CounterValue: FT’s Newsroom 2009 and why CMS tech is holding publishers back

Great post from Telegraph assistant editor Justin Williams on changes to production under the Financial Times’ Newsroom 2009 project and the Tele’s own trials with new sub-editing processes.

But, says Williams:

“What has and continues to hold this up is the technology. Editorial CMS suppliers continue to market products that, although making the process of web publishing easier and faster, still rely upon the buyers maintaining large production departments to manage the print pages.”

Spelling, grammar, style checks, page construction and more should be automated, he argues.

Full post at this link…

Similar posts:

• TechCrunch: New site for Hearst to semi-automate content
• CounterValue: Why Burnham and the Beeb won’t save the local press
• Washington Post: Fewer copy editors, more errors – now a ‘universal desk’
• Guardian appoints roles in new editorial ‘pods’
• Nonprofit journalism: Survey suggests ‘dramatic drop’ in local newspaper content

CounterValue: Sun buys Natasha Richardson as sponsored link

Spotted by Justin Williams – The Sun has purchased ‘Natasha Richardson’ as Google keywords, following the death of the actress.

As raised when the Guardian mistakenly bought the search terms ‘Madeleine McCann’, how much is too much when it comes to search engine marketing?

Full post at this link…

Similar posts:

• Guardian was wrong to buy Madeleine McCann keywords on Google
• Liverpool Daily Post: Madeleine McCann keywords in every main local news story was ‘oversight’
• OJR: Using Google Trends to fine-tune your news website
• CounterValue: Why Burnham and the Beeb won’t save the local press
• CounterValue: Online news industry must end obsession with unique users

Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – local media maps

Similar posts:

• #Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – Use happn.in to find out local Twitter trends
• Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – trawl Facebook groups for local news
• #Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – local Twitter search
• #Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – ideas for original radio journalism
• Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – think ahead with PlanningAlerts.com

Justin Williams: The UK’s independent local news sites mapped

Courtesy of Justin Williams, assistant editor at the Daily Telegraph, comes this map of independent news websites in the UK:

The featured sites present a snapshot of how the definition of local news and news providers is changing with dedicated ‘news’ sites mapped alongside village information websites and campaign groups.

Justin is still looking for more examples – if you’ve got one/run one, contact him via his blog or on Twitter

Similar posts:

• Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – local media maps
• The news as niche
• Scottish newspapers claw back advertising from council jobs site
• Birmingham Mail looking at developing community-based sites
• Sports section revamp for Northcliffe – building a sporting community

CounterValue: Online news industry must end obsession with unique users

“Google News and our response to it as an industry are seriously distorting our web-based publishing models,” writes the Daily Telegraph’s Justin Williams.

Resources may be poured into ratings chasing, while content with revenue potential is ’stripped to feed the newsroom beast’.

Full story at this link…

Similar posts:

• Editor&Publisher: Should newspapers forget paywalls and focus on online ads?
• Folio: Publishers relishing iPhone apps
• Social Media Journalist: ‘USG is the most overrated social media ‘news’ craze’ Jack Lail, Knoxville News Sentinel
• InPublishing survey: ‘Behind the turnover figures, the industry is essentially still in profit’
• TheStreet.com: New York Times looks to newspaper ‘Tablets’

NMK: ‘What happens to newspapers?’ – place your bets, please

Rounding off last night’s discussion panel hosted by New Media Knowledge on the future of the newspaper industry, panelists were asked what or who they would put their money on for success and survival over the next few years.

Martin Stabe, media blogger, former new media editor of Press Gazette and online editor of Retail Week, plumped for niche and expert content:

“I would bet on anyone who can create unique, high quality content. I’d bet on the Financial Times, the Wall Street Journal – those corners of more generalist publications that become more expert,” he said.

Newspapers need to have ‘the ability to compete with all the freely produced expert content that is sometimes better than what is produced by the professionals’, he added.

Neil McIntosh, head of editorial development at Guardian.co.uk, agreed that niche coverage could help newspapers compete with the blogosphere.

“In areas where blogs are working really well, mainstream media has two options: to raise its game and start covering those niches better; or it can get out and as Jeff Jarvis says, ‘do what you do best, and link to the rest’,” said McIntosh

“Those are two areas where mainstream media can move forward but it’s about acknowledging that this world exists.”

Assistant editor at Telegraph Media Group, Justin Williams said trusted brands and content areas such as finance, politics and certain sports are best placed to survive.

“Brands that are trusted and valued no matter how they are produced, those brands will still be here in 10 years time. You’re looking at areas like finance, politics, certain kinds of sport, where we still thrive. During the financial crisis most of us have turned to established news outlets,” said Williams.

“We’re positioned in those markets already, if we can hone in on what’s important to our readers and deliver it in a smart way, then we [newspapers] can be here in 10 years time.”

Similar posts:

• Jeffrey McManus: Consulting for free on ‘How to save journalism’
• Former Total Politics editor to start up PR company
• Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – advice on social media etiquette
• What’s new in the WSJ.com redesign
• Women don’t fare too well on the power league lists

NMK: ‘Prism of newspapers’ restricting online innovation, says Telegraph assistant editor

Are there people in the media currently who can take the ‘radical action’ required to drive newspapers forward, Justin Williams, assistant editor of Telegraph Media Group, asked an industry gathering last night.

Speaking at New Media Knowledge’s (NMK) ‘What happens to newspapers?’ event, Williams said the Telegraph had ‘dropped the baton’ after it launched online and ’seeded the ground for the Guardian very quickly’.

“We’ve been playing catch up for the last two or three years. What is required is radical action. I’m not certain at the moment we have the people in the industry who have the ideas to be radical enough. I think we’re constantly behind the curve with technological change and development,” he said.

“No matter how fantastic our newsroom looks and our web-first model is, we still look at things through the prism of newspapers.”

This ‘prism of newspapers’ is driving publishers to look at e-reading and e-paper technology, which is tied to the idea of print and, if the current fortunes of the print format are considered, ‘the world has moved so far beyond’, Williams said.

Yet changes may be driven by new recruits at the Telegraph, including ’some pretty young people’, who ‘think utterly differently about what we [the Telegraph] publish and how we interact with it’.

New staff, he added, have been challenging the traditional idea of linear storytelling, suggesting a more ‘horizontal’ approach, for example starting with an interactive idea rather than a text article.

“They’re not necessarily coming from a news editor deciding what the agenda is and driving it down through the chain. It’s actually picking up on something that’s far more ethereal. It’s not user-generated content, it’s something far more nebular than that. It seems to feed an appetite,” explained Williams.

The title is keen to employ people who are ‘able to manipulate data in innovative ways’, he added. A specialist in data and mapping is currently being sought, though the paper has struggled to find the right candidate as yet, Williams said.

Similar posts:

• NMK: Telegraph uses Dipity in aggregation first
• CounterValue: FT’s Newsroom 2009 and why CMS tech is holding publishers back
• NMK: ‘What happens to newspapers?’ – place your bets, please
• Malcolm Coles: MPs’ expenses – the best of the web
• INM signs £40m print deal in Northern Ireland

NMK: Telegraph uses Dipity in aggregation first

Speaking at New Media Knowledge’s (NMK) ‘What happens to newspapers?’ event last night, Justin Williams, assistant editor at Telegraph Media Group, drew the audience’s attention to a new aggregation feature being used in Telegraph.co.uk’s recently relaunched finance channel.

A timeline of the current global recession has been created using free third-party tool Dipity. The timeline, which can also be viewed as a map, flipbook or list, aggregates both Telegraph content and items – predominantly news articles – from other titles.

Aggregating from external sources, which in this instance include the Wall Street Journal, Washington Post and CNN Money, is a first for the site, Williams said.

Similar posts:

• Evening Leader plots UFO sightings with Dipity
• Liverpool Daily Post runs online diary to mark capital of culture status
• @press_freedom: a new Twitter service from Journalism.co.uk
• More from Dipity: Manchester Evening News plots congestion charge coverage
• NMK: ‘Prism of newspapers’ restricting online innovation, says Telegraph assistant editor

Grauniad.co.uk v Torygraph.co.uk: Round 374

We’ve been following the various Telegraph/Guardian online interactions this week:

Yesterday, Roy Greenslade published an anonymous email from a Telegraph hack, who wrote that he/she was more than a little bit fed up.  The gist of the email was that all this multimedia-ised hub-it-up lark is to the detriment of a good, healthy working life and quality journalism.

Greenslade cautiously said he was printing the letter but that he didn’t necessarily agree with its sentiment.

Over at CounterValues, Telegraph assistant editor Justin Williams was quick to pooh pooh it. And now Greenslade has put up his response to the letter – a more negative stance this time: ‘the past is another country, think positive,’ he tells his ‘emailing friend’.

Meanwhile, in another post, Williams took a swipe at the Guardian’s system of buying sponsored links and keywords. He reckons their buying is well in excess of the Telegraph’s and the Times’.

In the comments below the post, Charles Arthur, the Guardian’s technology editor, asks how many subsidised paper subscriptions the Telegraph has: ‘Is [buying sponsored links and keywords] a worse or better investment than subsidising paper subscriptions, do you think?’, he writes.

Charles Arthur is a keen Twitterer and I’ve just located Justin Williams on Twitter; all that Tweeting in agreement can be a bit boring: how about getting the discussion going in Twitterland? It’s a shame this didn’t get going earlier, with it being (unofficial?) ’speak like a pirate day’ – that would make it fun.

Can’t wait for next week’s ABCes…

Similar posts:

• TBC at high noon? Telegraph-Guardian spats
• NMK: Telegraph uses Dipity in aggregation first
• CounterValue: FT’s Newsroom 2009 and why CMS tech is holding publishers back
• NMK: ‘Prism of newspapers’ restricting online innovation, says Telegraph assistant editor
• Justin Williams: The UK’s independent local news sites mapped