<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Media Blog: What&#8217;s the value of a journalist that Twitters?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/the-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/the-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Barker</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/the-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters/comment-page-1/#comment-21464</link>
		<dc:creator>David Barker</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2009 12:53:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15670#comment-21464</guid>
		<description>Twitter will end up being a valid sourse for journalists. It&#039;s simply a case of knowing who to follow.

For example, our local weekly, The Rotherham Advertiser, picked up a Tweet from ex-Dragon&#039;s Den &quot;Dragon&quot; Rachel Elnaugh, which linked to her blog and her negative eexperience of the town (http://racheleelnaugh.blogspot.com/2009/10/dismal-rotherham.html), which they then turned into a 2 page exclusive.

It&#039;s a small example, but as Twitter grows and its users become more diverse, I see canny journos using it to their advantage.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter will end up being a valid sourse for journalists. It&#8217;s simply a case of knowing who to follow.</p>
<p>For example, our local weekly, The Rotherham Advertiser, picked up a Tweet from ex-Dragon&#8217;s Den &#8220;Dragon&#8221; Rachel Elnaugh, which linked to her blog and her negative eexperience of the town (<a href="http://racheleelnaugh.blogspot.com/2009/10/dismal-rotherham.html" rel="nofollow">http://racheleelnaugh.blogspot.com/2009/10/dismal-rotherham.html</a>), which they then turned into a 2 page exclusive.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a small example, but as Twitter grows and its users become more diverse, I see canny journos using it to their advantage.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Greg Watts</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/11/05/the-media-blog-whats-the-value-of-a-journalist-that-twitters/comment-page-1/#comment-21418</link>
		<dc:creator>Greg Watts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 10:40:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15670#comment-21418</guid>
		<description>Perhaps I&#039;m missing something, but I still can&#039;t see any value in Twitter for journalists. I&#039;ve scanned dozens of Twitter postings and all I&#039;ve come across is either people saying they are about to have a cup of coffee/ pick up their dry cleaning/go to Tesco, or commenting on the weather or how rubbish some politician or celebrity is.  I mean, come on. Are we really interested in this? 

In all the hype about Twitter in some sections of the media, what&#039;s often conveniently skipped over is that Tweets are limited to 140 characters.  Now, what on earth can you say of real news value in such few words?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps I&#8217;m missing something, but I still can&#8217;t see any value in Twitter for journalists. I&#8217;ve scanned dozens of Twitter postings and all I&#8217;ve come across is either people saying they are about to have a cup of coffee/ pick up their dry cleaning/go to Tesco, or commenting on the weather or how rubbish some politician or celebrity is.  I mean, come on. Are we really interested in this? </p>
<p>In all the hype about Twitter in some sections of the media, what&#8217;s often conveniently skipped over is that Tweets are limited to 140 characters.  Now, what on earth can you say of real news value in such few words?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

