spring/3006442.article">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/06/18/shropshire-star-posts-59-rise-in-page-impressions/" rel="bookmark" title="June 18, 2008">Shropshire Star posts 59% rise in page impressions</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/01/ft-revamps-chinese-website-increases-video/" rel="bookmark" title="September 1, 2008">FT revamps Chinese website, increases video</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/06/npr-develop-content-management-tools-not-web-publishing-tools/" rel="bookmark" title="February 6, 2009">NPR: &#8216;Develop content management tools, not web publishing tools&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/04/28/innovations-in-journalism-a-plug-in-to-ease-sorting-through-web-images-and-video-from-piclens/" rel="bookmark" title="April 28, 2008">Innovations in Journalism &#8211; a plug in to ease sorting through web images and video from PicLens</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/08/19/cnet-relaunches-gamespot-website/" rel="bookmark" title="August 19, 2008">CNET relaunches GameSpot website</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.667 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/11/nma-times-pay-wall-from-next-spring/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Paying for podcasts? A Times Online poll</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/24/paying-for-podcasts-a-times-online-poll/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/24/paying-for-podcasts-a-times-online-poll/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 14:08:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay walls]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[podcasting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the bugle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12413</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Interesting poll currently running (well, at 2:54pm on July 24 at least) on Times Online asking if and how much listeners would be willing to pay to listen to its podcast The Bugle.

Of course this means nothing more than the podcast&#8217;s producer&#8217;s curiosity over whether its audience would be willing to pay. So far, 41 [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F07%2F24%2Fpaying-for-podcasts-a-times-online-poll%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F07%2F24%2Fpaying-for-podcasts-a-times-online-poll%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>Interesting poll currently running (<a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/us_and_americas/us_elections/the_bugle/" target="_blank">well, at 2:54pm on July 24 at least</a>) on Times Online asking if and how much listeners would be willing to pay to listen to its podcast The Bugle.<br />
<img class="size-full wp-image-12414 alignleft" title="Times Online podcast payment poll" src="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/timespoll.jpg" alt="Times Online podcast payment poll" width="286" height="380" /></p>
<p>Of course this means nothing more than the podcast&#8217;s producer&#8217;s curiosity over whether its audience would be willing to pay. So far, 41 per cent of respondents have suggested they would pay something; though 59 per cent say they wouldn&#8217;t cough up at all.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s also quite refreshing to see a newspaper site ask its users outright &#8211; whether this means there are any plans to charge or not.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=newsarchive&amp;sid=a_DxphTycoDM" target="_blank">According to a Bloomberg report</a> today, Jonathan Miller, chief digital officer with News Corp, whose News International arm owns the Times, has suggested the group could start charging for news and entertainment online.</p>
<p>Back in June, <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/03/mediaguardian-plans-for-paid-for-sunday-times-website/" target="_blank">MediaGuardian reports</a> suggested the Times&#8217; sister title, the Sunday Times, was considering setting up a paid-for standalone webiste.</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/05/07/ftcom-murdoch-considers-charging-for-online-news-developing-e-reader/" rel="bookmark" title="May 7, 2009">FT.com: Murdoch considers charging for online news, developing e-reader</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/10/round-up-charging-for-online-murdoch-and-the-ft/" rel="bookmark" title="August 10, 2009">Round-up: Charging for online &#8211; Murdoch and the FT</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/06/the-first-post-murdochs-radical-rethink-for-online-news-announces-3-4bn-loss/" rel="bookmark" title="August 6, 2009">The First Post: Murdoch&#8217;s &#8216;radical rethink&#8217; for online news; announces $3.4bn loss</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/09/how-the-news-sites-are-treating-the-phone-tapping-story/" rel="bookmark" title="July 9, 2009">How the news sites are treating the phone tapping story</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/17/allmediascotland-heraldtimes-editor-in-chief-ad-renews-merger-speculation/" rel="bookmark" title="September 17, 2008">Allmediascotland: Herald&#038;Times editor-in-chief ad renews merger speculation</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.554 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/24/paying-for-podcasts-a-times-online-poll/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Comment Central: New commenting system for Times Online</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/16/comment-central-new-commenting-system-for-times-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/16/comment-central-new-commenting-system-for-times-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Jul 2009 09:08:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[commenting]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[comments]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12152</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Times has introduced a new commenting system for its website lifting the upper word limit for comments from 300 to 2,000 and introducing a registration system.
&#8220;This will enable us to highlight and reward our best commenters, and weed out our least constructive,&#8221; writes online editor, Tom Whitwell &#8211; though no fixed reward system is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F07%2F16%2Fcomment-central-new-commenting-system-for-times-online%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F07%2F16%2Fcomment-central-new-commenting-system-for-times-online%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>The Times has introduced a new commenting system for its website lifting the upper word limit for comments from 300 to 2,000 and introducing a registration system.</p>
<p>&#8220;This will enable us to highlight and reward our best commenters, and weed out our least constructive,&#8221; writes online editor, Tom Whitwell &#8211; though no fixed reward system is mentioned, as yet.</p>
<p>Commenting systems differ between the paper&#8217;s blogs and the rest of its editorial content, but there are plans to switch the blogs over to the new platform.</p>
<p><a href="http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2009/07/our-shiny-new-comment-system-is-launched.html">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/" rel="bookmark" title="September 9, 2008">Guardian blogs complete move to new technology platform</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/08/20/guardian-relaunches-blogs-and-commenting-features/" rel="bookmark" title="August 20, 2008">Guardian relaunches blogs and commenting features</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/09/03/poynter-online-washington-posts-new-webcom-comment-system/" rel="bookmark" title="September 3, 2009">Poynter Online: Washington Post&#8217;s new &#8216;WebCom&#8217; comment system</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/08/online-journalism-scandinavia-norways-aftenposten-to-webcast-editorial-meetings/" rel="bookmark" title="July 8, 2008">Online Journalism Scandinavia: Norway&#8217;s Aftenposten to webcast editorial meetings</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/10/csm-and-cms-christian-science-monitor-readies-technology-for-web-only-move/" rel="bookmark" title="December 10, 2008">CSM and CMS: Christian Science Monitor readies technology for web-only move</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.657 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/16/comment-central-new-commenting-system-for-times-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>paidContent:UK: No plans for pay wall at Times Online</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/24/paidcontentuk-no-plans-for-pay-wall-at-times-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/24/paidcontentuk-no-plans-for-pay-wall-at-times-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:35:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[pay wall]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=8390</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
There are no plans to introduce a pay wall at Times Online &#8211; despite recent suggestions by newspaper rivals, paidContent:UK has learned.
Full story at this link&#8230;
Similar Posts:

NMA: Times pay wall from next spring?
paidContent:UK: News aggregator may take legal action against NLA copying levy
paidContent:UK: &#8216;Guardian may kill Tech print supplement&#8217;
Could the Monday MediaGuardian section go online-only?
No [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F02%2F24%2Fpaidcontentuk-no-plans-for-pay-wall-at-times-online%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F02%2F24%2Fpaidcontentuk-no-plans-for-pay-wall-at-times-online%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>There are no plans to introduce a pay wall at Times Online &#8211; despite recent suggestions by newspaper rivals, paidContent:UK has learned.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.paidcontent.co.uk/entry/419-pay-wall-renaissance/">Full story at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/11/nma-times-pay-wall-from-next-spring/" rel="bookmark" title="November 11, 2009">NMA: Times pay wall from next spring?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/29/paidcontentuk-news-aggregator-may-take-legal-action-against-nla-copying-levy/" rel="bookmark" title="June 29, 2009">paidContent:UK: News aggregator may take legal action against NLA copying levy</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/04/paidcontentuk-guardian-may-kill-tech-print-supplement/" rel="bookmark" title="June 4, 2009">paidContent:UK: &#8216;Guardian may kill Tech print supplement&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/09/could-the-monday-mediaguardian-section-go-online-only/" rel="bookmark" title="October 9, 2009">Could the Monday MediaGuardian section go online-only?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2007/11/26/no-integration-for-the-sun-and-the-news-of-the-world/" rel="bookmark" title="November 26, 2007">No integration for the Sun and the News Of The World</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.569 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/24/paidcontentuk-no-plans-for-pay-wall-at-times-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malcolm Coles: Times Online finds success with StumbleUpon</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/20/malcolm-coles-times-online-finds-success-with-stumbleupon/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/20/malcolm-coles-times-online-finds-success-with-stumbleupon/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:23:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[StumbleUpon]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=8290</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Some quick analysis over at Malcolm Coles&#8217; blog, suggests that Times Online is the most popular UK national newspaper when it comes to article-sharing/bookmarking on StumbleUpon.
Full post at this link&#8230;
Similar Posts:

Malcolm Coles&#8217; blog post results in changed T&#038;Cs on newspaper linking
Round-up: Charging for online &#8211; Murdoch and the FT
Producer responds to Guardian TV review: &#8216;If [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F02%2F20%2Fmalcolm-coles-times-online-finds-success-with-stumbleupon%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F02%2F20%2Fmalcolm-coles-times-online-finds-success-with-stumbleupon%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>Some quick analysis over at Malcolm Coles&#8217; blog, suggests that Times Online is the most popular UK national newspaper when it comes to article-sharing/bookmarking on StumbleUpon.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/times-top-of-newspaper-stumble-league/">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/13/malcolm-coles-blog-post-results-in-changed-tcs-on-newspaper-linking/" rel="bookmark" title="March 13, 2009">Malcolm Coles&#8217; blog post results in changed T&#038;Cs on newspaper linking</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/10/round-up-charging-for-online-murdoch-and-the-ft/" rel="bookmark" title="August 10, 2009">Round-up: Charging for online &#8211; Murdoch and the FT</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/30/producer-responds-to-guardian-tv-review-if-an-opera-is-reviewed-you-get-someone-who-knows-about-opera/" rel="bookmark" title="June 30, 2009">Producer responds to Guardian TV review: &#8216;If an opera is reviewed, you get someone who knows about opera&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/30/malcolm-coles-how-us-traffic-is-vital-for-uk-newspaper-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="July 30, 2009">Malcolm Coles: How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/15/social-bookmarking-and-uk-newspaper-websites/" rel="bookmark" title="December 15, 2008">Social bookmarking and UK newspaper websites</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.680 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/20/malcolm-coles-times-online-finds-success-with-stumbleupon/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Press Gazette: Wired UK names website team</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/21/press-gazette-wired-uk-names-website-team/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/21/press-gazette-wired-uk-names-website-team/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:03:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Jobs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Holden Frith]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Katie Scott]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[technology magazine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wired]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wired.co.uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=7071</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The UK edition of Conde Nast technology magazine Wired has named the editorial team for its website &#8211; set to launch in April to coincide with the print title.
Former online technology editor for Times Online, Holden Frith, takes up the reins as editor of Wired.co.uk; while the site&#8217;s news editor will be Katie Scott from [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F01%2F21%2Fpress-gazette-wired-uk-names-website-team%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F01%2F21%2Fpress-gazette-wired-uk-names-website-team%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>The UK edition of Conde Nast technology magazine Wired has named the editorial team for its website &#8211; set to launch in April to coincide with the print title.</p>
<p>Former online technology editor for Times Online, Holden Frith, takes up the reins as editor of Wired.co.uk; while the site&#8217;s news editor will be Katie Scott from Pocket-Lint.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=42863&amp;c=1">Full story at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/13/techcrunch-new-site-for-hearst-to-semi-automate-content/" rel="bookmark" title="October 13, 2009">TechCrunch: New site for Hearst to semi-automate content</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/03/update-internal-memo-says-observer-closure-actively-being-considered/" rel="bookmark" title="August 3, 2009">Update: Internal memo says Observer closure &#8216;actively being considered&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/02/12/journalismcouk-dennis-launches-new-digital-title-gizmo/" rel="bookmark" title="February 12, 2008">Journalism.co.uk: Dennis launches new digital title Gizmo</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/08/writing-a-feature-on-wire-live/" rel="bookmark" title="September 8, 2008">Writing a feature for Wired magazine &#8211; live</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/21/marc-reeves-on-why-hes-stepping-down-as-editor-at-the-birmingham-post/" rel="bookmark" title="October 21, 2009">Marc Reeves on why he&#8217;s stepping down as editor at the Birmingham Post</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.655 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/21/press-gazette-wired-uk-names-website-team/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Developers get bylines too in the Times</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/12/developers-get-bylines-too-in-the-times/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/12/developers-get-bylines-too-in-the-times/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 Nov 2008 17:14:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Multimedia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Barack Obama]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Julian Burgess]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Whitwell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5067</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Thanks to Tom Whitwell, assistant editor for Times Online, for bringing this to our attention: today&#8217;s print edition of the Times complete with joint byline for developer Julian Burgess.
The graphic printed was a visualisation of answers to a blog post on the Times&#8217; Comment Central, which asked readers what their biggest hope for President elect [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F11%2F12%2Fdevelopers-get-bylines-too-in-the-times%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F11%2F12%2Fdevelopers-get-bylines-too-in-the-times%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>Thanks to Tom Whitwell, assistant editor for Times Online, for bringing this to our attention: today&#8217;s print edition of the Times complete with joint byline for developer Julian Burgess.</p>
<p>The graphic printed was a visualisation of answers to <a href="http://timesonline.typepad.com/comment/2008/11/what-is-your-si.html" target="_blank">a blog post on the Times&#8217; Comment Central</a>, which asked readers what their biggest hope for President elect Barack Obama was.</p>
<p><a href="http://flickr.com/photos/71172892@N00/3024639616/"><img class="alignnone size-full wp-image-5070" title="Screenshot of The Times, courtesy of Tom Whitwell" src="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/wp-content/uploads/2008/11/3024639616_c64ac2d36e1.jpg" alt="" width="357" height="285" /></a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/06/election-day-newspapers-sold-on-ebay/" rel="bookmark" title="November 6, 2008">Election day newspapers sold on eBay</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/11/the-new-republic-why-journalists-should-benefit-from-obamas-new-deal/" rel="bookmark" title="December 11, 2008">The New Republic: Why journalists should benefit from Obama&#8217;s &#8216;New Deal&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/05/29/globe-and-mail-secret-service-personnel-remove-writer-brenda-lee-from-near-air-force-one/" rel="bookmark" title="May 29, 2009">Globe and Mail: Secret Service personnel remove writer Brenda Lee from near Air Force One</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/29/new-york-times-opens-visualization-lab-online/" rel="bookmark" title="October 29, 2008">New York Times opens &#8216;Visualization Lab&#8217; online</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/19/award-winning-american-political-website-launches-obameter/" rel="bookmark" title="January 19, 2009">Award-winning American political website launches &#8216;Obameter&#8217;</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.794 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/12/developers-get-bylines-too-in-the-times/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Times are changing: an online jobs shuffle at Times Online</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/07/times-are-changing-an-online-jobs-shuffle-at-timesonline/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/07/times-are-changing-an-online-jobs-shuffle-at-timesonline/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 14:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Spackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hector Arthur]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[James Harding]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tom Whitwell]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=3404</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
So, it&#8217;s all change at the Times and Times Online.
Anne Spackman, as reported last week, is now the comment editor of the main paper, after a spell as editor-in-chief at Times Online since 2006.
That role is not being replaced. Instead:

 Tom Whitwell, who is currently communities editor at Times Online, will be assistant editor of [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F10%2F07%2Ftimes-are-changing-an-online-jobs-shuffle-at-timesonline%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F10%2F07%2Ftimes-are-changing-an-online-jobs-shuffle-at-timesonline%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>So, it&#8217;s all change at the Times and <a href="http://www.timesonline.co.uk">Times Online</a>.</p>
<p>Anne Spackman, <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/oct/03/thetimes.pressandpublishing" target="_blank">as reported last week,</a> is now the comment editor of the main paper, after a spell as editor-in-chief at Times Online since 2006.</p>
<p>That role is not being replaced. Instead:</p>
<ul>
<li> Tom Whitwell, who is currently communities editor at Times Online, will be assistant editor of Times Online.</li>
</ul>
<ul>
<li>Hector Arthur, who was previously the head of content development for Times Online, is the new head of digital development for the website.</li>
</ul>
<p>Speaking in a press release, the Times&#8217; editor, James Harding said:  “Anne Spackman has done an extraordinary job at Times Online bringing our journalism to more people than at any time in our history.</p>
<p>&#8220;She has expanded the nature of what we do as a news organisation, introducing a 24/7 newsroom, launching The Times Archive and developing our podcasts, video and reader comments online&#8221;, he said.</p>
<p>Praising the new online assistant editor, Harding said that Tom Whitwell had &#8220;been one of the driving forces behind the phenomenal growth of Times journalism online and our audiences worldwide.”</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/07/followjourn-musicthingassistant-editor/" rel="bookmark" title="August 7, 2009">#FollowJourn: @musicthing/assistant editor</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/12/guardian-times-website-seeks-sky-news-link-up/" rel="bookmark" title="May 12, 2008">Guardian: Times website seeks Sky News link-up</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/23/times-online-inauguration-live-blog-attracts-35000/" rel="bookmark" title="January 23, 2009">Times Online inauguration live blog attracts 35,000</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/12/developers-get-bylines-too-in-the-times/" rel="bookmark" title="November 12, 2008">Developers get bylines too in the Times</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/06/26/times-editor-james-harding-on-the-daily-show/" rel="bookmark" title="June 26, 2008">Times editor James Harding on the Daily Show</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.855 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/07/times-are-changing-an-online-jobs-shuffle-at-timesonline/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How did the national newspaper online sites report the August ABCes?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/29/how-did-the-national-newspaper-online-sites-report-the-august-abces/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/29/how-did-the-national-newspaper-online-sites-report-the-august-abces/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Sep 2008 16:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Beijing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[FT.com]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Independent.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online newspaper]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online readers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online space]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=3222</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This post has backfired a little: the original idea was to look at how the national broadsheets reported the ABCes because it&#8217;s always interesting when a publication or website has to report on itself – on its good or bad performance.
Here&#8217;s how the Guardian did it today:
That obsession [Team GB] most obviously helped the Guardian, [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F09%2F29%2Fhow-did-the-national-newspaper-online-sites-report-the-august-abces%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F09%2F29%2Fhow-did-the-national-newspaper-online-sites-report-the-august-abces%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>This post has backfired a little: the original idea was to look at how the national broadsheets reported the ABCes because it&#8217;s always interesting when a publication or website has to report on itself – on its good or bad performance.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s how <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/sep/29/abcs.digital.media" target="_blank">the Guardian did it today</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>That obsession [Team GB] most obviously helped the Guardian, which took advantage of the Beijing effect. That meant that guardian.co.uk remained the UK&#8217;s biggest online newspaper for August, attracting 23.11 million global unique users last month, a 46% increase from August 2007 and up 12% on July this year. The Guardian added 2.5 million unique users last month and still has the largest number of UK-based online readers: 8.77 million or 38% of its total audience.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>And on the day itself <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/sep/25/abcs.digitalmedia" target="_blank">like this</a>.</p>
<p>And Telegraph.co.uk?</p>
<p>It looks like they didn&#8217;t.</p>
<p>Times Online?</p>
<p>It appears not.</p>
<p>Independent.co.uk?</p>
<p>Nope.</p>
<p>FT.com</p>
<p>No.</p>
<p>Please correct us if we&#8217;re wrong.</p>
<p>Looks like there was only one national newspaper who gave the August stats so much online space. But you could read about the ABCes at <a href="http://www.brandrepublic.com/Discipline/Digital/News/849139/Leading-news-sites-hoover-overseas-users-August-ABCes/" target="_blank">Brand Republic</a>, <a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=42111&amp;c=1" target="_blank">Press Gazette</a>, <a href="http://www.nma.co.uk/Articles/39779/Online+newspapers+see+jump+in+traffic+for+August.html" target="_blank">NMA</a> and here at <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/532408.php" target="_blank">Journalism.co.uk</a>. Or <a href="http://www.abce.org.uk/cgi-bin/gen5?runprog=abce/abce&amp;noc=y" target="_blank">find the data for yourself</a> here.</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/14/media-guardian-15m-uk-users-visted-newspaper-claims-comscore/" rel="bookmark" title="May 14, 2008">Media Guardian: 15m UK users visted newspaper, claims ComScore</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/how-the-guardian-and-telegraph-overtook-the-mail-in-latest-abce-traffic-report/" rel="bookmark" title="October 26, 2009">How the Guardian and Telegraph overtook the Mail in latest ABCe traffic report</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/28/twitter-tops-bbc-for-monthly-traffic-while-bbc-online-click-throughs-exceed-10m/" rel="bookmark" title="August 28, 2009">Twitter tops BBC for monthly traffic, while BBC Online click-throughs exceed 10m</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/10/weltde-posts-record-traffic-for-february/" rel="bookmark" title="March 10, 2008">Welt.de posts record traffic for February</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/30/malcolm-coles-how-us-traffic-is-vital-for-uk-newspaper-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="July 30, 2009">Malcolm Coles: How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.100 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/29/how-did-the-national-newspaper-online-sites-report-the-august-abces/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guardian: Times website seeks Sky News link-up</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/12/guardian-times-website-seeks-sky-news-link-up/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/12/guardian-times-website-seeks-sky-news-link-up/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 May 2008 10:04:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Luft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Anne Spackman]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MediaGuardian.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sky News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[times]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Times Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Video]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/12/guardian-times-website-seeks-sky-news-link-up/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
The Times website wants to carry more video content from Sky News.
Times Online editor-in-chief, Anne Spackman, told MediaGuardian.co.uk that negotiations to make this happen were at an early stage on the newspaper website carrying breaking news videos from Sky.
Any deal is likely to improve the online video offering from the Times.
Despite being one of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F05%2F12%2Fguardian-times-website-seeks-sky-news-link-up%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F05%2F12%2Fguardian-times-website-seeks-sky-news-link-up%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>The Times website wants to carry more video content from Sky News.</p>
<p>Times Online editor-in-chief, Anne Spackman, told MediaGuardian.co.uk that negotiations to make this happen were at an early stage on the newspaper website carrying breaking news videos from Sky.</p>
<p>Any deal is likely to improve the online video offering from the Times.</p>
<p>Despite being one of the first national newspapers to adopt a TV service the Times offering has fallen behind other nationals &#8211; in terms of quality &#8211; and seems to be due an overhaul.</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/24/new-york-times-expands-video-online/" rel="bookmark" title="October 24, 2008">New York Times expands video online</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/10/sky-ramps-up-ads-in-online-video/" rel="bookmark" title="July 10, 2008">Sky ramps up ads in online video</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/04/09/video-search-engine-blinkx-partners-guardian/" rel="bookmark" title="April 9, 2008">Video search engine Blinkx partners Guardian</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/02/globalpost-partners-with-cbs-offers-investigative-journalists-for-hire/" rel="bookmark" title="October 2, 2009">GlobalPost partners with CBS &#8211; offers investigative journalists for hire</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/18/media-release-bauer-radio-signs-syndication-deal-with-independent-co-uk/" rel="bookmark" title="August 18, 2009">Media Release: Bauer Radio signs syndication deal with Independent.co.uk</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.931 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/12/guardian-times-website-seeks-sky-news-link-up/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
