<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mirror.co.uk joins competitors with homepage redesign</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/23/mirrorcouk-joins-competitors-with-homepage-redesign/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/23/mirrorcouk-joins-competitors-with-homepage-redesign/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 16:28:58 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.5</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Matt @ PRBristol</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/23/mirrorcouk-joins-competitors-with-homepage-redesign/comment-page-1/#comment-6066</link>
		<dc:creator>Matt @ PRBristol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Jul 2008 14:05:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=1657#comment-6066</guid>
		<description>Hi, 

Seems very busy indeed above the page, tend to get lost on where to novigate for content. 

Good interactive features (video) and rather unsurprisingly good photography. 

The RSS feed section is only under a small link top right perhaps needs an RSS feed logo to stand out more. The reason being that the number of RSS feeds in categories is great in order to pick and chose content. 

The site is about a six for me due to the cluttered feel. The best media site for me is the www.bbc.co.uk website as it is clear to navigate and can be tailored for conent (so feels a lot less cluttered).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, </p>
<p>Seems very busy indeed above the page, tend to get lost on where to novigate for content. </p>
<p>Good interactive features (video) and rather unsurprisingly good photography. </p>
<p>The RSS feed section is only under a small link top right perhaps needs an RSS feed logo to stand out more. The reason being that the number of RSS feeds in categories is great in order to pick and chose content. </p>
<p>The site is about a six for me due to the cluttered feel. The best media site for me is the <a href="http://www.bbc.co.uk" rel="nofollow">http://www.bbc.co.uk</a> website as it is clear to navigate and can be tailored for conent (so feels a lot less cluttered).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
