<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: BBC dot.life blog: Twitter and the China earthquake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/14/bbc-dotlife-blog-twitter-and-the-china-earthquake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/14/bbc-dotlife-blog-twitter-and-the-china-earthquake/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<pubDate>Sat, 06 Sep 2008 23:02:40 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: China Earthquake</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/14/bbc-dotlife-blog-twitter-and-the-china-earthquake/#comment-2358</link>
		<dc:creator>China Earthquake</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 May 2008 12:54:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/05/14/bbc-dotlife-blog-twitter-and-the-china-earthquake/#comment-2358</guid>
		<description>Interesting story. Twitter as a news vehicle. I am not sure that it is truly a viable option. One could make the same argument for text messaging, albeit not as viral.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting story. Twitter as a news vehicle. I am not sure that it is truly a viable option. One could make the same argument for text messaging, albeit not as viral.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
