<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#039; Blog &#187; Traffic</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/category/traffic/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 18:16:48 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>The Media Blog: What&#8217;s the value of a journalist that Twitters?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/05/the-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/05/the-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 09:25:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abce]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15670</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Chie Elliott looks into the relationship between journalists that use Twitter and the Audit Bureau of Circulations Electronic (ABCe) results for their respective titles in this post.
&#8220;Media people are using Twitter as an instrument for sharing and crowdsourcing, for networking and live-reporting. A journalist with a popular blog or social media presence can only be [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F11%2F05%2Fthe-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F11%2F05%2Fthe-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>Chie Elliott looks into the relationship between journalists that use Twitter and the Audit Bureau of Circulations Electronic (ABCe) results for their respective titles in this post.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Media people are using Twitter as an instrument for sharing and crowdsourcing, for networking and live-reporting. A journalist with a popular blog or social media presence can only be positive for the publication&#8217;s brand. If Twitter is a waste of work time, time has never been so well wasted. Furthermore, if a journalist is creating content while simultaneously publicising the content carrier, isn&#8217;t that doing two jobs for the price of one?&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p>via <a href="http://themediablog.typepad.com/the-media-blog/2009/11/1537041109-telegraph-guardian-daily-mail-twitter-journalists-tweet-money.html">The Media Blog: Are journalists who tweet value for money?</a>.</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/10/social-media-journalist-bbc-journalists-are-increasingly-discovering-and-using-delicious-to-collaborate-and-turn-research-into-content-robin-hamman-bbc-senior-broadcast-journalist/" rel="bookmark" title="March 10, 2008">Social Media Journalist: &#8220;BBC journalists are increasingly using Del.icio.us to collaborate and turn research into content&#8221; Robin Hamman, BBC Senior Broadcast Journalist</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/19/tweet-stream-of-the-cfund-debate-new-business-models-for-media/" rel="bookmark" title="February 19, 2009">Tweet stream of the #cfund debate: &#8216;New business models for media&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/09/02/media-ignorance-of-social-work-industry-suggested-by-comcare-survey/" rel="bookmark" title="September 2, 2009">Media ignorance of social work industry suggested by ComCare survey</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/17/adam-westbrook-6x6-branding-for-freelance-journalists/" rel="bookmark" title="August 17, 2009">Adam Westbrook: 6&#215;6 branding for freelance journalists</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/05/27/follow-all-day-broadcast-interview-tips-here-via-newsleader/" rel="bookmark" title="May 27, 2009">12 hours worth of radio interview tips from @NewsLeader</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.664 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/05/the-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malcolm Coles: Growth of newspaper Twitter accounts running out of steam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/03/malcolm-coles-growth-of-newspaper-twitter-accounts-running-out-of-steam/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/03/malcolm-coles-growth-of-newspaper-twitter-accounts-running-out-of-steam/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 03 Nov 2009 12:07:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malcolm coles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15599</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is a cross-post from Malcolm Coles&#8217; personal website. You can read other posts by Coles on the Journalism.co.uk Editors&#8217; Blog at this link.
UK national newspaper Twitter accounts are continuing to grow &#8211; but at an ever slower rate, according to the latest figures for the 130 accounts I&#8217;m tracking:

July to August growth: 17 per [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmalcolm-coles-growth-of-newspaper-twitter-accounts-running-out-of-steam%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F11%2F03%2Fmalcolm-coles-growth-of-newspaper-twitter-accounts-running-out-of-steam%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p><em>This is a cross-post from <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/tag/twitter-statistics/" target="_blank">Malcolm Coles&#8217; personal website</a>. You can read <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/tag/malcolm-coles" target="_blank">other posts by Coles on the Journalism.co.uk Editors&#8217; Blog at this link</a>.</em></p>
<p>UK national newspaper Twitter accounts are continuing to grow &#8211; but at an ever slower rate, according to the latest figures for the 130 accounts I&#8217;m tracking:</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/uk-newspaper-twitter-august/">July to August growth</a>: 17 per cent</li>
<li><a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/uk-newspaper-twitter-september/">August to September growth</a>: 17 per cent</li>
<li><a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/newspaper-twitter-october-2009/">September to October growth</a>: 13.1 per cent</li>
<li><strong>October to November growth: 8.3 per cent<br />
</strong></li>
</ul>
<p><strong>The detail</strong><br />
These 130 accounts had 1,801,811 followers on November 2, up by 137,568 from 1,664,243 on October 1. Of that increase, 95,007 (or 69 per cent) was for the @guardiantech account (which benefits from being on Twitter&#8217;s suggested user list).</p>
<p>(NB &#8211; the Telegraph seems to have deleted its badly spelled @TelegraphScienc account, so I&#8217;ve restated October&#8217;s figures to be for 130 accounts, rather than the 131 I used to track).</p>
<p>The biggest mover was @MirrorFootball, up 11 places to 81st (from 455 to 809 followers), suggesting the Mirror is finally making some use of Twitter (most of its other accounts are near the bottom &#8211; and only appear to have moved up a place because of the demise of the Telegraph&#8217;s Science account).</p>
<p>As ever, <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tycNgQjOwWtSG7XzmgzqZOA&amp;single=true&amp;gid=0&amp;output=html">the full spreadsheet is here</a> or you can see the iframe below.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tycNgQjOwWtSG7XzmgzqZOA&#038;single=true&#038;gid=0&#038;output=html" width="490" height="600" frameborder="0" scrolling="yes"></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/07/malcolm-coles-rate-of-growth-slows-for-newspaper-twitter-accounts/" rel="bookmark" title="October 7, 2009">Malcolm Coles: Rate of growth slows for newspaper Twitter accounts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/07/a-guide-to-newspapers-on-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="July 7, 2009">A guide to newspapers on Twitter</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/how-the-guardian-and-telegraph-overtook-the-mail-in-latest-abce-traffic-report/" rel="bookmark" title="October 26, 2009">How the Guardian and Telegraph overtook the Mail in latest ABCe traffic report</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/19/tip-of-the-day-from-journalism-co-uk-getting-rid-of-spam-followers/" rel="bookmark" title="August 19, 2009">#Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; getting rid of spam followers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/30/malcolm-coles-how-us-traffic-is-vital-for-uk-newspaper-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="July 30, 2009">Malcolm Coles: How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.627 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/03/malcolm-coles-growth-of-newspaper-twitter-accounts-running-out-of-steam/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How the Guardian and Telegraph overtook the Mail in latest ABCe traffic report</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/how-the-guardian-and-telegraph-overtook-the-mail-in-latest-abce-traffic-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/how-the-guardian-and-telegraph-overtook-the-mail-in-latest-abce-traffic-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 11:30:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[abces]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[guardian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mail Online]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malcolm coles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[telegraph]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15314</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This post originally appeared on Malcolm Coles&#8217; blog at this link. 
June 2009 saw the Mail Online unexpectedly overtake both the Guardian and Telegraph in the ABCes with the most monthly unique users partly on the back of US traffic and Michael Jackson stories, a position it held for both July and August.
Fast forward to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F10%2F26%2Fhow-the-guardian-and-telegraph-overtook-the-mail-in-latest-abce-traffic-report%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F10%2F26%2Fhow-the-guardian-and-telegraph-overtook-the-mail-in-latest-abce-traffic-report%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p><em>This post originally appeared <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/september-abces-uk-abroad/" target="_blank">on Malcolm Coles&#8217; blog at this link</a>. </em></p>
<p>June 2009 <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/535251.php" target="_blank">saw the Mail Online unexpectedly overtake</a> both the Guardian and Telegraph in the <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/tag/abce/">ABCes</a> with the most monthly unique users partly on the back of <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/june-2009-abce-analysis/">US traffic and Michael Jackson stories</a>, a position it held for both July and August.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/536228.php" target="_blank">Fast forward to September</a> and the story is the same as earlier in the year &#8211; Guardian 1st, Telegraph 2nd and Mail 3rd. So what changed from June to September? To find out, I&#8217;ve compared the ABCe figures for UK and foreign visitors in June and September. The difference between the Guardian&#8217;s performance and that of the Telegraph and Mail is revealing.</p>
<h4>Analysis: The Guardian has seen significant growth in the UK AND abroad.</h4>
<p><em>Table: September unique visitors (millions) and percentage change since June</em></p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Change</strong></td>
<td><strong>UK</strong></td>
<td><strong>Change</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Overseas</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Guardian</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">33m</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">14%</td>
<td>11.9m</td>
<td>17%</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">21.1m</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">12%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<h4></h4>
<p>The Guardian&#8217;s total visitor numbers grew 14 per cent from June to September (up from 29m to 33m). There was a 17 per cent increase in UK visitors and a 12 per cent increase in visitors from abroad. This makes it the most popular online newspaper in the UK by some way (it&#8217;s 2.4m ahead of the Mail in second place).</p>
<p>UK visitors accounted for 36 per cent of the total in September (barely changed from 35 per cent in June).</p>
<p><strong>Analysis: Telegraph sees growth overseas </strong></p>
<p><em>Table: September unique visitors, percentage change since June</em></p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Change</strong></td>
<td><strong>UK</strong></td>
<td><strong>Change</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Overseas</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Telegraph</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">31m</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">14%</td>
<td>9.1m</td>
<td>-1%</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">21.9m</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">22%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Telegraph has also seen a 14 per cent increase in total visitors from June (27.2m) to September (31m).</p>
<p>However, the geographical breakdown is revealing &#8211; its UK unique visitor numbers are down one per cent from June to August but its overseas visitors are up 22 per cent (from 18m to 21.9m). It&#8217;s now the most visited UK newspaper abroad &#8211; but only the 3rd most visited inside the UK.</p>
<p>As a result, the proportion of its visitors that comes from the UK has fallen from 34 per cent to 29 per cent &#8211; the lowest of any UK newspaper (the Mail <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/usa-traffic-uk-newspapers/">held this honour back in June</a>).</p>
<p>The Telegraph saw the biggest increase in overseas visitors of any newspaper &#8211; but because its UK traffic fell, the Guardian beat it into 2nd place.</p>
<p><strong>Analaysis: Mail Online records UK growth only<br />
</strong></p>
<p><em>Table: September unique visitors, percentage change since June</em></p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr>
<td></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Total</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Change</strong></td>
<td><strong>UK</strong></td>
<td><strong>Change</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Overseas</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0"><strong>Change</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td><strong>Daily Mail<br />
</strong></td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">30m</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">2%</td>
<td>9.5m</td>
<td>15%</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">20.6m</td>
<td bgcolor="#c0c0c0">-2%</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<p>The Mail&#8217;s traffic stood fairly still between June and September &#8211; it had 30m visitors last month, up just two per cent on three months ago. But its story is the reverse of the Telegraph&#8217;s.</p>
<p>The Mail saw strong UK growth &#8211; up 14 per cent to 9.5m visitors in three months. Overseas visitors, however, fell by 2 per cent to 20.6m. As a result, it now gets 32 per cent of its visitors from the UK (up from 28 per cent in June).</p>
<p><strong>And the rest &#8230;</strong></p>
<p>As for the others:</p>
<ul>
<li><strong>The Sun</strong> is down to 23m visitors in September, an 8 per cent fall over 3 months. A 15 per cent collapse in overseas visitors couldn&#8217;t make up for a 3 per cent increase in UK users.</li>
<li><strong>The Times</strong> is a story of decline &#8211; 13 per cent down overall, with a 10 per cent fall in the UK and a 14 per cent fall from overseas.</li>
<li>The same is true of the<strong> Mirror Group</strong> (down 5 per cent overall) and the <strong>Independent </strong>(down 6 per cent overall) but to a lesser extent<strong>.</strong></li>
</ul>
<p>This table has all the stats. If you can&#8217;t see the iframe, you can <a href="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tiirybcrYI76jHpOcbIqBBQ&amp;single=true&amp;gid=0&amp;output=html">see the full spreadsheet here</a>.</p>
<p>The Express doesn&#8217;t take part in the ABCes. The FT does not participate every month.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/536228.php?cmd=Search&amp;rssOutputSectionID=67&amp;searchTags=abces" target="_blank">Journalism.co.uk ABCes coverage at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/27/malcolm-coles-michael-jacksons-kids-made-the-daily-mail-the-most-visited-uk-newspaper-site-in-june/" rel="bookmark" title="July 27, 2009">Malcolm Coles: Michael Jackson&#8217;s kids made the Daily Mail the most visited UK newspaper site in June</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/30/malcolm-coles-how-us-traffic-is-vital-for-uk-newspaper-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="July 30, 2009">Malcolm Coles: How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/07/malcolm-coles-rate-of-growth-slows-for-newspaper-twitter-accounts/" rel="bookmark" title="October 7, 2009">Malcolm Coles: Rate of growth slows for newspaper Twitter accounts</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/05/how-sticky-are-uk-newspaper-sites-62-8-per-cent-of-users-look-at-just-one-page-says-alexa/" rel="bookmark" title="August 5, 2009">How sticky are UK newspaper sites? 62.8 per cent of users look at just one page, says Alexa</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/22/guardian-mail-website-has-most-overseas-users/" rel="bookmark" title="January 22, 2008">Guardian: Mail website has most overseas users</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.922 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/how-the-guardian-and-telegraph-overtook-the-mail-in-latest-abce-traffic-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NOTW website sees record traffic after Stephen Gately report</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/16/notw-website-sees-record-traffic-after-stephen-gately-report/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/16/notw-website-sees-record-traffic-after-stephen-gately-report/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Oct 2009 14:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Harriet Massing</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[News of the World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[notw]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=14979</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Visitor numbers to the News of the World&#8217;s website reached a record daily high of 585,000 last Sunday, according to the title. NOTW&#8217;s of pop singer Stephen Gately&#8217;s death, which ran that day, boosted the total, with 290,000 visits for that one day.
The traffic surge caused the website to proclaim victory of its printed rival [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F10%2F16%2Fnotw-website-sees-record-traffic-after-stephen-gately-report%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F10%2F16%2Fnotw-website-sees-record-traffic-after-stephen-gately-report%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>Visitor numbers to the News of the World&#8217;s website reached a record daily high of 585,000 last Sunday, according to the title. NOTW&#8217;s of pop singer Stephen Gately&#8217;s death, which ran that day, boosted the total, with 290,000 visits for that one day.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">The traffic surge caused the website to proclaim victory of its printed rival The People, which sold fewer copies in print on the same day, the NOTW release boasted.</p>
<p style="margin-bottom: 0cm;">In comparison with <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/535924.php" target="_blank">last month&#8217;s Audit Bureau of Circulations Electronic (ABCe) average daily unique user figures for other national newspaper sites</a>, 585,000 may be a record for the News of the World, but other papers&#8217; sites posted higher figures for August. Admittedly the NOTW figure was UK-only visitors, but average daily visits for TheSun.co.uk last month, for example, was 1,411,227.</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/06/18/shropshire-star-posts-59-rise-in-page-impressions/" rel="bookmark" title="June 18, 2008">Shropshire Star posts 59% rise in page impressions</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/10/hellomagazine-revamps-health-and-beauty-section/" rel="bookmark" title="July 10, 2008">Hellomagazine revamps health and beauty section</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/30/abce-success-for-dennis-publishing/" rel="bookmark" title="October 30, 2008">ABCe success for Dennis Publishing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/30/guardian-debuts-six-monthly-abce-figures-for-regional-websites/" rel="bookmark" title="September 30, 2008">Guardian debuts six-monthly ABCe figures for regional websites</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/18/mediaguardian-abce-audits-under-review/" rel="bookmark" title="July 18, 2008">MediaGuardian: ABCe audits under review</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.600 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/16/notw-website-sees-record-traffic-after-stephen-gately-report/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Malcolm Coles: Rate of growth slows for newspaper Twitter accounts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/07/malcolm-coles-rate-of-growth-slows-for-newspaper-twitter-accounts/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/07/malcolm-coles-rate-of-growth-slows-for-newspaper-twitter-accounts/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 15:50:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malcolm coles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=14686</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is a cross-post from Malcolm Coles&#8217; website www.malcolmcoles.co.uk.
National UK newspapers had 1,665,202 followers for their Twitter accounts at the start of October &#8211; an increase of 193,266 on September 1 (when they had 1,471,936).
The rate of growth has slowed, however. This is a monthly increase of 13.1 per cent, compared with 17 per cent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F10%2F07%2Fmalcolm-coles-rate-of-growth-slows-for-newspaper-twitter-accounts%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F10%2F07%2Fmalcolm-coles-rate-of-growth-slows-for-newspaper-twitter-accounts%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p><em>This is <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/newspaper-twitter-october-2009/" target="_blank">a cross-post</a> from Malcolm Coles&#8217; website <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk" target="_blank">www.malcolmcoles.co.uk</a>.</em></p>
<p>National UK newspapers had 1,665,202 followers for their Twitter accounts at the start of October &#8211; <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/uk-newspaper-twitter-september/" target="_blank">an increase of 193,266 on September 1 (when they had 1,471,936)</a>.</p>
<p>The rate of growth has slowed, however. This is a monthly increase of 13.1 per cent, compared with 17 per cent from August 1 to September 1, and also from July 1 to August 1.</p>
<p>What&#8217;s more, 151,555 of the increase (or 78 per cent of the total) is down to just one account &#8211; that of @guardiantech (which owes its popularity to its place on the Twitter Suggested User List). Indeed, of the 131 accounts I&#8217;m tracking, <a href="http://www.twitter.com/malcolmcoles" target="_blank">51 have fewer followers than me</a>!</p>
<p>You can <a href="http://redirectingat.com/?id=720X1336&amp;url=http%3A%2F%2Fspreadsheets.google.com%2Fpub%3Fkey%3DtuInnvfKGdSwupkHZhKAbeA%26single%3Dtrue%26gid%3D0%26output%3Dhtml" target="_blank">see the full table here</a>, or below.</p>
<p><iframe src="http://spreadsheets.google.com/pub?key=tuInnvfKGdSwupkHZhKAbeA&#038;single=true&#038;gid=0&#038;output=html" width="490" height="600" frameborder="0" scrolling="yes"></iframe></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/11/03/malcolm-coles-growth-of-newspaper-twitter-accounts-running-out-of-steam/" rel="bookmark" title="November 3, 2009">Malcolm Coles: Growth of newspaper Twitter accounts running out of steam</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/07/a-guide-to-newspapers-on-twitter/" rel="bookmark" title="July 7, 2009">A guide to newspapers on Twitter</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/how-the-guardian-and-telegraph-overtook-the-mail-in-latest-abce-traffic-report/" rel="bookmark" title="October 26, 2009">How the Guardian and Telegraph overtook the Mail in latest ABCe traffic report</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/19/tip-of-the-day-from-journalism-co-uk-getting-rid-of-spam-followers/" rel="bookmark" title="August 19, 2009">#Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk &#8211; getting rid of spam followers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/21/venturebeat-twitter-launching-commercial-accounts/" rel="bookmark" title="August 21, 2009">VentureBeat: Twitter launching commercial accounts</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.750 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/07/malcolm-coles-rate-of-growth-slows-for-newspaper-twitter-accounts/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Greenslade: Mirror.co.uk on metrics and building loyal online audiences</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/02/greenslade-mirror-co-uk-on-metrics-and-building-loyal-online-audiences/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/02/greenslade-mirror-co-uk-on-metrics-and-building-loyal-online-audiences/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 08:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[3am.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Matt Kelly]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mirror.co.uk]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[MirrorFootball.co.uk]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=14491</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Roy Greenslade reports on Daily Mirror associate editor Matt Kelly&#8217;s presentation at this week&#8217;s World Editors Forum conference in Prague.
Much has already been made of Mirror.co.uk&#8217;s decisions to launch separate sites for its main traffic drivers (Mirrorfootball.co.uk and 3am.co.uk) -  in particular the sites&#8217; attitude towards search engine optimisation (or lack of it).
Speaking at the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F10%2F02%2Fgreenslade-mirror-co-uk-on-metrics-and-building-loyal-online-audiences%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F10%2F02%2Fgreenslade-mirror-co-uk-on-metrics-and-building-loyal-online-audiences%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>Roy Greenslade reports on Daily Mirror associate editor Matt Kelly&#8217;s presentation at this week&#8217;s World Editors Forum conference in Prague.</p>
<p>Much has already been made of <a href="http://www.journalism.co.uk/2/articles/535513.php" target="_blank">Mirror.co.uk&#8217;s decisions to launch separate sites for its main traffic drivers (Mirrorfootball.co.uk and 3am.co.uk)</a> -  in particular <a href="http://paidcontent.co.uk/article/419-wtf-mirrors-new-3am.co.uk-is-ballsy-and-bitchy-in-spades/" target="_blank">the sites&#8217; attitude towards search engine optimisation (or lack of it)</a>.</p>
<p>Speaking at the industry event, Kelly challenged the metrics used to measure web traffic:</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;According to Kelly, &#8216;users&#8217; (a sterile description) are people who discover content through Google, devour it, and  then return to their search engine to look for more elsewhere,&#8221; writes Greenslade.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>As a result users car less about the sites they visit and advertisers are less willing to spend cash to attract them, Kelly added.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;Until we bite the bullet and forget about this mad race for users, and focus instead on building engaged, loyal audiences, we will continue to see the value of our content erode online,&#8221; said Kelly, who added that slow growth of engaged audiences should be the aim for news groups online.</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/greenslade/2009/oct/01/daily-mirror-digital-media">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/03/25/ojr-using-google-trends-to-fine-tune-your-news-website/" rel="bookmark" title="March 25, 2008">OJR: Using Google Trends to fine-tune your news website</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/22/publishers-vertical-search-can-rival-google-says-aop-forum/" rel="bookmark" title="January 22, 2008">Publishers&#8217; vertical search can rival Google, says AOP forum</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/29/bbc-trust-bbccouk-internal-search-and-external-linking-need-major-improvements/" rel="bookmark" title="May 29, 2008">BBC Trust: bbc.co.uk internal search and external linking need &#8216;major improvements&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/10/the-associated-press-google-updates-search-index-with-old-magazines/" rel="bookmark" title="December 10, 2008">The Associated Press: Google updates search index with old magazines</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/08/pixsta-develops-image-to-image-search-engine/" rel="bookmark" title="May 8, 2008">PIXSTA develops &#8216;image-to-image&#8217; search engine</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.791 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/02/greenslade-mirror-co-uk-on-metrics-and-building-loyal-online-audiences/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Twitter tops BBC for monthly traffic, while BBC Online click-throughs exceed 10m</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/28/twitter-tops-bbc-for-monthly-traffic-while-bbc-online-click-throughs-exceed-10m/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/28/twitter-tops-bbc-for-monthly-traffic-while-bbc-online-click-throughs-exceed-10m/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:09:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Danielle Colyer</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Social media and blogging]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[BBC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[social networking]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Twitter]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=13428</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
More than 50 million people used Twitter last month &#8211; an increase of more than 7 million from June, according to new data.
The website, which attracted 51.6 million unique users in July, now outranks the BBC and Craigslist in terms of monthly visitors. It has also become one of the top 50 most popular websites [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F08%2F28%2Ftwitter-tops-bbc-for-monthly-traffic-while-bbc-online-click-throughs-exceed-10m%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F08%2F28%2Ftwitter-tops-bbc-for-monthly-traffic-while-bbc-online-click-throughs-exceed-10m%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>More than 50 million people used <a href="http://twitter.com" target="_blank">Twitter</a> last month &#8211; an increase of more than 7 million from June, according to new data.</p>
<p>The website, which attracted 51.6 million unique users in July, now outranks the BBC and Craigslist in terms of monthly visitors. It has also become one of the top 50 most popular websites in the world, according to <a href="http://www.netimperative.com/news/2009/august/twitter-now-2018more-popular-than-bbc2019-online" target="_blank">the research by comscore.com</a>.</p>
<p><a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/bbcinternet/2009/08/feedback_on_the_open_meeting.html">Meanwhile BBC Online&#8217;s controller Seetha Kumar reported in a BBC blog post</a> that the number of click-throughs experienced by the site stands at 10-12 million each month.  The blog, posted as a response to the BBC&#8217;s first online &#8216;open meeting&#8217; on August 14, revealed that users were dissatisfied with BBC Online&#8217;s use of external links.</p>
<p>Kumar said: &#8220;We want to establish new and richer connections to the wider web where they are editorially relevant and meet our public purposes. We know that our users want us to do this and it&#8217;s a process that we take very seriously&#8221;</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/05/thisismoneycouk-sees-traffic-surge-in-economic-downturn/" rel="bookmark" title="November 5, 2008">ThisisMoney.co.uk sees traffic surge in economic downturn</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/29/how-did-the-national-newspaper-online-sites-report-the-august-abces/" rel="bookmark" title="September 29, 2008">How did the national newspaper online sites report the August ABCes?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/07/bbc-internet-blog-seetha-kumar-on-more-social-media-for-bbc-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="October 7, 2009">BBC Internet Blog: Seetha Kumar on more social media for BBC sites</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/22/has-ditching-print-edition-damaged-post-intelligencers-web-traffic/" rel="bookmark" title="April 22, 2009">Has ditching print edition damaged Post-Intelligencer&#8217;s web traffic?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/08/19/bbcs-online-olympics-coverage-draws-44m/" rel="bookmark" title="August 19, 2008">BBC&#8217;s online Olympics coverage draws 4.4m</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.728 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/28/twitter-tops-bbc-for-monthly-traffic-while-bbc-online-click-throughs-exceed-10m/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Peter Preston: Advertisers needs transparency in metrics to move online</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/17/peter-preston-advertisers-needs-transparency-in-metrics-to-move-online/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/17/peter-preston-advertisers-needs-transparency-in-metrics-to-move-online/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 Aug 2009 07:52:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Advertising]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[ABC]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[nielsen]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[web metrics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=13032</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
&#8220;[P]art of the answer to not enough advertising revenue lies in serving the advertiser better,&#8221; writes Preston, referencing last week&#8217;s results of an inquiry into reporting of newspaper bulks as a step towards greater transparency of circulation figures.
But there isn&#8217;t an international standard for web traffic measurement to news sites and the difference between current [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F08%2F17%2Fpeter-preston-advertisers-needs-transparency-in-metrics-to-move-online%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F08%2F17%2Fpeter-preston-advertisers-needs-transparency-in-metrics-to-move-online%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>&#8220;[P]art of the answer to not enough advertising revenue lies in serving the advertiser better,&#8221; writes Preston, referencing last week&#8217;s results of an inquiry into reporting of newspaper bulks as a step towards greater transparency of circulation figures.</p>
<p>But there isn&#8217;t an international standard for web traffic measurement to news sites and the difference between current methodologies (e.g. those of Nielsen in the US and the Audit Bureau of Circulations in the UK) could leave advertisers feeling lost, he says.</p>
<blockquote><p>&#8220;It ought to be simple. The information is there online. But if you can&#8217;t extricate it, how do you expect more than a few categories of internet advertising to break through to good prices in great quantity?&#8221;</p>
</blockquote>
<p><a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/organgrinder/2009/aug/16/press-publishing-peter-preston">Full post at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/08/15/independentcouk-gossip-sites-put-heat-on-celeb-mags-in-latest-abcs/" rel="bookmark" title="August 15, 2008">Independent.co.uk: Gossip sites put heat on celeb mags in latest ABCs</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/04/increase-in-uk-online-display-advertising-activity-says-nielsen/" rel="bookmark" title="June 4, 2009">Increase in UK online display advertising activity, says Nielsen</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/30/abc-us-circulation-regulators-reduce-costs-for-newspapers/" rel="bookmark" title="July 30, 2008">ABC: US circulation regulators reduce costs for newspapers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/10/27/wsjcom-major-us-newspaper-circulations-continue-to-fall/" rel="bookmark" title="October 27, 2008">WSJ.com: Major US newspaper circulations continue to fall</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/09/magculturecom-abc-should-support-more-mag-innovation/" rel="bookmark" title="June 9, 2009">magCulture.com: ABC should support more mag innovation</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 5.673 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/17/peter-preston-advertisers-needs-transparency-in-metrics-to-move-online/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hitwise: More traffic going to content websites than transactional sites</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/14/hitwise-more-traffic-going-to-content-websites-than-transactional-sites/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/14/hitwise-more-traffic-going-to-content-websites-than-transactional-sites/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:20:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Editors' pick]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e - commerce]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12988</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
Hitwise&#8217;s Robin Goad takes a look at trends in UK internet visits over the last three years. The figures suggest that traffic to social networking sites, news and media, and entertainment sites is outpacing that to transactional sites e.g. shopping and classifieds sites.
&#8220;[J]ust because people are using the web more, that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F08%2F14%2Fhitwise-more-traffic-going-to-content-websites-than-transactional-sites%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F08%2F14%2Fhitwise-more-traffic-going-to-content-websites-than-transactional-sites%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p>Hitwise&#8217;s Robin Goad takes a look at trends in UK internet visits over the last three years. The figures suggest that traffic to social networking sites, news and media, and entertainment sites is outpacing that to transactional sites e.g. shopping and classifieds sites.</p>
<p>&#8220;[J]ust because people are using the web more, that doesn&#8217;t necessarily mean that they are spending more money online,&#8221; he writes.</p>
<p><a href="http://weblogs.hitwise.com/robin-goad/2009/08/content_driven_websites_receiv.html">Full analysis and charts at this link&#8230;</a></p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/11/news-numeracy-online-tools-for-reporting-numbers/" rel="bookmark" title="August 11, 2009">News numeracy: online tools for reporting numbers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/26/rww-on-adsense-and-hitwise-on-twitter-and-retailers/" rel="bookmark" title="June 26, 2009">RWW on AdSense and Hitwise on Twitter and retailers</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/16/hitwise-guardian-receives-more-traffic-from-twitter-than-competitors/" rel="bookmark" title="March 16, 2009">Hitwise: &#8216;Guardian receives more traffic from Twitter than competitors&#8217;</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/12/survey-showing-that-trust-in-the-uk%e2%80%99s-national-media-is-on-the-up-actually-shows-nothing/" rel="bookmark" title="September 12, 2008">Survey showing that &#8216;trust in the UK’s national media is on the up&#8217; actually shows nothing</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/11/ernst-young-online-search-will-help-reverse-fortunes-of-display-and-classified-ads/" rel="bookmark" title="February 11, 2009">Ernst &#038; Young: Online search will help reverse fortunes of display and classified ads</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.164 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/14/hitwise-more-traffic-going-to-content-websites-than-transactional-sites/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>How sticky are UK newspaper sites? 62.8 per cent of users look at just one page, says Alexa</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/05/how-sticky-are-uk-newspaper-sites-62-8-per-cent-of-users-look-at-just-one-page-says-alexa/</link>
		<comments>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/05/how-sticky-are-uk-newspaper-sites-62-8-per-cent-of-users-look-at-just-one-page-says-alexa/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Aug 2009 15:46:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Newspapers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Online Journalism]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[malcolm coles]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[newspaper traffic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[stickiness]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=12769</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[
This is a cross-post from Malcolm Coles’ personal website, and first appeared here. You can read other posts by Coles on the Journalism.co.uk Editors’ Blog at this link.
Visitors to UK newspaper sites look at an average of 2.5 pages a day, according to data from Alexa [click through from chart below]. But 62.8 per cent [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<div class="tweetmeme_button" style="float: right; margin-left: 10px;"><a href="http://api.tweetmeme.com/share?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F08%2F05%2Fhow-sticky-are-uk-newspaper-sites-62-8-per-cent-of-users-look-at-just-one-page-says-alexa%2F"><img src="http://api.tweetmeme.com/imagebutton.gif?url=http%3A%2F%2Fblogs.journalism.co.uk%2Feditors%2F2009%2F08%2F05%2Fhow-sticky-are-uk-newspaper-sites-62-8-per-cent-of-users-look-at-just-one-page-says-alexa%2F" height="61" width="51" /></a></div>
<p><em>This is a cross-post from <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/usa-traffic-uk-newspapers/" target="_blank">Malcolm Coles’ personal website</a>, and <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/newspaper-stickiness/" target="_blank">first appeared here</a>. You can read <a href="../tag/malcolm-coles" target="_blank">other posts by Coles on the Journalism.co.uk Editors’ Blog at this link</a>.</em></p>
<p>Visitors to UK newspaper sites look at an average of 2.5 pages a day, according to data from Alexa [click through from chart below]. But 62.8 per cent of users look at just one page.</p>
<p>In terms of daily page views per user, the Sun (4 pages), Guardian (3.1) and Telegraph (2.9) are above average.  Visitors to the Mail site look at just 2.4 pages a day &#8211; so while <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/june-2009-abce-analysis/">the Mail may have come top in the July ABCe figures</a>, maybe its <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/usa-traffic-uk-newspapers/">large number of overseas visitors</a> aren&#8217;t staying to look round the site.</p>
<table border="1">
<tbody>
<tr bgcolor="#ebebeb">
<td align="left"><strong>Newspaper</strong></td>
<td align="left"><strong>Daily page views<br />
per user</strong></td>
<td align="left"><strong>Bounce</strong><br />
<strong>rate (%) </strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/thesun.co.uk">The Sun</a></td>
<td align="left"><strong>4</strong></td>
<td align="left"><strong>48.5</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/guardian.co.uk">Guardian</a></td>
<td align="left"><strong>3.1</strong></td>
<td align="left"><strong>59.2</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/telegraph.co.uk">Telegraph</a></td>
<td align="left"><strong>2.9</strong></td>
<td align="left">65.2</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/dailymail.co.uk">Daily Mail</a></td>
<td align="left">2.4</td>
<td align="left"><strong>60.7</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/timesonline.co.uk">Times Online</a></td>
<td align="left">2.4</td>
<td align="left"><strong>59.7</strong></td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/independent.co.uk">Independent</a></td>
<td align="left">2.2</td>
<td align="left">70.4</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/ft.com">FT.com</a></td>
<td align="left">1.9</td>
<td align="left">66.8</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/mirror.co.uk">Mirror</a></td>
<td align="left">1.7</td>
<td align="left">67.5</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left"><a href="http://www.alexa.com/siteinfo/express.co.uk">Express</a></td>
<td align="left">1.7</td>
<td align="left">66.7</td>
</tr>
<tr>
<td align="left">Average</td>
<td align="left">2.5</td>
<td align="left">62.8</td>
</tr>
</tbody>
</table>
<ul>
<li><strong>Better than average figures are in bold.</strong></li>
<li>The bounce rate is the percentage of visits that consisted of just one page (so a low number is good).</li>
<li>These figures are 3-month averages. These change on a daily basis at Alexa &#8211; so they may have altered slightly by the time you check. Click the papers&#8217; names to see the current data.</li>
<li>The overall average at the bottom is a simple average &#8211; it has not been weighted by traffic.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>Page views vs bounce rate</strong><br />
The table is ranked by daily page views per user. The bounce rate is another measure of stickiness. It doesn&#8217;t exactly correlate with page views, as papers may have differing proportions of loyal, engaged users who visit lots of pages. The more pages that these users visit, the better the page view figure &#8211; but they won&#8217;t affect the bounce rate.</p>
<p>The Telegraph has a worse bounce rate than the sites near it in the table, perhaps because the <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/telegraph-trafficsocial-sites/">great success</a> with its <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/telegraph-tops-digg-list/">Digg tool</a> doesn&#8217;t always lead to multi-page visits?</p>
<p><strong>Using Alexa data</strong><br />
There are issues with using Alexa data like this <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/alexa-data-accuracy/">as it underrepresents UK users</a>, who may have differing usage patterns to other visitors. However, as it seems to underrepresent them more or less equally, the rankings should be ok, even if the absolute figures are all out by the same margin.</p>
<p>Oh, and all the papers are doing better than me! Visitors to <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/" target="_blank">my own blog</a> look at 1.5 pages a day and I have a 76 per cent bounce rate (which gets a bit worse when I publish things like <a href="http://www.malcolmcoles.co.uk/blog/tweet-about-boss/">Tweets people pray their bosses doesn&#8217;t see</a>).</p>
<p><strong>Similar Posts:</strong>
<ul class="similar-posts">
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/07/30/malcolm-coles-how-us-traffic-is-vital-for-uk-newspaper-sites/" rel="bookmark" title="July 30, 2009">Malcolm Coles: How US traffic is vital for UK newspaper sites</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/16/notw-website-sees-record-traffic-after-stephen-gately-report/" rel="bookmark" title="October 16, 2009">NOTW website sees record traffic after Stephen Gately report</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/29/herald-adds-web-stats-to-homepage/" rel="bookmark" title="May 29, 2008">Herald adds web stats to homepage</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/18/telegraphcouk-redesign-engagement-above-traffic/" rel="bookmark" title="July 18, 2008">Telegraph.co.uk redesign: engagement above traffic?</a></li>
<li><a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/28/guardian-most-popular-newspaper-website-in-uk-according-to-nielsen-online/" rel="bookmark" title="May 28, 2008">Guardian most popular newspaper website in UK, according to Nielsen Online</a></li>
</ul>
<p><!-- Similar Posts took 6.055 ms --></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/08/05/how-sticky-are-uk-newspaper-sites-62-8-per-cent-of-users-look-at-just-one-page-says-alexa/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
