Embargoes on abstracts and publications from scientific conferences, in this case:
Journalists might not see the fuss here but scientific conferences are usually considered private events with great care taken over the ownership of data and the willingness of researchers to release it prior to publication. Conference abstracts are often useful as they allow different groups of researchers to see if anyone in their field is following the same lines of enquiry as them so collaborations can be arranged, if these were to retreat behind security measures then it would make things a little bit more difficult for everybody.
Gimpyblog begins this debate of the purpose and sanctity of embargoes in journalism following accusations of embargo breaking against Sunday Times journalist Jonathan Leake – and posts defending his actions. You can read the back story here on Roy Greenslade’s blog, but it’s worth reading the comments on Gimpyblog’s post about the role of embargoes in science journalism and beyond.
- Complaint to PCC raises further criticism of Sunday Times’ environment coverage
- Reflections of a Newsosaur: ‘RIP, news embargoes’
- This post is embargoed until 12:55pm (GMT), Dec 18 2008
- ‘Leaking moon water is all Twitter’s fault,’ says BBC science correspondent
- Sunday Times: Breakingviews.com in ‘advanced talks’ with Thomson Reuters