<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Readers can alert Telegraph to breaking stories with new version of iPhone app</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/12/04/readers-can-alert-telegraph-to-breaking-stories-with-new-version-of-iphone-app/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/12/04/readers-can-alert-telegraph-to-breaking-stories-with-new-version-of-iphone-app/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bob Anan</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/12/04/readers-can-alert-telegraph-to-breaking-stories-with-new-version-of-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-22482</link>
		<dc:creator>Bob Anan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 15:46:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=16512#comment-22482</guid>
		<description>Pitiful effort from the Telegraph really.  They&#039;re only offering £100 - and that in vouchers, not cash - for a story.  If you were a freelancer you&#039;d make a couple of times that, and you wouldn&#039;t be paid in vouchers, either!  If the paper were really serious about user-generated stories they&#039;d put a lot more resources into a contest and paying for content.  They might get a story or two on the cheap but they&#039;re certainly not laying the groundwork for a huge uptick in crowdsourced journalism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Pitiful effort from the Telegraph really.  They&#8217;re only offering £100 &#8211; and that in vouchers, not cash &#8211; for a story.  If you were a freelancer you&#8217;d make a couple of times that, and you wouldn&#8217;t be paid in vouchers, either!  If the paper were really serious about user-generated stories they&#8217;d put a lot more resources into a contest and paying for content.  They might get a story or two on the cheap but they&#8217;re certainly not laying the groundwork for a huge uptick in crowdsourced journalism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Telegraph goes iPhone &#8211; but there&#8217;s no app for checking copy &#124; Contently Managed - Digital PR, Social Media, Traditional PR Solutions and Strategy</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/12/04/readers-can-alert-telegraph-to-breaking-stories-with-new-version-of-iphone-app/comment-page-1/#comment-22475</link>
		<dc:creator>Telegraph goes iPhone &#8211; but there&#8217;s no app for checking copy &#124; Contently Managed - Digital PR, Social Media, Traditional PR Solutions and Strategy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Dec 2009 12:31:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=16512#comment-22475</guid>
		<description>[...] Daily Telegraph has made it easier for people to submit stories and tip-offs to them with a new iPhone app but the question not being asked is: who&#8217;s checking the incoming stream for story quality? [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Daily Telegraph has made it easier for people to submit stories and tip-offs to them with a new iPhone app but the question not being asked is: who&#8217;s checking the incoming stream for story quality? [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

