<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; Blog &#187; automated services</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/tag/automated-services/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Poynter Online: Limitations of automated news tweets</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/02/poynter-online-limitations-of-automated-news-tweets/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/02/poynter-online-limitations-of-automated-news-tweets/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 09:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Amy Gahran]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[automated services]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Wall Street Journal]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11702</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Amy Gahran shows us why automated services can sometimes make for funny news descriptions:
This was a tweet from the Wall Street Journal on June 27:
&#8220;BREAKING NEWS: Prosecutors get a $170 billion judgment against Bernard Madoff. Ruth Madoff agrees to give up nearly all ass..&#8221;

Gahran says:
&#8220;The Journal, like some other news organizations, uses a popular service [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F07%2F02%2Fpoynter-online-limitations-of-automated-news-tweets%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F07%2F02%2Fpoynter-online-limitations-of-automated-news-tweets%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>Amy Gahran shows us why automated services can sometimes make for funny news descriptions:</p>
<p>This was <a href="http://twitter.com/WSJ/status/2353071349" target="_blank">a tweet from the Wall Street Journal</a> on June 27:</p>
<blockquote><p><span class="status-body"><span class="entry-content">&#8220;BREAKING NEWS: Prosecutors get a $170 billion judgment against Bernard Madoff. Ruth Madoff agrees to give up nearly all ass..&#8221;</span></span></p>
</blockquote>
<p>Gahran says:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;The Journal, like some other news organizations, uses a popular service called Twitterfeed to automatically generate tweets based on an RSS feed. Normally, I&#8217;m all in favor of automation that saves time and effort, but Twitter is one place where automation usually doesn&#8217;t work, especially for news.&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.poynter.org/column.asp?id=31&amp;aid=166106" target="_blank">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/23/how-to-track-a-conversation-in-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="January 23, 2009">How to: Track a conversation in Twitter</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/11/how-to-publish-twitter-streams-on-news-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="February 11, 2009">How to publish Twitter streams on news sites?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/05/twitter-geolocation-what-uses-for-newsrooms/" rel="bookmark" title="October 5, 2009">Twitter geolocation: what uses for newsrooms?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/19/adrian-short-building-a-local-news-mashup/" rel="bookmark" title="March 19, 2009">Adrian Short: Building a local news mashup</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/28/publish2-blog-introducing-social-journalism-tools-to-publish2/" rel="bookmark" title="July 28, 2009">Publish2 Blog: Introducing &#8217;social journalism&#8217; tools to Publish2</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.656 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/02/poynter-online-limitations-of-automated-news-tweets/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
