<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Poynter Online: How to &#8216;get off the free-content treadmill&#8217;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/10/poynter-online-how-to-get-off-the-free-content-treadmill/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/10/poynter-online-how-to-get-off-the-free-content-treadmill/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 09:10:28 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Wanted: Cash for Content : Spada Professional Services PR Firm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/10/poynter-online-how-to-get-off-the-free-content-treadmill/comment-page-1/#comment-10017</link>
		<dc:creator>Wanted: Cash for Content : Spada Professional Services PR Firm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2009 09:33:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=7896#comment-10017</guid>
		<description>[...] simple, but with one calculation indicating that with 20 million monthly unique visitors, the New York Times could make $240 million [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] simple, but with one calculation indicating that with 20 million monthly unique visitors, the New York Times could make $240 million [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lomax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/02/10/poynter-online-how-to-get-off-the-free-content-treadmill/comment-page-1/#comment-10002</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lomax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:03:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=7896#comment-10002</guid>
		<description>And if I had a dollar everytime somebody thought they could do micropayments for content...

Huge issues with this idea:
1. The site gets 20 million unique users a month, but half of those probably visit for less than a minute depending on their bounce rates and dwell times. It&#039;s pretty hard to get a buck off somebody for 10 seconds&#039; attention.

2. The cheapest thing itunes sells is $1. Nobody has properly cracked micropayments. 50c of every debit card transaction goes to the bank, so charging 5 or 10c per transaction means you&#039;re making a loss. The only option is to bump up the average order value, which means charging for a month minimum, and losing most impulse buys.

3. You wouldn&#039;t have 20m uniques for long if you paywall the content. In a world where people hit back and try the next link in Google just because of slow loading, it&#039;s tough. The registration/purchase process alone without money coming into it would cause the vast majority to drop out.

Bare in mind that the average converstion rate for e-commerce is something like 1% (of visitors who buy something), and that&#039;s on sites you visit simply to buy something.

So much of the content won&#039;t be unique. most of it will be broken elsewhere. so you&#039;re left with a &#039;fat head&#039; and no long tail.

Perhaps we have to live with journalism being a &#039;loss leader&#039;, as milk is to supermarkets. Draw the audience and maybe actually sell them something appropriate - retailing and merchandising. The problem is most media outlets haven&#039;t got a clue about retailing. Advertising revenue is easier...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And if I had a dollar everytime somebody thought they could do micropayments for content&#8230;</p>
<p>Huge issues with this idea:<br />
1. The site gets 20 million unique users a month, but half of those probably visit for less than a minute depending on their bounce rates and dwell times. It&#8217;s pretty hard to get a buck off somebody for 10 seconds&#8217; attention.</p>
<p>2. The cheapest thing itunes sells is $1. Nobody has properly cracked micropayments. 50c of every debit card transaction goes to the bank, so charging 5 or 10c per transaction means you&#8217;re making a loss. The only option is to bump up the average order value, which means charging for a month minimum, and losing most impulse buys.</p>
<p>3. You wouldn&#8217;t have 20m uniques for long if you paywall the content. In a world where people hit back and try the next link in Google just because of slow loading, it&#8217;s tough. The registration/purchase process alone without money coming into it would cause the vast majority to drop out.</p>
<p>Bare in mind that the average converstion rate for e-commerce is something like 1% (of visitors who buy something), and that&#8217;s on sites you visit simply to buy something.</p>
<p>So much of the content won&#8217;t be unique. most of it will be broken elsewhere. so you&#8217;re left with a &#8216;fat head&#8217; and no long tail.</p>
<p>Perhaps we have to live with journalism being a &#8216;loss leader&#8217;, as milk is to supermarkets. Draw the audience and maybe actually sell them something appropriate &#8211; retailing and merchandising. The problem is most media outlets haven&#8217;t got a clue about retailing. Advertising revenue is easier&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
