<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Twitter users play with Telegraph&#8217;s Twitterfall #Budget feature</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Labourlist Announces news of Derek Draper Departure #labourdoorstep &#124; The Wardman Wire</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12809</link>
		<dc:creator>Labourlist Announces news of Derek Draper Departure #labourdoorstep &#124; The Wardman Wire</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 16:09:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12809</guid>
		<description>[...] (Exhibit 1) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] (Exhibit 1) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full &#8230; &#187; malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12258</link>
		<dc:creator>That Shane Richmond / Charles Arthur Twackdown in full &#8230; &#187; malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 17:32:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12258</guid>
		<description>[...] Telegraph had to briefly remove its budget twitterfall box after people deliberately tweeted #budget plus  swear words to make [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Telegraph had to briefly remove its budget twitterfall box after people deliberately tweeted #budget plus  swear words to make [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The budget online: Liveblogging and Twitter dominate news orgs&#8217; coverage &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12252</link>
		<dc:creator>The budget online: Liveblogging and Twitter dominate news orgs&#8217; coverage &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 10:30:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12252</guid>
		<description>[...] has reinstated its Twitterfall – an embed aggregating all Twitter updates marked #budget. The feature had to be taken down earlier in the week, because of some mischief, but so far so good with the tweaked (filtered?) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] has reinstated its Twitterfall – an embed aggregating all Twitter updates marked #budget. The feature had to be taken down earlier in the week, because of some mischief, but so far so good with the tweaked (filtered?) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Footprints (21.04.09) &#124; Chris Deary</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12242</link>
		<dc:creator>Footprints (21.04.09) &#124; Chris Deary</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Apr 2009 00:07:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12242</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter users play with Telegraph&#8217;s Twitterfall #Budget feature [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter users play with Telegraph&rsquo;s Twitterfall #Budget feature [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12229</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:26:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12229</guid>
		<description>Although, thinking about it, they could just filter out tweets with rude words...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Although, thinking about it, they could just filter out tweets with rude words&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12224</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 23:03:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12224</guid>
		<description>@malcolm coles - indeed, not the first time Telegraph.co.uk has used Twitterfall (previously without incident, thankfully) - http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/27/telegraph-uses-twitterfall-for-live-football-pages/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@malcolm coles &#8211; indeed, not the first time Telegraph.co.uk has used Twitterfall (previously without incident, thankfully) &#8211; <a href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/27/telegraph-uses-twitterfall-for-live-football-pages/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/27/telegraph-uses-twitterfall-for-live-football-pages/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Malcolm Coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12220</link>
		<dc:creator>Malcolm Coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:46:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12220</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s hope the idiots don&#039;t spot twitterfall on other telegraph pages. Ruining an interesting experiment. Pah.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s hope the idiots don&#8217;t spot twitterfall on other telegraph pages. Ruining an interesting experiment. Pah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telegraph Twitterfall – where did it all go wrong? &#171;</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12219</link>
		<dc:creator>Telegraph Twitterfall – where did it all go wrong? &#171;</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:06:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12219</guid>
		<description>[...] the Telegraph&#8217;s website (Financial Times&#8217; Alphaville got in there in record time; journalism.co.uk and the Guardian), so I think they&#8217;ve won in this [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the Telegraph&#8217;s website (Financial Times&#8217; Alphaville got in there in record time; journalism.co.uk and the Guardian), so I think they&#8217;ve won in this [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pigsaw Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bookmarks for 20 Apr 2009</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12218</link>
		<dc:creator>Pigsaw Blog &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Bookmarks for 20 Apr 2009</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 18:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12218</guid>
		<description>[...] Twitter users play with Telegraph&#8217;s Twitterfall #Budget feature &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&amp;#39...&quot;Good old online altruism eh? Twitter users have seized upon the opportunity to get their uncensored Tweets published on the Telegraph&#8217;s Budget page.&quot; Oh dear. You try to do something a bit innovative and people just kick you in the teeth. (twitter telegraph ) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Twitter users play with Telegraph&rsquo;s Twitterfall #Budget feature | Journalism.co.uk Editors&amp;#39&#8230;&quot;Good old online altruism eh? Twitter users have seized upon the opportunity to get their uncensored Tweets published on the Telegraph&rsquo;s Budget page.&quot; Oh dear. You try to do something a bit innovative and people just kick you in the teeth. (twitter telegraph ) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt_Parsons</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/04/20/twitter-users-play-with-telegraphs-twitterfall-budget-feature/comment-page-1/#comment-12213</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt_Parsons</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Apr 2009 15:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=9675#comment-12213</guid>
		<description>I wonder who started off with all the abuse? Either way - the Telegraph website wins with all the hits, and with all the exposure. So not so bad after all...
Another Twitterfall screengrab here: http://twitpic.com/3np80</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wonder who started off with all the abuse? Either way &#8211; the Telegraph website wins with all the hits, and with all the exposure. So not so bad after all&#8230;<br />
Another Twitterfall screengrab here: <a href="http://twitpic.com/3np80" rel="nofollow">http://twitpic.com/3np80</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
