<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The London Weekly: some unanswered questions</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: A case study in crowdsourcing investigative journalism (part 3): The London Weekly &#124; Online Journalism Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-146990</link>
		<dc:creator>A case study in crowdsourcing investigative journalism (part 3): The London Weekly &#124; Online Journalism Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Nov 2011 08:06:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-146990</guid>
		<description>[...] and The Guardian podcast Media Talk; some formed the basis for posts on James Ball&#8217;s blog, Journalism.co.uk and the Online Journalism Blog. Some has, for legal reasons, remained [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] and The Guardian podcast Media Talk; some formed the basis for posts on James Ball&#8217;s blog, Journalism.co.uk and the Online Journalism Blog. Some has, for legal reasons, remained [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob-1</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-25294</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob-1</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Feb 2010 18:04:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-25294</guid>
		<description>Domen thelondonweekly.net was register in october 2008</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Domen thelondonweekly.net was register in october 2008</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jj</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-25116</link>
		<dc:creator>jj</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:34:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-25116</guid>
		<description>Another odd note: the address for http://www.thelondonweekly.net/ is listed as 145 - 157 St John St, but if Google Maps is accurate, the postcode is several blocks away at Hull St.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Another odd note: the address for <a href="http://www.thelondonweekly.net/" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelondonweekly.net/</a> is listed as 145 &#8211; 157 St John St, but if Google Maps is accurate, the postcode is several blocks away at Hull St.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Open letter to the London Weekly and Invincible Media &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-25114</link>
		<dc:creator>Open letter to the London Weekly and Invincible Media &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 10:22:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-25114</guid>
		<description>[...] strong doubts about its viability and existence, the London Weekly did launch as the capital&#8217;s latest [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] strong doubts about its viability and existence, the London Weekly did launch as the capital&#8217;s latest [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jamesrb.co.uk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Open Letter to The London Weekly</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-25079</link>
		<dc:creator>jamesrb.co.uk &#187; Blog Archive &#187; An Open Letter to The London Weekly</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Feb 2010 23:38:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-25079</guid>
		<description>[...] are quite a few. Scores of people, including myself; Judith Townend of journalism.co.uk; the users of helpmeinvestegate.com; Media Guardian and Twitter users @Coneee, @Kjalee, @VickyJo, [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] are quite a few. Scores of people, including myself; Judith Townend of journalism.co.uk; the users of helpmeinvestegate.com; Media Guardian and Twitter users @Coneee, @Kjalee, @VickyJo, [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lyn</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24964</link>
		<dc:creator>Lyn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Feb 2010 22:12:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24964</guid>
		<description>Got to be a hoax. It&#039;s just too ridiculous (look at the random awards categories ... &#039;Car of the Year&#039;???) ... in a paper for Londoners???: http://www.thelondonweekly.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=category&amp;layout=blog&amp;id=16&amp;Itemid=52
Also note that the Wiki profile of Jordan Kensington includes his parents, Agnes and Emmanuel. Both names appear, alongside that of Mother Theresa, on the list of staff no-one has heard of (http://www.thelondonweekly.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&amp;view=category&amp;layout=blog&amp;id=73&amp;Itemid=110). 
Plus all the typos, er, unusual spellings, in staff names &#039;Libberman&#039;, Mellissa&#039;, &#039;Donnovan&#039; - surely they can&#039;t all be correct.
Has anyone asked Gemma Cairney for her opinion, given she&#039;s meant to be a columnist? http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemma_Cairney
If it is a hoax, we&#039;re all getting sucked in as we&#039;re wasting far too much time thinking about this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Got to be a hoax. It&#8217;s just too ridiculous (look at the random awards categories &#8230; &#8216;Car of the Year&#8217;???) &#8230; in a paper for Londoners???: <a href="http://www.thelondonweekly.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=category&#038;layout=blog&#038;id=16&#038;Itemid=52" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelondonweekly.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=category&#038;layout=blog&#038;id=16&#038;Itemid=52</a><br />
Also note that the Wiki profile of Jordan Kensington includes his parents, Agnes and Emmanuel. Both names appear, alongside that of Mother Theresa, on the list of staff no-one has heard of (<a href="http://www.thelondonweekly.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=category&#038;layout=blog&#038;id=73&#038;Itemid=110" rel="nofollow">http://www.thelondonweekly.co.uk/index.php?option=com_content&#038;view=category&#038;layout=blog&#038;id=73&#038;Itemid=110</a>).<br />
Plus all the typos, er, unusual spellings, in staff names &#8216;Libberman&#8217;, Mellissa&#8217;, &#8216;Donnovan&#8217; &#8211; surely they can&#8217;t all be correct.<br />
Has anyone asked Gemma Cairney for her opinion, given she&#8217;s meant to be a columnist? <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemma_Cairney" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gemma_Cairney</a><br />
If it is a hoax, we&#8217;re all getting sucked in as we&#8217;re wasting far too much time thinking about this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Paul Lomax</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24846</link>
		<dc:creator>Paul Lomax</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:43:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24846</guid>
		<description>Joe: He might exist but you still might be on to something with Jordan Kensington.

3. His mother was called Agnes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe: He might exist but you still might be on to something with Jordan Kensington.</p>
<p>3. His mother was called Agnes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24845</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 14:40:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24845</guid>
		<description>James - the company could easily be registered under some other name.  Or perhaps not at all if they haven&#039;t started trading yet. 

I think my point is that this is clearly not a spoof (what would be the point? what is the ultimate joke? spoofs are much clearer cut and shorter-lived than this.  If you wanted to spoof, what you&#039;d do is print an ACTUAL newspaper - just one print run).  It may well be a mismanaged, shoddily set up corporate entity which has exaggerated its own support and will soon collapse.  We don&#039;t quite know that yet though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James &#8211; the company could easily be registered under some other name.  Or perhaps not at all if they haven&#8217;t started trading yet. </p>
<p>I think my point is that this is clearly not a spoof (what would be the point? what is the ultimate joke? spoofs are much clearer cut and shorter-lived than this.  If you wanted to spoof, what you&#8217;d do is print an ACTUAL newspaper &#8211; just one print run).  It may well be a mismanaged, shoddily set up corporate entity which has exaggerated its own support and will soon collapse.  We don&#8217;t quite know that yet though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Moffatt</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24727</link>
		<dc:creator>Moffatt</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 17:38:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24727</guid>
		<description> Many wasted calls to them re messing people around over last 3 months. They all say &quot;I&#039;m just a receptionist, I can&#039;t put you through.&quot; This time I said I was going to the police if they didn&#039;t give me a name. The receptionist then said the director is Steven Campbell. Write to him at the address in Hackney. Receptionist&#039;s name, Sarah Mills. Might be a great spoof but they are costing people time and money. Joke wearing thin.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many wasted calls to them re messing people around over last 3 months. They all say &#8220;I&#8217;m just a receptionist, I can&#8217;t put you through.&#8221; This time I said I was going to the police if they didn&#8217;t give me a name. The receptionist then said the director is Steven Campbell. Write to him at the address in Hackney. Receptionist&#8217;s name, Sarah Mills. Might be a great spoof but they are costing people time and money. Joke wearing thin.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The London Weekly starting to look like a mirage &#124; The Wire &#124; Press Gazette</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24706</link>
		<dc:creator>The London Weekly starting to look like a mirage &#124; The Wire &#124; Press Gazette</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 12:18:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24706</guid>
		<description>[...] Journalism.co.uk has found out that there is a new editor, Alan Mills, and has spoken to a human being on the telephone who is involved in the project - so well done them! Head of display Angus Auden assures them it is not a &#8220;wind up&#8221; and says: &#8220;There are a lot of people in offices all over the place.” [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Journalism.co.uk has found out that there is a new editor, Alan Mills, and has spoken to a human being on the telephone who is involved in the project &#8211; so well done them! Head of display Angus Auden assures them it is not a &#8220;wind up&#8221; and says: &#8220;There are a lot of people in offices all over the place.” [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24704</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:29:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24704</guid>
		<description>Mind you, he does at least appear to exist.  I was starting to think there was no evidence that this was a real person: http://bit.ly/cKpC3v</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mind you, he does at least appear to exist.  I was starting to think there was no evidence that this was a real person: <a href="http://bit.ly/cKpC3v" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/cKpC3v</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24701</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24701</guid>
		<description>And another thing.  Check out Jordan Kensington&#039;s wikipedia page. http://bit.ly/ES2gR

Two things:

1.  The Mother Teresa link

2.  He has a school in Cameroon and St Lucia.  St Lucia??  That is a long way from Cameroon.

The problem with the hoax idea is that this is a lot of complexity (lots of websites, wikipedia pages etc etc) to go to isn&#039;t it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And another thing.  Check out Jordan Kensington&#8217;s wikipedia page. <a href="http://bit.ly/ES2gR" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/ES2gR</a></p>
<p>Two things:</p>
<p>1.  The Mother Teresa link</p>
<p>2.  He has a school in Cameroon and St Lucia.  St Lucia??  That is a long way from Cameroon.</p>
<p>The problem with the hoax idea is that this is a lot of complexity (lots of websites, wikipedia pages etc etc) to go to isn&#8217;t it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martin</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24700</link>
		<dc:creator>Martin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:07:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24700</guid>
		<description>... and surely anyone who had really pooled £10.5m from several investors would probably want some sort of formal legal structure for that organisation?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and surely anyone who had really pooled £10.5m from several investors would probably want some sort of formal legal structure for that organisation?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24699</link>
		<dc:creator>joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 11:03:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24699</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not sure who should do this, but it would be very interesting to ring up as a potential advertiser and see what kind of information they&#039;re giving out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not sure who should do this, but it would be very interesting to ring up as a potential advertiser and see what kind of information they&#8217;re giving out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: James</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2010/02/02/the-london-weekly-some-unanswered-questions/comment-page-1/#comment-24698</link>
		<dc:creator>James</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 10:58:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=18042#comment-24698</guid>
		<description>Bob - you&#039;re right that a new company wouldn&#039;t have accounts at Companies House, but its articles of association etc WOULD be published if it existed. 

Companies created as little as a few weeks ago already have their documents on the site. It&#039;s a legal requirement when establishing a ltd company.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bob &#8211; you&#8217;re right that a new company wouldn&#8217;t have accounts at Companies House, but its articles of association etc WOULD be published if it existed. </p>
<p>Companies created as little as a few weeks ago already have their documents on the site. It&#8217;s a legal requirement when establishing a ltd company.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

