<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PCC rules Daily Mail not in breach of code over Iain Dale diary piece</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/06/pcc-rules-daily-mail-not-in-breach-of-code-over-iain-dale-diary-piece/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/06/pcc-rules-daily-mail-not-in-breach-of-code-over-iain-dale-diary-piece/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Press Complaints Commission &#8216;whitewash&#8217; criticised by MPs &#124; The Spicy Cauldron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/06/pcc-rules-daily-mail-not-in-breach-of-code-over-iain-dale-diary-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-21553</link>
		<dc:creator>Press Complaints Commission &#8216;whitewash&#8217; criticised by MPs &#124; The Spicy Cauldron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 09 Nov 2009 07:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15717#comment-21553</guid>
		<description>[...] PCC rules Daily Mail not in breach of code over Iain Dale diary piece (blogs.journalism.co.uk) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PCC rules Daily Mail not in breach of code over Iain Dale diary piece (blogs.journalism.co.uk) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: What does PCC Iain Dale ruling bode for Jan Moir case? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/06/pcc-rules-daily-mail-not-in-breach-of-code-over-iain-dale-diary-piece/comment-page-1/#comment-21463</link>
		<dc:creator>What does PCC Iain Dale ruling bode for Jan Moir case? &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors&#39; Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:44:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15717#comment-21463</guid>
		<description>[...] As noted a short while ago, the Press Complaints Commission ruled that it had found a Daily Mail diary piece about potential Conservative candidate Iain Dale not to be in breach of the PCC code. &#8220;I still think it was a clear breach of Section 12 [discrimination] of the PCC code.  I quite agree with what they say about the right to offend, but this was gratuitous and it was the second time it had happened,&#8221; Iain Dale told Journalism.co.uk. [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] As noted a short while ago, the Press Complaints Commission ruled that it had found a Daily Mail diary piece about potential Conservative candidate Iain Dale not to be in breach of the PCC code. &#8220;I still think it was a clear breach of Section 12 [discrimination] of the PCC code.  I quite agree with what they say about the right to offend, but this was gratuitous and it was the second time it had happened,&#8221; Iain Dale told Journalism.co.uk. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

