Following on from the recent ‘do journalists need to code’ debate on this blog and elsewhere, Martin Belam argues the answer is both yes and no.
[J]ournalists don’t all need to be able to write program, but the ability to think like a programmer is an invaluable skill.
For example, being able to spot the difference between a small technical change that has a big impact on story-telling, and what appears to be a small change but which has a hugely expensive technical impact, is an essential skill for someone setting the requirements for changes to a website or a CMS.
Newsgathering: Want help with how track and identify someone in a story by their online footprints? Read this post from WIRED on how they carried out basic checks for a story on a missing iPhone prototype. Tipster: Laura Oliver.
But according to Sky News, which issued this statement yesterday evening, Boulton was “strongly” defending his – and Sky News’- journalistic integrity:
In the course of an interview outside Westminster this afternoon [10 May], Sky News political editor Adam Boulton defended his integrity and, by implication, Sky News’, against an attack by Alastair Campbell.
Mr Campbell had said, “You’ve been spending the last four years saying Gordon Brown is dead meat and he should be going anyway.” Adam Boulton strongly defended his impartiality, saying “I’m not saying that, show me where I said that once.”
Mr. Campbell went on to say, ”You’re obviously upset that David Cameron is not Prime Minister” to which Adam replied, “I’m not upset, you are, you keep casting aspersions.”
When challenged by Adam Boulton to substantiate his assertions, Mr Campbell failed to provide any evidence.
I was somewhat taken aback to be the only Labour figure trending on twitter an hour or so after the announcement and the reason – Adam Boulton – was trending all night. Justin Bieber eat your heart out.
Adam gets very touchy at any suggestion that he is anything other than an independent, hugely respected, totally impartial and very important journalist whose personal views never see the light of day, and who works for an organisation that is a superior form of public service than anything the BBC can deliver.
Boulton’s Wikipedia page has already been edited to include the incident, with a certain amount of creativity. ‘Falling of Love: The End of My marriage to Alistair Campbell (2010) Simon & Garfunkel’ seems an unlikely source for the entry.
The transcript (issued by Sky News):
JEREMY THOMPSON:
I’m joined here in Westminster by Alastair Campbell, good evening to you. A lot of people trying to make head or tail of what the Prime Minister said, your colleagues say it’s a dignified and statesman like offering from him, those on the other side of the House saying it is a blatant piece of party gamesmanship and has nothing to do with dignity.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Well it is. I think it brings sense to this very, very complicated and difficult situation which the election result threw up. No party won, no party leader got a very clear mandate. The Tories got most seats, they got the biggest share of the vote and the options remain a minority Tory government, some sort of deal between the Tories and the Liberals and they can carry on their discussions with that but what’s happened today is that Nick Clegg has indicated to Gordon Brown that there may be sense in actually a discussion developing, there has actually been behind the scenes discussions going on but a proper policy based discussion developing between Labour and the Liberal Democrats to see whether the basis for a coalition government can be formed and I think actually a lot of people will feel that’s not a bad …if that materialises is not a bad outcome for this election. Let’s just go back a bit where we were …
JEREMY THOMPSON:
Do you think that’s what the British people really voted for?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Well they certainly voted for change of some sort, no doubt about that … let me finish, they voted for change of some sort …
ADAM BOULTON:
I thought you wanted to have a discussion.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
No, I wanted to answer Jeremy’s question if I may.
ADAM BOULTON:
Oh right.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
They want a change of some sort, they did not go for David Cameron despite the utterly slavish media support that he got, despite all the money from Lord Ashcroft and his friends, despite the fact that we’d had the recession and so forth, they didn’t really want Cameron. There obviously has been, Gordon accepts that there was also …
JEREMY THOMPSON:
Well this was their least worst option. They certainly didn’t give Gordon Brown an endorsement did they?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
What I said was no party leader and no party won.
ADAM BOULTON:
Let’s just look at the facts of the election. In the election you take three main parties …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Yes.
ADAM BOULTON:
… there is one party that lost both in terms of share of the vote and seats, that is Labour. There is one party that is behind the Conservatives and on top of that we have now got a Prime Minister who wants to stay on for four months but is saying he is going to resign in four months time. Now none of that, with all due respect Alastair Campbell, can be seen as a vote of confidence by the voters in the Labour party.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
But nobody is saying that it is, in fact that’s the whole point …
ADAM BOULTON:
But you’re saying nobody won, what I’m saying is if you just look at the results there is a party that is clearly not …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
What you are saying though, look David Cameron didn’t do that much better than some of his predecessors but I accept he got more seats and a bigger share of the vote but my point is …
ADAM BOULTON:
A much bigger share of the vote.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Right, okay, but my point is that constitutionally …
ADAM BOULTON:
And the second point if I can just …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Can I answer the first point?
ADAM BOULTON:
The second point is if you put together the percentages of the vote or the parliamentary seats a Lib-Lab combination doesn’t do it.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
No, you’d then have to look at other parties …
ADAM BOULTON:
It doesn’t have a majority so …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
But nor has a minority Tory government.
ADAM BOULTON:
Yes, but a Lib-Conservative coalition clearly has got a majority and a majority of seats.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
And that may happen, and that may happen, all that’s happened today …
ADAM BOULTON:
Well why not do what Malcolm Wickes says and just go quietly, accept that you lost this election? Why not do what David Blunkett says and accept that you lost this election?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Because I don’t think that would be the right thing to do because I don’t think that is the verdict that the public delivered.
ADAM BOULTON:
What, national interest is what you are seriously thinking about in this?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Yes, it is actually, yes.
ADAM BOULTON:
The nation needs four more months of Gordon Brown limping on until he retires?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Adam, I know that you’ve been spending the last few years saying Gordon Brown is dead meat and he should be going anyway …
ADAM BOULTON:
I’m not saying that, show me where I said that once.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Adam, I don’t want to …
ADAM BOULTON:
But are you saying in the national interest what the nation needs is four more months of Gordon Brown and then resign having lost an election?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
I am saying, I am saying there are three options. One is a Tory minority … none of the are perfect, one is a Tory minority government. That would be perfectly legitimate, okay. It wouldn’t be terribly stable, it might not last very long but it is legitimate. The second is a Lib-Tory deal either …
ADAM BOULTON:
It could be stable.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
… which could be stable but what’s absolutely clear Adam, you can’t tell the Liberal Democrats to do things they don’t want to do.
ADAM BOULTON:
I’m not telling anybody to do anything.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
But you’re sort of saying it is an easy option for them and it’s not and what’s coming through loud and clear from a lot of the Liberal Democrats is that their activists and their supporters are saying, hold on a minute, we did not vote to get you to put David Cameron in power, we voted to stop that happening.
ADAM BOULTON:
Did they vote to keep Gordon Brown in power?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
They voted …
ADAM BOULTON:
Did they vote to keep Gordon Brown in power?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
No, they didn’t and Gordon has accepted that today which is why…
ADAM BOULTON:
Exactly, so on that basis you …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
What does he do, what does he do? Just sort of says here you go, David Cameron come on in, you didn’t actually get the vote you should have done, you didn’t get the majority you said you were going to do …
ADAM BOULTON:
He got a lot more votes and seats than he did.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Yes, I know, you’re obviously upset that David Cameron is not Prime Minister.
ADAM BOULTON:
I’m not upset, you are, you keep casting aspersions and …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Calm down.
ADAM BOULTON:
I am commenting, don’t keep saying what I think.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
This is live on television.
JEREMY THOMPSON:
Alastair, Alastair …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Dignity, dignity.
ADAM BOULTON:
Don’t keep telling me what I think, this is what you do, you come on and you say you haven’t won the election …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Jeremy …
ADAM BOULTON:
… you talk to me, I’m fed up with you telling me what I think, I don’t think that.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
I don’t care what you’re fed up with, you can say what you like. I can tell you my opinion …
ADAM BOULTON:
Don’t tell me what I think.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
I will tell you why I think you are reacting so badly.
JEREMY THOMPSON:
Alastair, you are being a bit provocative here and unnecessarily so.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Well sometimes politics is about passionate things.
JEREMY THOMPSON:
I understand that.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
He is saying Gordon Brown is no longer legitimately in Downing Street, I’m saying he is. He is.
ADAM BOULTON:
No, I’m saying look at the performances in the elections, Labour did worse than the Conservatives, will you accept that?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
I know. They got more seats, of course they did, the Tories go more seats…
ADAM BOULTON:
So you do accept it?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Yes. Equally Gordon Brown is constitutionally perfectly entitled to be Prime Minister and …
JEREMY THOMPSON:
Alastair, just tell me how …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Let me finish this point. He has managed this situation I think perfectly properly. He has today announced he will not be the Prime Minister …
ADAM BOULTON:
Can I ask you a simple question?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Yes.
ADAM BOULTON:
Why hasn’t he had a Cabinet meeting before making this offer?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
He is about to have a Cabinet meeting now.
ADAM BOULTON:
Yes, but now he has made the offer, what can the Cabinet do, why haven’t you had a meeting with the parliamentary Labour party like the Liberal Democrats and the Conservatives have had?
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
He’s having one tomorrow, he’s having one tomorrow.
JEREMY THOMPSON:
Gentlemen, gentlemen.
ADAM BOULTON:
In other words it’s you, totally unelected have plotted this with …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Me?
ADAM BOULTON:
Yes. You are happiest speaking about him …
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
That’s because the Ministers are going to a Cabinet meeting …
ADAM BOULTON:
He has got a parliamentary party, you’re the one that cooked it up, you’re the one that’s cooked it up with Peter Mandelson.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
Oh my God, unbelievable. Adam, calm down.
JEREMY THOMPSON:
Gentlemen, gentlemen, let this debate carry on later. Let’s just remind you that Gordon Brown said a few minutes ago…
ADAM BOULTON:
I actually care about this country.
ALASTAIR CAMPBELL:
You think I don’t care about it, you think I don’t care about it.
ADAM BOULTON:
I don’t think the evidence is there.
JEREMY THOMPSON:
… let’s listen to Gordon Brown’s statement.
It’s Local Newspaper Week this week – an event organised by the Newspaper Society to recognise the role of newspapers in local communities. This year’s focus is local independent journalism and holding public bodies to account.
To mark the week, we want to create a snapshot of a week’s headlines from local newspapers across the UK. We’ve kickstarted the map with a picture of Journalism.co.uk’s local newspaper the Argus in Brighton, but want your pictures of newspaper A-boards or headlines from where you are – whether you’re a journalist at that title or a local reader.
Late Night Marketing discusses how Norwegian newspaper Dagbladet.no lost more than 5,000 natural “inlinks” (links to its website from external sites and blogs) to its website by disabling a feature from blog search engine Twingly on its website:
The first thing here is that Dagbladet.no now loses a lot of blog traffic, but this is not the most important thing, because the traffic from blogs is not enormous compared to the traffic a newspaper can gain from good rankings on search engines.
What do you think that Google will think of your site if you suddenly have approximately 5,000 fewer incoming links per month?
Last week’s Radio 4 In Business programme looked at business newspapers and how some of the world’s best known-brands are struggling to compete with online rivals and in the face of the economic downturn.
Well worth a listen at this link, it includes interview with representatives from the Wall Street Journal, the Economist, Bloomberg and Bloomberg Business Week.
POLIS director Charlie Beckett looks at the challenges a hung parliament poses for journalists:
The likelihood of a hung parliament raises all sorts of interesting procedural issues for journalists – especially the BBC and other Public Service Broadcasters. How do you report impartially and proportionately and how do you avoid getting bogged down in procedural detail? And how will our partisan press respond?
Generally, governments are given the dominant position in news coverage and allowed to dictate terms and set agendas because they have the popular mandate. New governments also tend to get a honeymoon period where the media allow them to set out their stall and give them the benefit of the doubt.
America is a huge, scattered country. Before mass television, before satellite printing and long before the internet, it needed news magazines to set a national agenda and provide a common framework of fact and perception. It needed Time and then its slightly more liberal competitor, Newsweek.
But now the national agenda rasps away on cable 24/7. Now the facts are familiar and the perceptions old hat by the time they drop on the mat. Now readers don’t want to be told what’s happened in the past seven days, but how it fits and what to think about it. They need analysis and context, in short: not old, broken news. They need The Economist.
For the 2010 general election, the Guardian’s senior political correspondent Andrew Sparrow has been tasked with liveblogging the event on an almost daily basis. In this post for PDA he explains his approach, the practical considerations and the benefits for journalists and readers:
I live blog a lot and I believe the format – minute-by-minute updates, combining news, analysis and links – allows journalists to report events with more thoroughness and immediacy than if they are just writing stories (…) If journalism is the first draft of history, live blogging is the first draft of journalism. It’s not perfect, but it’s deeply rewarding – on any day, I was able to publish almost every snippet that I thought worth sharing, which is not the case for anyone who has to squeeze material into a newspaper – and it beats sitting on a battlebus.
On a typical day the site’s liveblog generated between 100,000 and 150,000 page views, rising to 2 million on election night, adds Sparrow.
