<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; Blog &#187; online traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/tag/online-traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Australian: Australian print media to release web traffic audits by end of year</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/08/28/the-australian-australian-print-media-to-release-web-traffic-audits-by-end-of-year/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/08/28/the-australian-australian-print-media-to-release-web-traffic-audits-by-end-of-year/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 Aug 2008 16:53:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Magazines]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Australia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[International]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online traffic]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.theaustralian.news.com.au/story/0,25197,24195856-13480,00.html</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Audited data for online traffic to Australia's newspapers and magazines will be produced by the end of the year.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[Audited data for online traffic to Australia's newspapers and magazines will be produced by the end of the year.]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/08/28/the-australian-australian-print-media-to-release-web-traffic-audits-by-end-of-year/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Guardian publishes string of anti-Telegraph stories &#8211; cue spat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/28/guardian-publishes-string-of-anti-telegraph-stories-cue-spat/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/28/guardian-publishes-string-of-anti-telegraph-stories-cue-spat/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 17:03:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BNP]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[community media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Guardian.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[internal measurement tools]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Seaton]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online communities]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online traffic measurement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Richard Barnbrook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shane Richmond]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph Media Group]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Telegraph.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[the Telegraph]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web advances]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/28/guardian-publishes-string-of-anti-telegraph-stories-cue-spat/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
While the Daily Mail allegedly has a gentlemen&#8217;s agreement with the Telegraph not to write about each other&#8217;s parent company, it hardly seems worth pointing out that no such pact exists between the Guardian and the Telegraph online.
Over the last month a series of articles published by Guardian.co.uk has alleged various problems with or criticised [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F05%2F28%2Fguardian-publishes-string-of-anti-telegraph-stories-cue-spat%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F05%2F28%2Fguardian-publishes-string-of-anti-telegraph-stories-cue-spat%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>While <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/jan/24/dailytelegraph.sundaytelegraph">the Daily Mail allegedly has a gentlemen&#8217;s agreement with the Telegraph</a> not to write about each other&#8217;s parent company, it hardly seems worth pointing out that no such pact exists between the <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk">Guardian</a> and the <a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk">Telegraph online</a>.</p>
<p>Over the last month a series of articles published by Guardian.co.uk has alleged various problems with or criticised Telegraph.co.uk.</p>
<p>The latest <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2008/may/28/thefarright.media">links the MyTelegraph section with the BNP</a> for a second time in little over a week, detailing <a href="http://my.telegraph.co.uk/cllr_richard_barnbrook/may_2008/blame_the_immigrants.htm">a blog post on the platform by BNP member Richard Barnbrook</a> entitled &#8216;Blame the immigrants&#8217;.</p>
<p>The Guardian first made the connection between the party and <a href="http://my.telegraph.co.uk">MyTelegraph</a> with an <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/19/pressandpublishing.telegraphmediagroup">article looking into managing online communities</a> that discussed MyT under the provocative headline &#8216;Platform for free speech &#8230; or hate?&#8217; and went on to say one user &#8216;publishes BNP campaign literature and flyers&#8217; on the site.</p>
<p>On both occasions the Telegraph emphasised the free speech ethos behind MyT, which is policed by readers who are relied upon to report offensive material.</p>
<p>The policy seems to be working &#8211; Barnbrook&#8217;s post has attracted over 30 comments including several from the hang &#8216;um and flog &#8216;um brigade alongside more measured <a href="http://my.telegraph.co.uk/__users/21290/">anti-BNP responses</a>.</p>
<p>MyTelegraph&#8217;s problems at the end of last year, as the technology firm behind its development went into administration, were also documented recently by the Guardian:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Telegraph Media Group&#8217;s community media site MyTelegraph &#8216;is on life support&#8217; until it receives an overhaul this summer, the company&#8217;s communities editor said today.</p>
<p>&#8220;Shane Richmond told the PPA Magazines 2008 conference that the site had suffered periodic downtime, slow page-loads and instability since the company which built it, Interesource, went in to administration late last year.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>I was there, he did say that, but then again <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/jan08/patient_recovering.htm">he&#8217;d already blogged about it months before</a>.</p>
<p>But then again, again. He DID say it, so it&#8217;s fair to report him saying it.</p>
<p>In addition to this last month&#8217;s ABCe figures showing that <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/531631.php">the Telegraph site passed the Guardian for the first time to become the UK&#8217;s most popular newspaper</a> website in terms of unique users, seem only to have fanned the competitive fire.</p>
<p>The Guardian was the first to delve into the Telegraph&#8217;s recent rapid growth in unique users &#8211; from 12,283,835 in February to 17,036,081 in March, and 18,646,112 in April &#8211; suggesting <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/apr/29/dailytelegraph.digitalmedia">a switch in internal measurement tools may have prompted the surge</a>.</p>
<p>Continuing the series of pieces on the Telegraph&#8217;s online traffic &#8211; and there are a few of them now &#8211; the Guardian suggests that a <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/531632.php">review of online traffic measurement announced by JICWEBS</a> last week was sparked by <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/23/telegraphmediagroup.abcs">publishers concerns over the Telegraph&#8217;s recent growth</a>.</p>
<p>All fair news pieces from the Guardian? Surely there can be no complaint with their reporting factual news? Well, yes there can.</p>
<p>After the publication of the latest Guardian piece today, Telegraph communities editor Shane Richmond came out fighting, <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/may08/comment-is-free-perhaps-too-free.htm">accusing the Guardian of hypocrisy</a> and arguing that if the charge leveled at the Telegraph is one of giving a platform to racists and fanatics then it is a charge that could well be applied to the Guardian&#8217;s Comment is Free blog.</p>
<p>&#8220;How about <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/may08/guardian-concerned-about-my-telegraph.htm" title="Link to previous post (opens new browser window)">we take the view</a> that when you have an open platform, whether it&#8217;s My Telegraph, Comment Is Free, or the internet itself, then you have to accept that a multiplicity of views will be expressed on it and that some of those views will be unpalatable to some people,&#8221; he <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/may08/comment-is-free-perhaps-too-free.htm">wrote</a>.</p>
<p>&#8220;If the Guardian&#8217;s attacks on our site are motivated by genuine concern, then they should look closer to home first. However, I suspect that this sustained criticism has more to do with <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2008/may/22/abcs.telegraphmediagroup" title="Link to Media Guardian (opens new browser window)">sour grapes</a> over <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/may08/telegraph-overtakes-guardian.htm" title="Link to previous post (opens new browser window)">recent audience trends</a>.&#8221;</p>
<p>Stories about other publishers are fair game and healthy competition between the titles is to be encouraged.</p>
<p>But take the BNP stories and the numerous stories about the Telegraph&#8217;s web advances en masse and one may begin to wonder when healthy news reporting begins to border on the obsessive?</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE</strong> &#8211; the &#8216;debate&#8217; continues with <a href="http://blogs.telegraph.co.uk/technology/shanerichmond/may08/that-comment-is-free-argument-again.htm">a post from Shane Richmond</a> in response to a comment left by Comment is Free editor Matt Seaton on his Telegraph.co.uk blog</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/19/guardian-review-of-mytelegraph-is-out-of-touch-with-internet-age/" rel="bookmark" title="May 19, 2008">Guardian review of MyTelegraph is &#8216;out of touch with internet age&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/17/mps-expenses-data-will-be-officially-released-thursday-but-how-much-will-be-edited-out/" rel="bookmark" title="June 17, 2009">MPs&#8217; expenses data will be officially released Thursday but how much will be edited out?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2007/11/08/new-telegraph-political-blogs-on-the-way/" rel="bookmark" title="November 8, 2007">New Telegraph political blog on the way</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/06/09/guardian-implements-pluck-on-comment-is-free-platform/" rel="bookmark" title="June 9, 2008">Guardian implements Pluck on Comment Is Free platform</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2007/10/23/guardian-america/" rel="bookmark" title="October 23, 2007">Guardian America</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.317 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/28/guardian-publishes-string-of-anti-telegraph-stories-cue-spat/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Online Journalism Scandinavia: Norway&#8217;s leading news sites strategies for attracting online audience</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/10/online-journalism-scandinavia-norways-leading-news-sites-strategies-for-attracting-online-audience/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/10/online-journalism-scandinavia-norways-leading-news-sites-strategies-for-attracting-online-audience/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 10 Mar 2008 13:07:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Kristine Lowe</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bjarne Andre Myklebust]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Digital video]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Eirik Solheim]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Europe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Facebook]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kristine Lowe]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mark Comerford]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media developer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[media industry]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Norway]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[NRK]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online audience]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online division]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism Scandinavia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online team]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[public broadcaster]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[read news site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social media]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social network]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Spain]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sweden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Torry Pedersen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United Kingdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[United States]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[VG]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[week 
Online Journalism Scandinavia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[YouTube]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/10/online-journalism-scandinavia-norways-leading-news-sites-strategies-for-attracting-online-audience/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Kristine Lowe is a freelance journalist who writes on the media industry for number of US, UK and Norwegian publications. This week Online Journalism Scandinavia looks at how Norway&#8217;s leading news sites attract their audiences.

Schibsted-owned VG&#8217;s recipe for success is to give people the diet they had no idea they craved
Norway&#8217;s public broadcaster, NRK, wants [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F03%2F10%2Fonline-journalism-scandinavia-norways-leading-news-sites-strategies-for-attracting-online-audience%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F03%2F10%2Fonline-journalism-scandinavia-norways-leading-news-sites-strategies-for-attracting-online-audience%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/kristine1.jpg" title="Image of Kristine Lowe"><img src="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/wp-content/uploads/2008/02/kristine1.jpg" alt="Image of Kristine Lowe" /></a><em><a href="http://kristinelowe.blogs.com/">Kristine Lowe</a> is a freelance journalist who writes on the media industry for number of US, UK and Norwegian publications. This week <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/category/online-journalism-scandinavia/">Online Journalism Scandinavia</a> looks at how Norway&#8217;s leading news sites attract their audiences.</em><span id="more-48"></span></p>
<ul>
<li>Schibsted-owned VG&#8217;s recipe for success is to give people the diet they had no idea they craved</li>
<li>Norway&#8217;s public broadcaster, NRK, wants to make it easier for lazy users to take shortcuts</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Frozen pizza with champagne</strong><br />
<a href="http://www.schibsted.com/">Schibsted&#8217;s</a> idiosyncratic take on newspaper website design recently received mention in this excellent article by the <a href="http://www.pressgazette.co.uk/story.asp?sectioncode=1&amp;storycode=40271">Press Gazette</a> (also check out <a href="http://markmedia.blogs.com/markmedia/2008/02/design-good-bad.html">Mark Comerford&#8217;s</a> and <a href="http://www.espen.com/archives/2008/02/clunky_does_it.html">Espen Andersen&#8217;s</a> thoughts).</p>
<p>However, its <a href="http://www.vg.no/">VG</a> title is perhaps in a class of its own. It’s Norway&#8217;s most read news site with 2.7m unique users and a staggering profit margin of 42 &#8211; 45 per cent for the last three years. So the way it structures content is just as, if not more, important and also needs emphasis.</p>
<p>&#8220;VG has the world&#8217;s ugliest website, but the great thing about it is that it lets you discover things you did not know you were interested in. Other news sites divide their content in neatly defined sections, but we believe that people will drink champagne with frozen pizza if given the choice,&#8221;said Torry Pedersen, editor-in-chief of VG online.</p>
<p>“That, if given the choice on the same page, people will want to read both a well argued piece on file-sharing and a story on Britney Spears&#8217; latest escapades.&#8221;</p>
<p>To get even more readers to its content VG has also developed Norway&#8217;s second biggest social network, <a href="http://www.nettby.no/">Nettby</a>, with 657,000 members. It&#8217;s roughly half the size of <a href="http://jilltxt.net/?p=2213">Facebook in Norway</a> and Schibsted is already in the process of exporting it to its operations in Sweden and Spain.</p>
<p><strong>The world&#8217;s laziest anarchy</strong><br />
Despite VG&#8217;s dominance, public broadcaster <a href="http://www.nrk.no/">NRK</a> has almost doubled its online traffic in the last year with a 42 per cent increase in unique users &#8211; from 651,000 in the first week of 2007, to 1.1m in the fist week of 2008.</p>
<p>(Traffic numbers for both sites from <a href="http://www.tns-gallup.no/default.aspx?did=9075748&amp;ugeselect=200801">TNS Gallup</a>, which only counts traffic generated by Norway&#8217;s 4.7m citizens)</p>
<p>Part of this traffic rise can be attributed to the NRK take on how to best alert people to content they might find interesting.</p>
<p>&#8220;The web is the world&#8217;s laziest anarchy: people choose the least difficult path. With this in mind, we are working to be present where people are and give them the opportunity to discover us there, which means on Facebook, YouTube and other such places,&#8221; said Eirik Solheim, a  media developer with NRK&#8217;s online team.</p>
<p>&#8220;There are three ways to deal with what is happening with social media. You choose not to be present; you choose to make your own services that can compete with Facebook, as VG has been successful with; or you choose to be present where people are to increase familiarity with your brand and strengthen distribution. We see the last option as a great opportunity,&#8221; said Bjarne Andre Myklebust, head of NRK&#8217;s online division.</p>
<p><strong>Two takes on serendipity</strong><br />
Both news groups&#8217; strategies play to the serendipitous nature of the web, but while VG&#8217;s approach is designed to keep readers hooked by satisfying old and newfound appetites on its site, NRK wants to increase your chances of accidentally stumbling across its content.</p>
<p>No doubt, NRK wants those accidental users to linger. So if it keeps its promise to open up more of its archives and make more and more of its content freely and easily available in the places &#8211; beyond its own websites &#8211; where people hang out online, it will be interesting to see which is the more successful strategy.</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/26/online-journalism-scandinavia-print-and-online-integration-not-the-key-to-success/" rel="bookmark" title="March 26, 2008">Online Journalism Scandinavia: Print and online integration &#8216;not the key to success&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/30/outlook2010-lepost-fr-horizontal-not-vertical-news/" rel="bookmark" title="October 30, 2009">#Outlook2010: LePost.fr &#8211; horizontal, not vertical, news</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/02/greenslade-mirror-co-uk-on-metrics-and-building-loyal-online-audiences/" rel="bookmark" title="October 2, 2009">Greenslade: Mirror.co.uk on metrics and building loyal online audiences</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/06/10/online-journalism-scandinavia-how-to-kiss-713-000-teenagers-and-still-make-a-profit/" rel="bookmark" title="June 10, 2008">Online Journalism Scandinavia: How to kiss 713,000 teenagers and still make a profit</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/27/notws-reporting-on-max-mosley-was-out-of-context-and-unethical-says-undercover-reporter/" rel="bookmark" title="October 27, 2008">NOTW&#8217;s reporting on Max Mosley was out of context and unethical, says undercover reporter</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.229 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/10/online-journalism-scandinavia-norways-leading-news-sites-strategies-for-attracting-online-audience/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Editor and Publisher: Newsday traffic ahead of WSJ.com</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/17/editor-and-publisher-newsday-traffic-ahead-of-wsjcom/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/17/editor-and-publisher-newsday-traffic-ahead-of-wsjcom/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 07:25:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Oliver Luft</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[online traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[The Wall Street Journal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[USA]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/17/editor-and-publisher-newsday-traffic-ahead-of-wsjcom/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8216;Newsday&#8217;s online traffic edged past The Wall Street Journal Online in the month of December, according to the latest data from Nielsen Online.&#8217;
Similar Posts:

Allthingsdigital: Huff Post edges past Drudge for traffic
Has ditching print edition damaged Post-Intelligencer&#8217;s web traffic?
Online media consumption up by seven per cent, as a result of financial strife
TheDailyBeast: Ex-WSJ assistant publisher on [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F01%2F17%2Feditor-and-publisher-newsday-traffic-ahead-of-wsjcom%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2008%2F01%2F17%2Feditor-and-publisher-newsday-traffic-ahead-of-wsjcom%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>&#8216;Newsday&#8217;s online traffic edged past The Wall Street Journal Online in the month of December, according to the latest data from Nielsen Online.&#8217;</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/25/allthingsdigital-huff-post-edges-past-drudge-for-traffic/" rel="bookmark" title="March 25, 2008">Allthingsdigital: Huff Post edges past Drudge for traffic</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/22/has-ditching-print-edition-damaged-post-intelligencers-web-traffic/" rel="bookmark" title="April 22, 2009">Has ditching print edition damaged Post-Intelligencer&#8217;s web traffic?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/07/online-media-consumption-up-by-seven-per-cent-as-a-result-of-financial-strife/" rel="bookmark" title="October 7, 2008">Online media consumption up by seven per cent, as a result of financial strife</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/06/thedailybeast-ex-wsj-assistant-publisher-on-paid-online-content-myths-and-facts/" rel="bookmark" title="March 6, 2009">TheDailyBeast: Ex-WSJ assistant publisher on paid online content &#8211; myths and facts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/12/editorsweblog-emerging-nations-favour-mobile-internet-access/" rel="bookmark" title="December 12, 2008">EditorsWeblog: Emerging nations favour mobile internet access</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 10.116 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/17/editor-and-publisher-newsday-traffic-ahead-of-wsjcom/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
