<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ten things every journalist should know in 2009</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Cindy Kim</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-2/#comment-13993</link>
		<dc:creator>Cindy Kim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 03:08:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-13993</guid>
		<description>The introduction of web 2.0 has changed the face of journalism, not to mention the impact and pressures of the economy. The article is great in the sense that it highlights how journalists need to adapt to the changing landscape - but it&#039;s critical - when they&#039;re joining the conversation, be sure to engage. I&#039;ve noticed with Twitter, they set it up and continue to use Twitter as a platform to push their messages out. Bad mistake. You will quickly lose your followers and be un-interesting if all you&#039;re doing is pushing out your latest article, news program, etc. The whole point is to participate and engage with your readers. This is a great way to build relationships and loyalty. Another think and I think @deljones of USA Today does a great job is actively poll your users and integrate that into your piece. A lot of times I see journalists jumping on the latest bandwagon and just reiterating things we already know. Take the next step (be innovative) and bring something vastly different that takes us to a new level of learning. 

Cindy Kim</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The introduction of web 2.0 has changed the face of journalism, not to mention the impact and pressures of the economy. The article is great in the sense that it highlights how journalists need to adapt to the changing landscape &#8211; but it&#8217;s critical &#8211; when they&#8217;re joining the conversation, be sure to engage. I&#8217;ve noticed with Twitter, they set it up and continue to use Twitter as a platform to push their messages out. Bad mistake. You will quickly lose your followers and be un-interesting if all you&#8217;re doing is pushing out your latest article, news program, etc. The whole point is to participate and engage with your readers. This is a great way to build relationships and loyalty. Another think and I think @deljones of USA Today does a great job is actively poll your users and integrate that into your piece. A lot of times I see journalists jumping on the latest bandwagon and just reiterating things we already know. Take the next step (be innovative) and bring something vastly different that takes us to a new level of learning. </p>
<p>Cindy Kim</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cosas que todo periodista debería de tener en cuenta en estos tiempos &#124; Juan Ortega &#124; mi vida 2.0 a través de tags</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-13880</link>
		<dc:creator>Cosas que todo periodista debería de tener en cuenta en estos tiempos &#124; Juan Ortega &#124; mi vida 2.0 a través de tags</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 04:19:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-13880</guid>
		<description>[...] Para no aburrirlos, la lista completa (nota en inglés) la podes encontrar a través de este enlace. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Para no aburrirlos, la lista completa (nota en inglés) la podes encontrar a través de este enlace. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: WHEN MUSICIANS USE SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES. &#171; No Ouais</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-13835</link>
		<dc:creator>WHEN MUSICIANS USE SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES. &#171; No Ouais</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 13:43:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-13835</guid>
		<description>[...] you think, doesn&#8217;t it? Journalism.co.uk recently put Twitter at the top of their list of Things What Journalizers Need To Be Good With in 2009 because of the way in which it allows you to enter into a discussion with your readers. Similarly, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you think, doesn&#8217;t it? Journalism.co.uk recently put Twitter at the top of their list of Things What Journalizers Need To Be Good With in 2009 because of the way in which it allows you to enter into a discussion with your readers. Similarly, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ten things every journalist should know. Number 1 - Twitter!!!! &#171; Shell&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12841</link>
		<dc:creator>Ten things every journalist should know. Number 1 - Twitter!!!! &#171; Shell&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 07 May 2009 19:57:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-12841</guid>
		<description>[...] you were to think off the top of your head the top ten things every journalist should know I think they would be very different from the ten that journalism.co.uk are offering. I guess it is [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] you were to think off the top of your head the top ten things every journalist should know I think they would be very different from the ten that journalism.co.uk are offering. I guess it is [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pat</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12563</link>
		<dc:creator>pat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 01 May 2009 02:35:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-12563</guid>
		<description>Get over twitter, it&#039;s a narcissistic, useless &quot;social&quot; application that only has a 40% retention rate for users anyway. My god, apparently all it takes to be a &quot;journalist&quot; is to be able to open a blog and talk about how important twitter is...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Get over twitter, it&#8217;s a narcissistic, useless &#8220;social&#8221; application that only has a 40% retention rate for users anyway. My god, apparently all it takes to be a &#8220;journalist&#8221; is to be able to open a blog and talk about how important twitter is&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Top 10 Skills and Qualities of the Modern Journalist &#171; Aid and Development</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12269</link>
		<dc:creator>The Top 10 Skills and Qualities of the Modern Journalist &#171; Aid and Development</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 23 Apr 2009 04:48:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-12269</guid>
		<description>[...] John Thompson writes, there is no longer any excuse for not having these skills: the technology is available [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] John Thompson writes, there is no longer any excuse for not having these skills: the technology is available [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: A helping hand&#8230; &#171; Leah.Murray&#8217;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-12160</link>
		<dc:creator>A helping hand&#8230; &#171; Leah.Murray&#8217;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:47:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-12160</guid>
		<description>[...] guide, &#8220;Ten things every journalist should know&#8221; is a show and tell of new media resources and would work well for those starting out in the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] guide, &#8220;Ten things every journalist should know&#8221; is a show and tell of new media resources and would work well for those starting out in the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Klipp håret - og jobben er din &#171; Mors beste barn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-11580</link>
		<dc:creator>Klipp håret - og jobben er din &#171; Mors beste barn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 13:45:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-11580</guid>
		<description>[...] du usikker på hva som kreves av dagens journalister, ta en titt på denne bloggartikkelen: &#8220;Ten things every journalist should know in 2009&#8243;, og lær deg innholdet utenat. Da burde du være nogenlunde [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] du usikker på hva som kreves av dagens journalister, ta en titt på denne bloggartikkelen: &#8220;Ten things every journalist should know in 2009&#8243;, og lær deg innholdet utenat. Da burde du være nogenlunde [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dog sniffs dog, gently &#171; Paperhouse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-11524</link>
		<dc:creator>Dog sniffs dog, gently &#171; Paperhouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:48:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-11524</guid>
		<description>[...] informal watchdog. And it&#8217;s beginning to be recognised that the papers can&#8217;t get away with this sort of thing forever: an active community of critical readers online means that [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] informal watchdog. And it&#8217;s beginning to be recognised that the papers can&#8217;t get away with this sort of thing forever: an active community of critical readers online means that [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jazzy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2009/01/13/ten-things-every-journalist-should-know-in-2009/comment-page-1/#comment-10887</link>
		<dc:creator>Jazzy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Mar 2009 03:25:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6747#comment-10887</guid>
		<description>Agreed.  While its sad that the art form is dying, at least there is a small glimmer of hope in some of these suggestions.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agreed.  While its sad that the art form is dying, at least there is a small glimmer of hope in some of these suggestions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
