<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Clay Shirky: The old model&#8217;s broken &#8211; don&#8217;t try to replace it</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/16/clay-shirky-the-old-models-broken-dont-try-to-replace/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/16/clay-shirky-the-old-models-broken-dont-try-to-replace/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Adrian Monck: A response to Clay Shirky on newspaper paywalls &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/03/16/clay-shirky-the-old-models-broken-dont-try-to-replace/comment-page-1/#comment-11284</link>
		<dc:creator>Adrian Monck: A response to Clay Shirky on newspaper paywalls &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Mar 2009 08:56:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=8948#comment-11284</guid>
		<description>[...] Monck argues against Clay Shirky&#8217;s post earlier this week on the broken business model of newspapers, in particular the success of paywalls for financial [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Monck argues against Clay Shirky&#8217;s post earlier this week on the broken business model of newspapers, in particular the success of paywalls for financial [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
