<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Independent apologises for &#8216;seriously defamatory&#8217; headline</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/12/independent-apologises-for-seriously-defamatory-headline/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/12/independent-apologises-for-seriously-defamatory-headline/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Independent on Sunday offers blogger damages over &#8216;hooker&#8217; headline &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/12/independent-apologises-for-seriously-defamatory-headline/comment-page-1/#comment-37517</link>
		<dc:creator>Independent on Sunday offers blogger damages over &#8216;hooker&#8217; headline &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:56:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=19629#comment-37517</guid>
		<description>[...] On 12 March the IoS apologised for the error, which it said was written by the newspaper not Ms Marg...: &#8220;We accept that Ms Margolis is not and never has been &#8216;a hooker&#8217; or otherwise involved in the sex industry. The wording of the headline was a mistake and seriously defamatory of Ms Margolis. We offer our sincere apologies to Ms Margolis for the damage to her reputation and the distress and embarrassment which she has suffered.&#8221; [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] On 12 March the IoS apologised for the error, which it said was written by the newspaper not Ms Marg&#8230;: &#8220;We accept that Ms Margolis is not and never has been &#8216;a hooker&#8217; or otherwise involved in the sex industry. The wording of the headline was a mistake and seriously defamatory of Ms Margolis. We offer our sincere apologies to Ms Margolis for the damage to her reputation and the distress and embarrassment which she has suffered.&#8221; [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Generalissues&#39;s Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/03/12/independent-apologises-for-seriously-defamatory-headline/comment-page-1/#comment-30428</link>
		<dc:creator>Generalissues&#39;s Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Mar 2010 18:05:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=19629#comment-30428</guid>
		<description>[...] to Comments  Defamation can have very negative impact on people&#8217;s life or institutions’ reputation. However this should not be a reason for people in UK to sue anybody [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] to Comments  Defamation can have very negative impact on people&#8217;s life or institutions’ reputation. However this should not be a reason for people in UK to sue anybody [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

