<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Facebook useful to local news? If it opened up the networks</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/10/facebook-useful-to-local-news-if-it-opened-up-the-networks/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/10/facebook-useful-to-local-news-if-it-opened-up-the-networks/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 17:39:17 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Rhoda Buchanan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/10/facebook-useful-to-local-news-if-it-opened-up-the-networks/comment-page-1/#comment-1958</link>
		<dc:creator>Rhoda Buchanan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 13 Jan 2008 19:23:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/2008/01/10/facebook-useful-to-local-news-if-it-opened-up-the-networks/#comment-1958</guid>
		<description>Actually, the groups set up by users themselves often provide far more interesting leads for stories than the general statistics on larger areas provided by the network, so I would say that reporters working on smaller patches are not at a disadvantage when it comes to extracting information from facebook, but perhaps even have an advantage.

For example, I was trying to find stories in Rotherham recently: it&#039;s too small for its own network, but because it is small, individuals feel justified in setting up personalised groups associated with the town such as: &#039;Being from Rotherham is not Technically a Disability&#039;, &#039;&quot;Rotherham&quot; is a two syllable word&#039;, &#039;Get ROTHERHAM on Monopoly board!&#039; or &#039;Rotherham floods appeal&#039;. All of these groups offer great starting points for local stories.

I&#039;m not saying that the added bonus of an area network wouldn&#039;t provide useful information for media organisations, but smaller groups tend to be quirkier, and, if set up by users themselves, more opinionated and more angled; I&#039;m not sure if user orchestrated groups focussing on larger areas such as Manchester or London can ever carry the same quality of intensely personal local stories that smaller groups can, thus putting reporters on smaller papers at an advantage when it comes to facebook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, the groups set up by users themselves often provide far more interesting leads for stories than the general statistics on larger areas provided by the network, so I would say that reporters working on smaller patches are not at a disadvantage when it comes to extracting information from facebook, but perhaps even have an advantage.</p>
<p>For example, I was trying to find stories in Rotherham recently: it&#8217;s too small for its own network, but because it is small, individuals feel justified in setting up personalised groups associated with the town such as: &#8216;Being from Rotherham is not Technically a Disability&#8217;, &#8216;&#8221;Rotherham&#8221; is a two syllable word&#8217;, &#8216;Get ROTHERHAM on Monopoly board!&#8217; or &#8216;Rotherham floods appeal&#8217;. All of these groups offer great starting points for local stories.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m not saying that the added bonus of an area network wouldn&#8217;t provide useful information for media organisations, but smaller groups tend to be quirkier, and, if set up by users themselves, more opinionated and more angled; I&#8217;m not sure if user orchestrated groups focussing on larger areas such as Manchester or London can ever carry the same quality of intensely personal local stories that smaller groups can, thus putting reporters on smaller papers at an advantage when it comes to facebook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
