<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Strictly professional &#8211; what&#8217;s public and what&#8217;s private for journalists on Twitter?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/02/strictly-professional-whats-public-and-whats-private-for-journalists-on-twitter/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/02/strictly-professional-whats-public-and-whats-private-for-journalists-on-twitter/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: UK news regulation stands in the way of newsroom convergence &#124; BeatBlogging.Org</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/02/strictly-professional-whats-public-and-whats-private-for-journalists-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-13051</link>
		<dc:creator>UK news regulation stands in the way of newsroom convergence &#124; BeatBlogging.Org</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 16:56:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2492#comment-13051</guid>
		<description>[...] he sent out an accidental direct message as a public tweet. And misunderstandings can arise &#8212; just ask BBC technology correspondent, Rory Cellan-Jones. Worse, inaccuracies can occur, when a re-tweet becomes an endorsement of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] he sent out an accidental direct message as a public tweet. And misunderstandings can arise &#8212; just ask BBC technology correspondent, Rory Cellan-Jones. Worse, inaccuracies can occur, when a re-tweet becomes an endorsement of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Judith Townend</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/02/strictly-professional-whats-public-and-whats-private-for-journalists-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6540</link>
		<dc:creator>Judith Townend</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 11:27:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2492#comment-6540</guid>
		<description>Over at http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/09/02/the-day-i-murdered-british-journalism/ we&#039;ve been accused of losing our sense of humour. The intention of the post was to flag up Cellan-Jones&#039; concerns about quoting from Twitter, rather than directly criticising James Graham&#039;s blog post. 

As James&#039; later comment identified, blog posts are very much subject to interpretation by each reader, and his use of the Twitter quote might have got Rory Cellan-Jones&#039; goat more than was intended. Likewise, Cellan-Jones&#039; BBC post provoked Graham on his blog, and so it goes on. 

Yes, I certainly can be bothered. Journalists are fascinated to see where social media takes and develops reporting, and how it redefines the remits of journalism, especially when journalists start to use different voices in a public manner. All we&#039;re doing at Journalism.co.uk is documenting that, and hoping to stimulate further useful debate...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Over at <a href="http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/09/02/the-day-i-murdered-british-journalism/" rel="nofollow">http://www.theliberati.net/quaequamblog/2008/09/02/the-day-i-murdered-british-journalism/</a> we&#8217;ve been accused of losing our sense of humour. The intention of the post was to flag up Cellan-Jones&#8217; concerns about quoting from Twitter, rather than directly criticising James Graham&#8217;s blog post. </p>
<p>As James&#8217; later comment identified, blog posts are very much subject to interpretation by each reader, and his use of the Twitter quote might have got Rory Cellan-Jones&#8217; goat more than was intended. Likewise, Cellan-Jones&#8217; BBC post provoked Graham on his blog, and so it goes on. </p>
<p>Yes, I certainly can be bothered. Journalists are fascinated to see where social media takes and develops reporting, and how it redefines the remits of journalism, especially when journalists start to use different voices in a public manner. All we&#8217;re doing at Journalism.co.uk is documenting that, and hoping to stimulate further useful debate&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Laura Oliver</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/02/strictly-professional-whats-public-and-whats-private-for-journalists-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6539</link>
		<dc:creator>Laura Oliver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 09:29:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2492#comment-6539</guid>
		<description>@Matt Wardman - does the individual tweet have a permalink?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>@Matt Wardman &#8211; does the individual tweet have a permalink?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matt Wardman</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/02/strictly-professional-whats-public-and-whats-private-for-journalists-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6534</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt Wardman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Sep 2008 00:18:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2492#comment-6534</guid>
		<description>Equally important question: does it have a permalink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Equally important question: does it have a permalink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Quaequam Blog! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The day I murdered British journalism</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/09/02/strictly-professional-whats-public-and-whats-private-for-journalists-on-twitter/comment-page-1/#comment-6525</link>
		<dc:creator>Quaequam Blog! &#187; Blog Archive &#187; The day I murdered British journalism</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Sep 2008 13:06:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=2492#comment-6525</guid>
		<description>[...] have a sense of humour. First a public rebuke on the BBC for being &#8220;pompous&#8221; now journalism.co.uk doesn&#8217;t see the funny side. Any minute now, I&#8217;m expecting the National Union of [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] have a sense of humour. First a public rebuke on the BBC for being &#8220;pompous&#8221; now journalism.co.uk doesn&#8217;t see the funny side. Any minute now, I&#8217;m expecting the National Union of [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
