<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitterers claim victory over loaded Daily Mail gypsy poll</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: I have little to add, but&#8230; &#171; BrownhillsBob&#39;s Brownhills Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-20788</link>
		<dc:creator>I have little to add, but&#8230; &#171; BrownhillsBob&#39;s Brownhills Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 23:17:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-20788</guid>
		<description>[...] in general has been giving the inky press a bloody nose for some weeks &#8211; think about campaigns to skew biased newspaper polls or the continual outing of outright lies by Badscience and the like. The whole Jan Moir/Stephen [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] in general has been giving the inky press a bloody nose for some weeks &#8211; think about campaigns to skew biased newspaper polls or the continual outing of outright lies by Badscience and the like. The whole Jan Moir/Stephen [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Twitter Gives Daily Mail A Stupid Answer To Its Stupid Question &#124; Gadget-reviewz</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-17613</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter Gives Daily Mail A Stupid Answer To Its Stupid Question &#124; Gadget-reviewz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Sep 2009 12:58:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-17613</guid>
		<description>[...] Via &#8211; Journalism.co.uk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Via &#8211; Journalism.co.uk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dave</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-16032</link>
		<dc:creator>Dave</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:36:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-16032</guid>
		<description>I think you&#039;ll find that reddit had a hand in that one as well.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you&#8217;ll find that reddit had a hand in that one as well.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Daily Mail to stop moderating comments, so how should they display comments?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-16026</link>
		<dc:creator>The Daily Mail to stop moderating comments, so how should they display comments?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Aug 2009 10:28:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-16026</guid>
		<description>[...] a track record of running polls as ridiculous as &#8220;Should the NHS allow gipsies to jump the queue?&#8221; The Daily Mail now run the risk of having a &#8220;left of centre&#8221; community of commenters [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] a track record of running polls as ridiculous as &#8220;Should the NHS allow gipsies to jump the queue?&#8221; The Daily Mail now run the risk of having a &#8220;left of centre&#8221; community of commenters [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Why Metatrend analysis?</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-15689</link>
		<dc:creator>Why Metatrend analysis?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 31 Jul 2009 16:23:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-15689</guid>
		<description>[...] tell you the truth &#8211; because of embarrassment, malice or any of a number of other reasons. Gaming surveys has even become popular as a form of subversive act. The best possible example of this problem are [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] tell you the truth &#8211; because of embarrassment, malice or any of a number of other reasons. Gaming surveys has even become popular as a form of subversive act. The best possible example of this problem are [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cyberman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-14684</link>
		<dc:creator>Cyberman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 13:48:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-14684</guid>
		<description>This would never have happened under the Tories.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This would never have happened under the Tories.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tales of the unexpected &#171; The Martin Cloake blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-14269</link>
		<dc:creator>Tales of the unexpected &#171; The Martin Cloake blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 01 Jul 2009 09:29:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-14269</guid>
		<description>[...] it is at operating within new media than everyone else. A few days before it had gleefully reported how the web community had scuppered a particularly obnoxious Daily Mail poll (and I&#8217;ll confess to enjoying that too), now it was on a receiving end of something [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] it is at operating within new media than everyone else. A few days before it had gleefully reported how the web community had scuppered a particularly obnoxious Daily Mail poll (and I&#8217;ll confess to enjoying that too), now it was on a receiving end of something [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daily Mail gypsy/NHS poll on The Now Show &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-14190</link>
		<dc:creator>Daily Mail gypsy/NHS poll on The Now Show &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 11:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-14190</guid>
		<description>[...] On Saturday June 20 Journalism.co.uk&#8217;s John Thompson reported: &#8220;The UK-based Mail Online was forced to shut down one of its online polls yesterday after a concerted campaign by Twitter users and, Journalism.co.uk can reveal, UK-based psychologists, nearly brought their servers to a halt with an overwhelming &#8216;yes&#8217; vote.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On Saturday June 20 Journalism.co.uk&#8217;s John Thompson reported: &#8220;The UK-based Mail Online was forced to shut down one of its online polls yesterday after a concerted campaign by Twitter users and, Journalism.co.uk can reveal, UK-based psychologists, nearly brought their servers to a halt with an overwhelming &#8216;yes&#8217; vote.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThePickards &#187; #LocalGovCamp (Session 4 &#8211; Crowdsourcing Public Policy)</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-14174</link>
		<dc:creator>ThePickards &#187; #LocalGovCamp (Session 4 &#8211; Crowdsourcing Public Policy)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Jun 2009 06:22:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-14174</guid>
		<description>[...] Journalism.co.uk [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Journalism.co.uk [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BNP and EHRC in acronym-wrestling competition &#171; project-sheffield</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/06/20/twitterers-claim-victory-over-loaded-daily-mail-gypsy-poll/comment-page-1/#comment-14014</link>
		<dc:creator>BNP and EHRC in acronym-wrestling competition &#171; project-sheffield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:51:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=11300#comment-14014</guid>
		<description>[...] down for jobs heaves into view and I’m reminded at this point of what happened to the Daily Mail’s poll about gipsies last [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] down for jobs heaves into view and I’m reminded at this point of what happened to the Daily Mail’s poll about gipsies last [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
