<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian blogs complete move to new technology platform</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6636</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:54:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2751#comment-6636</guid>
		<description>No - it&#039;s just inconsistent from blog to blog, post by post.  I don&#039;t think it&#039;s a function of the changeover, just the different styles of each blog.  See:

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/usa/
http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/sport/

for example.  Perhaps some of the already relaunched blogs were more like Sport and USA?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No &#8211; it&#8217;s just inconsistent from blog to blog, post by post.  I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s a function of the changeover, just the different styles of each blog.  See:</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/usa/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/usa/</a><br />
<a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/sport/" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/sport/</a></p>
<p>for example.  Perhaps some of the already relaunched blogs were more like Sport and USA?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emily Bell</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6635</link>
		<dc:creator>Emily Bell</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:51:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2751#comment-6635</guid>
		<description>Hi there - Ashley is wrong - there has always been the &#039;&#039;read more&#039; approach. And also wrong that it signals an end to a &#039;traditional blogging approach&#039; , whatever that might be. The reason we have migrated our blogs is , as explained, that it makes posts appear in our archive search , on keyword pages, on author pages etc etc. 

We also have the issue with external platforms of adequate scale  for their growth in popularity. But all feedback is welcome.

Emily Bell
director digital content
guardian news and media</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi there &#8211; Ashley is wrong &#8211; there has always been the &#8221;read more&#8217; approach. And also wrong that it signals an end to a &#8216;traditional blogging approach&#8217; , whatever that might be. The reason we have migrated our blogs is , as explained, that it makes posts appear in our archive search , on keyword pages, on author pages etc etc. </p>
<p>We also have the issue with external platforms of adequate scale  for their growth in popularity. But all feedback is welcome.</p>
<p>Emily Bell<br />
director digital content<br />
guardian news and media</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6634</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:22:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2751#comment-6634</guid>
		<description>Am I clicking on something different then as I get the posts in full (on the old design)? 

Looking at OrganGrinder and PDA as examples - I&#039;ve clicked on the link to them from the MediaGuardian navigation bar and their links in the blogs section.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Am I clicking on something different then as I get the posts in full (on the old design)? </p>
<p>Looking at OrganGrinder and PDA as examples &#8211; I&#8217;ve clicked on the link to them from the MediaGuardian navigation bar and their links in the blogs section.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jenna</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6633</link>
		<dc:creator>Jenna</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:12:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2751#comment-6633</guid>
		<description>Um... Ashley Norris is wrong. They&#039;ve always been structured with the first part of the story and then a &quot;read more&quot;, even on Movable Type.

I&#039;ve grabbed an image and put it here:
&lt;a href=&quot;http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sampleguardianbt8.jpg&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Guardian Blogs&lt;/a&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um&#8230; Ashley Norris is wrong. They&#8217;ve always been structured with the first part of the story and then a &#8220;read more&#8221;, even on Movable Type.</p>
<p>I&#8217;ve grabbed an image and put it here:<br />
<a href="http://img187.imageshack.us/my.php?image=sampleguardianbt8.jpg" rel="nofollow">Guardian Blogs</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6632</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 16:00:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2751#comment-6632</guid>
		<description>@pm If you compare the new design e.g. on the news blog - http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog -to the existing design when you view the front page of OrganGrinder there is quite a big difference to my eye. Lots of &#039;continue reading&#039; links on the new design.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@pm If you compare the new design e.g. on the news blog &#8211; <a href="http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog" rel="nofollow">http://www.guardian.co.uk/news/blog</a> -to the existing design when you view the front page of OrganGrinder there is quite a big difference to my eye. Lots of &#8216;continue reading&#8217; links on the new design.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: pm</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/09/guardian-blogs-complete-move-to-new-technology-platform/comment-page-1/#comment-6631</link>
		<dc:creator>pm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Sep 2008 15:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2751#comment-6631</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m sure that&#039;s always been the case?

Whenever I go to the front page of a blog like OrganGrinder it shows me an extract only.. otherwise it&#039;d be clogged with 3,000-word-long live blog articles about Big Brother...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m sure that&#8217;s always been the case?</p>
<p>Whenever I go to the front page of a blog like OrganGrinder it shows me an extract only.. otherwise it&#8217;d be clogged with 3,000-word-long live blog articles about Big Brother&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
