Browse > Home / Archive: February 2010

#Tip of the day from Journalism.co.uk – tracking stories on your patch

February 12th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted by in Editors' pick, Top tips for journalists

Tracking news: Use Lazyfeed to track the latest stories and developments being written about your patch. You can monitor several topics at once, which will update in real-time from 1.5 million websites. Tipster: Laura Oliver.

To submit a tip to Journalism.co.uk, use this link – we will pay a fiver for the best ones published.

Similar posts:

An experiment with UK newspapers’ coverage of political polls

February 11th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted by in Journalism, Newspapers

The problems associated with media coverage of political opinion polling is being tackled on the Liberal Democrat Voice blog by one of its contributors Mark Pack.

“The most obvious problem is when an opinion poll from one polling company is compared not with the previous poll from that company but against an older one because the intervening one happened to have been published by a different media outlet,” explains Pack in a post last month.

As such Pack has committed himself to scoring polls commissioned by the UK’s newspapers on the way in which their initial reports on their polls are worded.

The system for scoring the papers asks whether the title has: followed the British Polling Council’s rules; reported the fieldwork dates for the poll; and are changes in party support from the last poll conducted by that paper referenced in the report.

According to the scores for January, the Sunday Mirror and the Times are faring the best on Pack’s scale; while the Sunday Telegraph and the Times have the least points.

While its not a scientific exercise, it will be interesting to see in the build-up to the election how poll coverage changes and which papers collect the most “brownie points” as more months of data are collected.

Tags: , , ,

Similar posts:

Sanjay Gupta and Haiti: should a journalist get involved in a story?

February 11th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted by in Journalism

Dr Sanjay Gupta is CNN’s chief medical correspondent, but also a practising neurosurgeon. This means that during CNN’s coverage of the Haitian earthquake and its aftermath Gupta has been reporting from the field, but also filmed performing surgery and working in an emergency medical clinic.

Today’s Connect the World show on CNN will explore the issues this raises from whether journalists can/should be part of a story to whether Gupta can carry out his role as a doctor and a journalist at the same time without undermining either position. The show airs at 9pm (GMT).

Tags: , ,

Similar posts:

Behind the scenes at BBC’s Question Time

February 11th, 2010 | 1 Comment | Posted by in Broadcasting

For a little over 30 years, BBC panel show Question Time has been at the centre of controversial debate in the UK. But how do they do it? What goes on behind the set week in week out? I got the chance to speak with the programme’s director Rob Hopkin, who gave me an insight into the secret of producing a show like Question Time.

According to the the Question Time website, the heart of the programme is its audience. “We don’t invite anyone” said Hopkin. “We have a dedicated producer who chooses a representative audience that reflects the demographic length. It is an honestly picked audience.” Every week audience producer Alison Fuller has to select the audience and, depending on the city they are in, this can mean considering more than 4,000 applications. This process involves checking the background of every applicant against their political affiliations, campaign involvements, advertising intentions, and many other factors.

As the 150 people she selects are intended to embody the image of their city in the eyes of the programme’s nationwide audience, her job is one of the most important for the programme’s production.

Those selected to appear in the audience are invited to arrive at 6:00pm, but the programme records from 8:30pm to 9.30pm. This gives them over two hours of waiting. So what happens while they wait?

“When the audience turns up we give them tea and biscuits and they go through the whole process, but most importantly of all, we give them pens and paper and little cards for them to write their questions on,” explained Hopkin. “While they are waiting, we show them BBC’s News at Six, the ITV’s 6.30pm News and Channel 4′s 7:00pm news. It is very important that people ask questions about what is in the news that day.”

Hopkin described the question selection process: “Most of the questions are selected on the day. All the pieces of card with the questions are brought to the editorial team and they just separate the good questions from the not so good ones, and they end up with about eight to ten questions. But we won’t have time for that; we might have time for five or six. And often there are questions which are very good but on the same topic, so we might have two questions on the same topic. But we need to have extras, just in case.”

Asked about the origin of the questions, Hopkin stressed that they come from no-one but the audience: “This is the crucial thing because we are always being accused of telling the audience what questions to ask. People think that what we do is take our questions, give them to the audience, and get them to read them out. But that absolutely does not happen.

“Doing that would undermine the whole premise, and what’s the point in that? The programme is absolutely upfront, it does what it says on the package: this is the audience asking questions to the politicians.

“The other thing that we are accused of is that we have told the politicians what the questions are. I can guarantee we do not do that. They sit there and they do not know what the audience is going to ask. [...] You can see that, and we are here to expose and to reveal things by getting a slightly more honest response from people.”

This approach gives the programme a journalistic edge, with every member of the editorial team having years of experience behind them. The average age of these “very sharp cookies”, as Hopkin describes them, is in the early 30s.

The production team, roughly 50 strong, is also made up of very experienced staff. “To achieve the right level of technical expertise you have to have the confidence in operating this heavy equipment as quickly as we ask them to,” said Hopkin, “you can’t put fairly young or inexperienced people in; they’ve got to have some years of being in control of things and be prepared to put independent thought into it.”

Although the show is not live, the production team has less than an hour after they finish recording before the show goes on air. This means there is not time for serious editing. All the team can do is crop bits of film here and there, taking into account legal matters and the audience’s emotions when talking to camera.

Hopkin explained: “I’ve had conversations with experienced journalists who have watched Question Time but never seen it in operation, and they say: ‘Well you must do an awful lot of post-production and editing’ and I say: ‘No, it goes out as we record it. We record it and send it, and that’s it.’ They say: ‘But you must do a lot of edits to tighten the sound up’ and I say: ‘No, there’s never high end tie, because the boom mikes have a spotter, who’s watching and saying: ‘That person it’s pointing to, the person up here, that’s green mike’, and green mike says: ‘That’s me’. When David says ‘Gentlemen on the front row of the back…’ he’s already there.

“So the person says ‘Oh yes, I’d like to ask so and so…’ and that way the system works. It’s a technique and a process that’s been honed over 30 years of this programme.”

On the set, a simple count reveals four spotters with boom mikes and eight cameramen. One of these is the steady cam, which needs another member of the team to carry the wires. “Given timing, for my role as the director, I can’t direct and call every shot,” confesses Hopkin. “What happens is that they all know the areas they can cover from where they operate, and they know the kind of shots they can get, and they know the programme so well that when somebody starts to speak they immediately offer the shot. So my job becomes one of saying, ‘That’s lovely. Thank you very much indeed, I’ll take that’ or ‘No, I won’t have that’. It’s more selection than direction. You don’t have to drive this crew, the crew are very safely driving themselves.”

During their two rehearsals they check the mikes and the shots over and over again. They even do a mock question, with the panel and David Dimbleby, right before they start shooting, adding up to a staggering three rehearsals and many more checks. Being a show with little or no script, where people are brought together to argue their views and get their answers, it might seem quite impossible to keep an audience of 150 and a panel of 5 strongly opinionated personalities together, but Hopkin very calmly says: “That’s all David’s work. He’s the chairman and he’s responsible for them.”

The show runs in a different city every week, produced out of the six trucks it travels with, as there’s no Question Time headquarters except for production offices in Oxford, London and Scotland.

I ask Rob if the travelling can get too much, but he shrugs it off:  “Oh I don’t travel for over 30 weeks. You come up and you do the show, and then you go back home.” It’s a busy schedule, but to him it’s just another job: “I have lots of other things to do; this is just a day a week.”

Tags: , , ,

Similar posts:

From the Daily Dispatch: Reporting investigative journalism online

February 11th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted by in Online Journalism

Jan Hennop is online news editor at Daily Dispatch, a South African news organisation specialising in online investigative journalism. This piece on the site’s investigation to see if government promises to improve schools in rural South Africa had been kept first appeared on Poynter Online and is reproduced here with permission.

Read Journalism.co.uk’s Q&A with the Daily Dispatch’s online team at this link.

Towards the end of 2009, a team of four young Daily Dispatch reporters – two print reporters, a photographer and a videographer – travelled deep into rural South Africa to do an investigative project looking at education.

They were following up on a promise made by the country’s education minister Naledi Pandor after a visit a year before to the Mbizana district, in the rolling green hills of the Eastern Cape province, not far from where former president Nelson Mandela was born.

Pandor’s visit was prompted by the fact that the Mbizana district represented the worst 12th grade (commonly referred to as ‘Matric’) results nationwide in South Africa in 2008.

Here, only 29.3 per cent of all pupils passed high school that year. And even if they did, their marks were so low, the standard of their education so poor, that very few if any, stood a chance of entering college or a university.

“Never again” would this failure be allowed to happen again, Minister Pandor promised during her visit.

A year later, as the Class of 2009 were sitting down to write their final exams, a Dispatch team once again visited the area to see if the minister’s promise was kept.

For two weeks, our team lived with pupils and visited schools, speaking to principals, teachers, pupils and parents.

Although there were some glimmers of hope, our team found that rural education in South Africa remains in deep crisis.

A failure to live up to promises continued to lead to the failed futures of a generation of poor, rural and mainly black South African children.

We discovered horrific conditions in the classroom – as well as at home.

In some schools, up to 120 kids were crammed into one class – and there were in Grade 12 some students as old as 25, some with children of their own – adding a different social dynamic to schooling.

Many of these “older” pupils, like Nomalanga Qadi, are not only trying to get through school: she’s also raising a baby of her own, as well as children belonging to relatives. She does not have a job and like millions of other South Africans, depends on a government hand-out to keep her alive.

Our investigation looked at three schools: one which was doing relatively well under the circumstances; another where the situation was hovering on the abyss; and a third, where education has turned into an absolute disaster.

What our team found was that the realities facing these schools was an echo of those facing thousands of other schools in rural South Africa.

And that rural education in South Africa needs urgent intervention.

We hope our investigation will help to focus government’s attention on this crisis.

At the same time, we wanted to present our work in a creative and interesting way, especially online.

So how did we do it?

Landing page: DispatchOnline’s senior graphic artist Rudi Louw used Flash animation on our landing page to scroll a small introduction in the left hand corner. We have also built in a Flash mouse-over effect which gives a small introduction of the situation at each school we looked at.

Blogs: As per our other online investigations, we used WordPress as our blogging platform. We embedded both galleries as well as video plug-ins to help us enhance our story. Our team in the field shot the pics and video and edited it offline.

Since our connection speeds in rural areas in SA are either non-existent or very slow (256 kbps), our online postings were done after the team returned from the field, which did somewhat slow down our production time.

Video: For the first time we really pursued a television-reporting-style approach to the subject, with our young reporter Asa Sokopo interviewing her subjects. The video editing process would start in the field by the DispatchOnline’s videographer Sino Majangaza.

Flipbook for WordPress: One of the coolest and latest additions to our online arsenal is the use of a flipbook plugin, which allowed us to tell pupils’ story in a very unique and special way.

We are particularly proud of our “Book of Dreams” which gives the reader the ultimate feeling of authenticity when reading the hopes and dreams of these pupils.

Map: We again used a Google interactive map to mark the positions of the schools and supply interesting statistical data about them.

Striking stories: If you are prepared to spend a bit of time like our team did, you will find a wealth of of stories in rural South Africa.

One of the most striking stories is that of 25-year-old Nomalanga Qadi: Nomalanga is no ordinary matric pupil – she is 25-years-old and is the sole guardian of her brother Mandla, 15, and sister  Zanele, 13. She is also a mother to two-year-old Lungani.

She takes time off from Nomagqwethekana Comprehensive Technical High School to fetch social grants she needs  to support her family.

Our team hopes that focusing on the desperate situation of Qadi and others like her will help to improve their lot in life.

All-in-all, this was one of our most rewarding online investigations to date and we hope the experience we had with it will inspire other journalists around the world to do the same.

Tags: , ,

Similar posts:

What’s the average cost of a news article?

February 11th, 2010 | 7 Comments | Posted by in Business, Journalism, Newspapers

Media journalist Patrick Smith asks on this blog today How much is an article worth? His answer, as far as likely online readers are concerned, is very little.

This got me thinking. How much does a news article cost to produce? Journalism.co.uk is an online-only operation – a bootstrap operation as Kevin Anderson once called it – and obviously has much lower overheads than London-based national newsaper businesses. But if we could work out the cost-per-article for our own business, then that would at least provide a baseline guide to the likely costs to Murdoch et al.

Taking into account wages, expenses and a percentage of overall overheads (rent, bills etc), but discounting non-news-related administration, aggregation, tip of the days etc, we calculated the average cost of an article (feature, news story or blog post) to be around £37.00.

We have no intention of erecting a paywall around our news content, but if we were to, just to recoup that expenditure we would need 370 people to pay 10p each to read each article, or 3,700 to pay 1p each. In 2009, the average number of page views per article on our blog and main site was 440 (this includes all our aggregation posts, which probably skew the figure downwards slightly) but that means at current traffic levels we would need a model of 10p per article to be paid for by 84 per cent of our current readers.

Factoring in the much greater overheads of national newspaper publications, I would guess that the cost per article could be as much as 10 times the cost to us, perhaps around the £400 mark. I could be wildly off, and would be very interested to hear from anyone who has actually analysed this properly, but I think it is pretty obvious that there is a serious problem with the paywall model as a sole path to profitable news production.

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Similar posts:

#followjourn: Angela Corrias/freelance journalist

February 11th, 2010 | No Comments | Posted by in Recommended journalists

#followjourn: Angela Corrias

Who? Freelance journalist, traveler and photographer.

What? Corrias is an accomplished travel, political and lifestyle writer, with her own travel blog, Travel Calling. After studying International Relations and Globalisation at London Metropolitan University, Corrias worked her way up to become a journalist for Herald de Paris. Being fluent in Italian, French and English has allowed for a life of travelling.

Where? Learn more about Corrias and read a selection of her articles here on her website.

Contact? Follow @angelacorrias

Just as we like to supply you with fresh and innovative tips every day, we’re recommending journalists to follow online too. They might be from any sector of the industry: please send suggestions (you can nominate yourself) to judith or laura at journalism.co.uk; or to @journalismnews.

Tags: , , ,

Similar posts:

Brighton Argus launches parliamentary candidate tracker

The Argus in Brighton is to track the whereabouts of different parliamentary candidates in the run-up to the general election, using Google Maps.

The project, launched by the Argus’ online editor Jo Wadsworth today, was originally the brain child of journalist and media trainer Steve Bustin, journalist Sarah Marshall and others, during a group activity at the first Brighton Future of News event [Disclaimer: I was the organiser of the inaugural meet-up].

The map allows Google account users to mark where they have seen candidates for the Brighton Pavilion constituency – Green Party candidate Caroline Lucas, Labour’s Nancy Platts and the Conservative’s Charlotte Vere – and upload additional information about what they said.

The MP candidate tracker page also displays tweets sent out by each candidate.

“I was really glad when election coverage was one of the discussion ideas, and when I heard Steve Bustin suggest the map, I loved it, and as soon as I had a spare couple of hours, I decided to put it together,” said Jo Wadsworth.

“Here in Brighton we’ve got one of the most interesting election battles in Brighton Pavilion, where the Green Party’s Caroline Lucas has her party’s best ever chance of picking up a seat in Parliament. But it’s a very close-run thing, with strong competition from both Labour’s Nancy Platts and the Conservative’s Charlotte Vere.

“Luckily for me, all three are also on Twitter, which gave me enough material to kick-start the data on the map, with very interesting results. It’s surprising how little green there is there, for instance, and the red and blue markers are already showing a clear geographical divergence. But that was the easy part – the real challenge now is actually getting voters to add their own markers.”

Within a few hours of launch, the project had already received its first public edit – from Green Party councillor Jason Kitcat (@JasonKitcat).

Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Similar posts:

BIA/Kelsey Blog: Associated Content CEO – ‘local is a differentiator’

The ‘open content network’ Associated Content is looking to own more localised event content with advertising, its CEO told BIA/Kelsey in an interview for its blog.

Associated Content, which has over 350,000 contributors (and 60 employees),  gathers and syndicates content around the web. CEO Patrick Keane told BIA/Kelsey that the company can also develop content on a “custom” basis for commercial clients, which it has done for Reuters, Hachette, Procter & Gamble and Toyota.

Publishers – who Keane calls “the owners of audience” – can increasingly see the value of unique content creation assets, he says. AOL, for instance, owns less than 10 percent of its content. Yahoo’s percentage of ownership may not be much higher.

For such sites, local content is a key differentiator, especially since so much of it has a utility angle. We see more and more contributors contributing content on a localised basis, says Keane. Consequently, one of Associated Content’s big initiatives is to find, discern and empower contributors on the basis of local DNA.

Full post at this link…

Tags: , , , , ,

Similar posts:

Dennis Publishing launches new consumer tech site

Paul Lomax, chief technology officer at Dennis Publishing, reports on a new consumer site launched by Dennis Publishing:

Dennis Publishing has today launched a consumer technology site www.expertreviews.co.uk to capitalise on the ever increasing number of buyers of technology who research, spec, compare and buy products online. The launch is supported by Toshiba, which is using the site to market its latest laptop – the five-star-rated Satellite T130.

Full post at this link…

Tags: , ,

Similar posts:

© Mousetrap Media Ltd. Theme: modified version of Statement