<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Does a series of Tweets really qualify as &#8216;citizen journalism&#8217;?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/23/does-a-series-of-tweets-really-qualify-as-citizen-journalism/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/23/does-a-series-of-tweets-really-qualify-as-citizen-journalism/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Twitter and the citizen journalism argument (again) &#171; Scribbles in my Notebook</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/23/does-a-series-of-tweets-really-qualify-as-citizen-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-8816</link>
		<dc:creator>Twitter and the citizen journalism argument (again) &#171; Scribbles in my Notebook</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 22:18:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6285#comment-8816</guid>
		<description>[...] Journalism.co.uk asks if those tweets should be considered citizen journalism or just glorified instant messages. Was he [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Journalism.co.uk asks if those tweets should be considered citizen journalism or just glorified instant messages. Was he [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Malthouse</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/12/23/does-a-series-of-tweets-really-qualify-as-citizen-journalism/comment-page-1/#comment-8797</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Malthouse</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Dec 2008 12:51:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=6285#comment-8797</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s difficult to decide a line between a witness who publishes an account of an event publicly and a journalist. Surely it is journalism in some way, but with no attempt to analyze the situation in an objective and truthful way. It&#039;s likely that tweets and blog posts may be spawned from rumour (obviously not in the case of the plane crash) so this can&#039;t be classed as journalism. That&#039;s as much journalism as a couple of elderly ladies gossiping on a park bench. 
Citizen journalism can however get somewhere where journalists might not be able to. This makes them an invaluable source to build up on a news story, rather than just treating the eye-witness account as a story. In the end it&#039;s up to professional journalists to take a citizen story and follow it up to make it objective.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s difficult to decide a line between a witness who publishes an account of an event publicly and a journalist. Surely it is journalism in some way, but with no attempt to analyze the situation in an objective and truthful way. It&#8217;s likely that tweets and blog posts may be spawned from rumour (obviously not in the case of the plane crash) so this can&#8217;t be classed as journalism. That&#8217;s as much journalism as a couple of elderly ladies gossiping on a park bench.<br />
Citizen journalism can however get somewhere where journalists might not be able to. This makes them an invaluable source to build up on a news story, rather than just treating the eye-witness account as a story. In the end it&#8217;s up to professional journalists to take a citizen story and follow it up to make it objective.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
