<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: PCC and the third party issue</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/pcc-and-the-third-party-issue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/pcc-and-the-third-party-issue/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2012 19:16:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Press Complaints Commission exposed in wake of Jan Moir&#8217;s attack on Stephen Gately</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/pcc-and-the-third-party-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-21123</link>
		<dc:creator>Press Complaints Commission exposed in wake of Jan Moir&#8217;s attack on Stephen Gately</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:59:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15128#comment-21123</guid>
		<description>[...] would be made to the Press Complaints Commission. Nevertheless, the commission was initially reluctant to investigate as its rules prevent it from taking third party complaints, but a convenient loophole appears to [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] would be made to the Press Complaints Commission. Nevertheless, the commission was initially reluctant to investigate as its rules prevent it from taking third party complaints, but a convenient loophole appears to [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Petition the government to make the Press Complaints Commission a public body &#124; The Spicy Cauldron</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/pcc-and-the-third-party-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20754</link>
		<dc:creator>Petition the government to make the Press Complaints Commission a public body &#124; The Spicy Cauldron</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:40:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15128#comment-20754</guid>
		<description>[...] PCC and the third party issue (blogs.journalism.co.uk) [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PCC and the third party issue (blogs.journalism.co.uk) [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: malcolm coles</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/pcc-and-the-third-party-issue/comment-page-1/#comment-20725</link>
		<dc:creator>malcolm coles</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15128#comment-20725</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think we should hold our breath: &quot;PCC will in any case write to the Daily Mail for its response to the more general complaints from the public before considering whether there are any issues under the Code to pursue&quot;

That sounds like it&#039;s kicking it into the long grass to me. It&#039;s on a par with Alex Ferguson&#039;s non-apology to Alan Wiley...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think we should hold our breath: &#8220;PCC will in any case write to the Daily Mail for its response to the more general complaints from the public before considering whether there are any issues under the Code to pursue&#8221;</p>
<p>That sounds like it&#8217;s kicking it into the long grass to me. It&#8217;s on a par with Alex Ferguson&#8217;s non-apology to Alan Wiley&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

