<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian jobs site targeted by hackers</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/guardian-jobs-site-targeted-by-hackers/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/guardian-jobs-site-targeted-by-hackers/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Mar 2010 12:44:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jon Hickman: Why has the Guardian received little backlash over jobs board hack? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/10/26/guardian-jobs-site-targeted-by-hackers/comment-page-1/#comment-21456</link>
		<dc:creator>Jon Hickman: Why has the Guardian received little backlash over jobs board hack? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 09:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15328#comment-21456</guid>
		<description>[...] your minds back a few weeks: the Guardian UK jobs board, operated by Madgex, was hacked. The Guardian reported the incident in its print edition, and the comments beneath an initial blog [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] your minds back a few weeks: the Guardian UK jobs board, operated by Madgex, was hacked. The Guardian reported the incident in its print edition, and the comments beneath an initial blog [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
