<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; Blog &#187; Simon Collister</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/tag/simon-collister/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Telegraph.co.uk inserting keywords to drive traffic?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/14/telegraphcouk-inserting-keywords-to-drive-traffic/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/14/telegraphcouk-inserting-keywords-to-drive-traffic/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Jul 2008 14:08:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[google]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Simon Collister]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Daily Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=1506</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Simon Collister has blogged about Telegraph.co.uk&#8217;s rising web traffic making it into this month&#8217;s Private Eye.
The Eye apparently writes:
&#8220;[Telegraph] news hacks are sent a memo three or four times a day from the website boffins listing the top subjects being searched in the last few hours on Google. They are then expected to write stories [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F07%2F14%2Ftelegraphcouk-inserting-keywords-to-drive-traffic%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F07%2F14%2Ftelegraphcouk-inserting-keywords-to-drive-traffic%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p><a href="http://simoncollister.typepad.com/simonsays/2008/07/telegraphs-web.html">Simon Collister has blogged about Telegraph.co.uk&#8217;s rising web traffic</a> making it into this month&#8217;s Private Eye.</p>
<p>The Eye apparently writes:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;[Telegraph] news hacks are sent a memo three or four times a day from the website boffins listing the top subjects being searched in the last few hours on Google. They are then expected to write stories accordingly and/or get as many of those key words into the first par of their story.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>(Shades of the England football team inserting song lyrics into post-match interviews under Glen Hoddle&#8230;)</p>
<p>As this appears in Private Eye the usual caveats apply, but similar practices at the Telegraph have been suggested by the <a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/mediamonkey/2008/07/media_diary_from_the_observer_7.html">Observer&#8217;s media diary</a>:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Daily Telegraph has been accused of inserting keywords into copy to ensure its website gets the maximum number of hits, so it was interesting to see the following comment on telegraph.co.uk, posted in response to a rather dry piece about civil liberties penned by advertising guru Maurice Saatchi. &#8216;Dear Mr Saatchi,&#8217; it began. &#8216;Your sister-in-law [ie Nigella Lawson] is second only to Holly Willoughby in my affections.&#8217; You may wonder what the photogenic TV star has to do with 42-day detention periods, but it can&#8217;t harm the traffic figures.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>Is the Eye onto something or is this just another <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/category/traffic/">Guardian-Telegraph conspiracy theory</a>?</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/08/14/newspaper-society-belfast-telegraph-sees-traffic-surge-after-online-revamp/" rel="bookmark" title="August 14, 2008">Newspaper Society: Belfast Telegraph sees traffic surge after online revamp</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/10/nuj-release-video-showing-police-treatment-of-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="September 10, 2008">NUJ release video showing police treatment of journalists</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2007/11/06/soe-guardian-reporter-planning-to-use-hitwise-figures-in-telegraph-marketing-again/" rel="bookmark" title="November 6, 2007">@SoE: Guardian reporter: planning to use Hitwise figures in Telegraph marketing again?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/11/ny-gov-spitzer-prostitution-ring-story-crashes-nyt-website/" rel="bookmark" title="March 11, 2008">NY Gov. Spitzer prostitution ring story crashes NYT website</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/23/undercover-soldier-why-didnt-the-beeb-open-up-the-debate-online/" rel="bookmark" title="September 23, 2008">Undercover Soldier: why didn&#8217;t the Beeb open up the debate online?</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.851 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/14/telegraphcouk-inserting-keywords-to-drive-traffic/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
