<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Guardian: Court of protection should be open to media, says leading judge</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/11/07/guardian-court-of-protection-should-be-open-to-media-says-leading-judge/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/11/07/guardian-court-of-protection-should-be-open-to-media-says-leading-judge/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 May 2013 17:48:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: theUKhasbecomeajoke</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2011/11/07/guardian-court-of-protection-should-be-open-to-media-says-leading-judge/comment-page-1/#comment-149445</link>
		<dc:creator>theUKhasbecomeajoke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 16 Nov 2011 00:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/?p=40821#comment-149445</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s a grave pity that up to 2 months ago, Sir Nicholas Wall maintained an opposing argument. The disgrace of the UK family courts could have been on public display for all to ridicule, if the likes of this 67 year old lawyer did not attempt to  maintain the current secrecy...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a grave pity that up to 2 months ago, Sir Nicholas Wall maintained an opposing argument. The disgrace of the UK family courts could have been on public display for all to ridicule, if the likes of this 67 year old lawyer did not attempt to  maintain the current secrecy&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
