<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BNP members list leak gathers pace online &#8211; to link or not to link?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:28:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Guardian Politics: Second BNP membership leak &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-20735</link>
		<dc:creator>Guardian Politics: Second BNP membership leak &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 07:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-20735</guid>
		<description>[...] The data leak would be the second in a year for the party after details of members were released online last November, raising debate about news organisations handling of the data and whether such documents should be li.... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] The data leak would be the second in a year for the party after details of members were released online last November, raising debate about news organisations handling of the data and whether such documents should be li&#8230;. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Reuters: Former BNP man fined for leaking members list &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-17275</link>
		<dc:creator>Reuters: Former BNP man fined for leaking members list &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 08:12:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-17275</guid>
		<description>[...] BNP members list leak gathers pace online &#8211; to link or not to link? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BNP members list leak gathers pace online &#8211; to link or not to link? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-8944</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 11:17:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-8944</guid>
		<description>doesnt bother me,just shows how violent the other parties are. the bnp are NOT going around beating or killing other party members,or even being rude to them for that matter. they dont promote violence or encourage it in any way. it is the crazed other party members and followers that are wanting to harm or even kill bnp members for thier beliefs. we are not violent towards anyone,im pretty sure there is a word for people that &quot;bully&quot; a minority of people.you havent got to explain yourself to me,better get your story straight for jesus though.if the bnp was majority (which isnt too far away) are you all going to leave the country because its too british? no,your not! but you will once again enjoy our british traditions,to celebrate st georges day,and christmas (the birth of christ,for those who have forgotten).everyone is always complaining the country is overcrowded,little tip....if your not going to join the fight to solve this problem then please juat shut up,smile about it instead if you like,because the people that are trying to sort it are being called racist.next time a friend says how crowded the country is,please call them racist and try to ruin thier life as much as you can. thats what our &quot;perfect government&quot; followers are doing to bnp members for believing what they believe.would you cause problems for people that believe we are alone in the universe? or not? this is simply a belief,not a racist or demonic following.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>doesnt bother me,just shows how violent the other parties are. the bnp are NOT going around beating or killing other party members,or even being rude to them for that matter. they dont promote violence or encourage it in any way. it is the crazed other party members and followers that are wanting to harm or even kill bnp members for thier beliefs. we are not violent towards anyone,im pretty sure there is a word for people that &#8220;bully&#8221; a minority of people.you havent got to explain yourself to me,better get your story straight for jesus though.if the bnp was majority (which isnt too far away) are you all going to leave the country because its too british? no,your not! but you will once again enjoy our british traditions,to celebrate st georges day,and christmas (the birth of christ,for those who have forgotten).everyone is always complaining the country is overcrowded,little tip&#8230;.if your not going to join the fight to solve this problem then please juat shut up,smile about it instead if you like,because the people that are trying to sort it are being called racist.next time a friend says how crowded the country is,please call them racist and try to ruin thier life as much as you can. thats what our &#8220;perfect government&#8221; followers are doing to bnp members for believing what they believe.would you cause problems for people that believe we are alone in the universe? or not? this is simply a belief,not a racist or demonic following.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Guido to introduce community rating system to blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-8710</link>
		<dc:creator>Guido to introduce community rating system to blog &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Dec 2008 17:22:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-8710</guid>
		<description>[...] regards to the BNP list (which had leaked that week): &#8220;I did allow it. oh terrible, terrible, terrible. Oh [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] regards to the BNP list (which had leaked that week): &#8220;I did allow it. oh terrible, terrible, terrible. Oh [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pete</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-8386</link>
		<dc:creator>pete</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Dec 2008 13:22:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-8386</guid>
		<description>bravo...i think you should name all labour followers as well.so the troops familys can see exactley who is backing labour sending thier babys to fight wars that has no effect on us whatsoever.also i can understand why you would be pleased that our country spends £60m a year to call ourselves &quot;euro&quot; . this is why everything is so highly priced,not this reason alone but many others. so please, hear both sides before you go thinking your almighty and give judging a go.look at yourself,would the country be better off if everyone was like you?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>bravo&#8230;i think you should name all labour followers as well.so the troops familys can see exactley who is backing labour sending thier babys to fight wars that has no effect on us whatsoever.also i can understand why you would be pleased that our country spends £60m a year to call ourselves &#8220;euro&#8221; . this is why everything is so highly priced,not this reason alone but many others. so please, hear both sides before you go thinking your almighty and give judging a go.look at yourself,would the country be better off if everyone was like you?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jason Brown</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7912</link>
		<dc:creator>Jason Brown</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 12:02:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-7912</guid>
		<description>For me linking to the BNP members list was a no brainer, just as I would have linked to a list of Labour party members, Tories or LibDems. This information should be in the public domain and I hope that by linking to it I can foster a debate around membership of this political party and its members role in the county. Simply put I would weant to know if my doctor, sisters teachers or the local police officer is a member of a rascist party.

I did however take the decicion not to link to the original blog post, but instead to the wikileaks entry.

One last thing I have always stood by the journalism mantra of 2publish and be damed&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For me linking to the BNP members list was a no brainer, just as I would have linked to a list of Labour party members, Tories or LibDems. This information should be in the public domain and I hope that by linking to it I can foster a debate around membership of this political party and its members role in the county. Simply put I would weant to know if my doctor, sisters teachers or the local police officer is a member of a rascist party.</p>
<p>I did however take the decicion not to link to the original blog post, but instead to the wikileaks entry.</p>
<p>One last thing I have always stood by the journalism mantra of 2publish and be damed&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin Wright.tv &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Following the Story: BNP</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7885</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin Wright.tv &#187; Blog Archive &#187; Following the Story: BNP</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 19:16:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-7885</guid>
		<description>[...] BNP members list leak gathers pace online - to link or not to link? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&amp;#8217... [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BNP members list leak gathers pace online &#8211; to link or not to link? | Journalism.co.uk Editors&amp;#8217&#8230; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Adam</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7883</link>
		<dc:creator>Adam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 18:38:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-7883</guid>
		<description>I dont see why the like shouldn&#039;t be posted. If the members are as proud of themselves as they seem in the thousands of blogs they visit ever other week, why hide it in real life?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I dont see why the like shouldn&#8217;t be posted. If the members are as proud of themselves as they seem in the thousands of blogs they visit ever other week, why hide it in real life?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7878</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 15:07:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-7878</guid>
		<description>Hi - have decided not to publish comments that offer direct links to the list as did not intend this post to link directly to it. (sorry @enigmax)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi &#8211; have decided not to publish comments that offer direct links to the list as did not intend this post to link directly to it. (sorry @enigmax)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Journalism.co.uk Editors&#8217; Blog: BNP members list leak gathers pace online - to link or not to link? &#124; CyberLaw Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/11/19/bnp-members-list-leak-gathers-pace-online-to-link-or-not-to-link/comment-page-1/#comment-7875</link>
		<dc:creator>Journalism.co.uk Editors&#8217; Blog: BNP members list leak gathers pace online - to link or not to link? &#124; CyberLaw Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Nov 2008 14:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=5284#comment-7875</guid>
		<description>[...] BNP members list leak gathers pace online - to link or not to link? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&amp;#8217...: &#8220;BNP members list leak gathers pace online - to link or not to link? November 19th, 2008 Posted by Laura Oliver in Legal, Online Journalism, Press freedom and ethics [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] BNP members list leak gathers pace online &#8211; to link or not to link? | Journalism.co.uk Editors&amp;#8217&#8230;: &#8220;BNP members list leak gathers pace online &#8211; to link or not to link? November 19th, 2008 Posted by Laura Oliver in Legal, Online Journalism, Press freedom and ethics [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
