<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; Blog &#187; printing
press</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/tag/printingpress/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>End print edition of New York Times, argues Netscape co-founder</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/30/end-print-edition-of-new-york-times-argues-netscape-co-founder/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/30/end-print-edition-of-new-york-times-argues-netscape-co-founder/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 15:56:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christian Science Monitor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Internet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Marc Andreessen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ning]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[printing
press]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the New York Times]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=4165</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
In Marc Andreessen&#8217;s world the Christian Science Monitor wouldn&#8217;t be the only traditional print product going online-only.
In this interview in the latest edition of Portfolio, Andreessen, who is co-founder of Ning, Netscape and investor in Digg and Twitter, says the New York Times should cut its print losses and focus on &#8216;the market of the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F10%2F30%2Fend-print-edition-of-new-york-times-argues-netscape-co-founder%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F10%2F30%2Fend-print-edition-of-new-york-times-argues-netscape-co-founder%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>In Marc Andreessen&#8217;s world <a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5iMzaEVI72idTWsroD4wq-wEhVSuwD943MOH80" target="_blank">the Christian Science Monitor wouldn&#8217;t be the only traditional print product going online-only</a>.</p>
<p>In <a href="http://www.portfolio.com/executives/features/2008/10/15/Marc-Andreessen-Q-and-A#page2" target="_blank">this interview in the latest edition of Portfolio</a>, Andreessen, who is co-founder of Ning, Netscape and investor in Digg and Twitter, says the New York Times should cut its print losses and focus on &#8216;the market of the future&#8217;.</p>
<blockquote><p><strong>If you were running the <em>New York Times,</em> what would you do?</strong><br />
[Andreessen] Shut off the print edition right now. You&#8217;ve got to play offence. You&#8217;ve got to do what Intel did in &#8216;85 when it was getting killed by the Japanese in memory chips, which was its dominant business. And it famously killed the business &#8211; shut it off and focused on its much smaller business, microprocessors, because that was going to be the market of the future. And the minute Intel got out of playing defence and into playing offence, its future was secure. The newspaper companies have to do exactly the same thing.</p>
<p>The financial markets have discounted forward to the terminal conclusion for newspapers, which is basically bankruptcy. So at this point, if you&#8217;re one of these major newspapers and you shut off the printing press, your stock price would probably go up, despite the fact that you would lose 90 per cent of your revenue. Then you play offence. And guess what? You&#8217;re an internet company.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/09/09/british-journalist-rescued-from-taliban-but-interpreter-died-reports-suggest-british-soldier-also-killed/" rel="bookmark" title="September 9, 2009">British journalist rescued from Taliban but interpreter died; reports suggest British soldier also killed</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2007/12/11/new-york-times-after-reuters-business-news-too/" rel="bookmark" title="December 11, 2007">New York Times after Reuters business news too?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/08/forbescom-ihtcom-will-become-part-of-the-new-york-times-site/" rel="bookmark" title="October 8, 2008">Forbes.com: IHT.com will become part of the New York Times site</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/03/nytimescom-exec-editor-takes-nytimes-reader-questions/" rel="bookmark" title="February 3, 2009">NYTimes.com: Exec editor takes NYTimes reader questions</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/paidcontentuk-round-up-of-sly-bailey-comments-at-digital-britain-summit/" rel="bookmark" title="April 20, 2009">paidContent:UK: Round-up of Sly Bailey comments at Digital Britain summit</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.619 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/30/end-print-edition-of-new-york-times-argues-netscape-co-founder/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
