<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Online Journalism Scandinavia: Mecom’s Danish arm may ditch costly CMS for Drupal</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/11/online-journalism-scandinavia-mecom%e2%80%99s-danish-arm-may-ditch-costly-cms-for-drupal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/11/online-journalism-scandinavia-mecom%e2%80%99s-danish-arm-may-ditch-costly-cms-for-drupal/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kristine Lowe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/11/online-journalism-scandinavia-mecom%e2%80%99s-danish-arm-may-ditch-costly-cms-for-drupal/comment-page-1/#comment-7351</link>
		<dc:creator>Kristine Lowe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 15:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=1497#comment-7351</guid>
		<description>JM Drupal: what you effectively are saying is that you disagree with Henning Sund&#039;s arguments in this piece. The article only reports a development, Berlingske&#039;s CMS choice, which Sund comments on. As such, the article couldn&#039;t be incorrect in itself unless I included wrong facts or claimed to be giving you the whole and unvarnished truth about Drupal (which I don&#039;t). I thought it was valuable in this context to hear why some newspaper folks don&#039;t see Drupal as an option. 

As I also work for a site which runs on Drupal, www.journalisten.no , I don&#039;t necessarily share Sund&#039;s views, but I thought it was interesting to hear the views of someone who is both working on digital development in the same company and knows a lot about digital development and newspapers.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JM Drupal: what you effectively are saying is that you disagree with Henning Sund&#8217;s arguments in this piece. The article only reports a development, Berlingske&#8217;s CMS choice, which Sund comments on. As such, the article couldn&#8217;t be incorrect in itself unless I included wrong facts or claimed to be giving you the whole and unvarnished truth about Drupal (which I don&#8217;t). I thought it was valuable in this context to hear why some newspaper folks don&#8217;t see Drupal as an option. </p>
<p>As I also work for a site which runs on Drupal, <a href="http://www.journalisten.no" rel="nofollow">http://www.journalisten.no</a> , I don&#8217;t necessarily share Sund&#8217;s views, but I thought it was interesting to hear the views of someone who is both working on digital development in the same company and knows a lot about digital development and newspapers.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/11/online-journalism-scandinavia-mecom%e2%80%99s-danish-arm-may-ditch-costly-cms-for-drupal/comment-page-1/#comment-7343</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 27 Oct 2008 10:25:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=1497#comment-7343</guid>
		<description>JM Drupal is absolutely spot on correct here. The misguided &quot;security risk&quot; with open source software is regularly banded about and shows a fundamental lack of understanding of what open source is all about.

An open source project, be it Apache, Drupal, MySQL, Linux, whatever, has a team of developers in the tens of thousands, compared with a few hundred for even the biggest closed source &quot;Black Box&quot; project. As a result, more usage, more eyeballs, FASTER security fixes, coupled with transparent code that you are free to modify if you don&#039;t like something.

A growing number of world governments, who are arguably the most risk-aversed software purchasers of all, are moving to open source software because it offers far higher security (and, most importantly, the ability to review the code and judge for yourself). They are shunning the big black box software producers. The concept that somehow open source is a security risk belongs with the dinosaurs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>JM Drupal is absolutely spot on correct here. The misguided &#8220;security risk&#8221; with open source software is regularly banded about and shows a fundamental lack of understanding of what open source is all about.</p>
<p>An open source project, be it Apache, Drupal, MySQL, Linux, whatever, has a team of developers in the tens of thousands, compared with a few hundred for even the biggest closed source &#8220;Black Box&#8221; project. As a result, more usage, more eyeballs, FASTER security fixes, coupled with transparent code that you are free to modify if you don&#8217;t like something.</p>
<p>A growing number of world governments, who are arguably the most risk-aversed software purchasers of all, are moving to open source software because it offers far higher security (and, most importantly, the ability to review the code and judge for yourself). They are shunning the big black box software producers. The concept that somehow open source is a security risk belongs with the dinosaurs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JM Drupal</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/07/11/online-journalism-scandinavia-mecom%e2%80%99s-danish-arm-may-ditch-costly-cms-for-drupal/comment-page-1/#comment-5871</link>
		<dc:creator>JM Drupal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Jul 2008 17:29:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=1497#comment-5871</guid>
		<description>This article is not correct. If you want enterprise support level using Drupal you can turn to acquia.com, among some other larger web developers specializing in the frame work. Drupal has also a dedicated security desk in place. Which probably response a little faster and more transparent then black box solutions are able to do. 

As you might assumed - we use Drupal too :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This article is not correct. If you want enterprise support level using Drupal you can turn to acquia.com, among some other larger web developers specializing in the frame work. Drupal has also a dedicated security desk in place. Which probably response a little faster and more transparent then black box solutions are able to do. </p>
<p>As you might assumed &#8211; we use Drupal too <img src='http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':-)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
