<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Mail Online confirms withdrawal of ads on Moir article; defends free speech</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/mail-online-confirms-withdrawal-of-ads-on-moir-article-defends-free-speech/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/mail-online-confirms-withdrawal-of-ads-on-moir-article-defends-free-speech/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: J Ellis</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/mail-online-confirms-withdrawal-of-ads-on-moir-article-defends-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-20766</link>
		<dc:creator>J Ellis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:09:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15080#comment-20766</guid>
		<description>Free Speech is such a misused term. Freedom of speech means freedom from oppression in a political environment, NOT freedom to be offensive and bigoted and NOT freedom to discriminate and cause distress. That is actually indefensible. An article saying that the death of a young man was linked to a gay man&#039;s lifestyle (whatever a typical gay man&#039;s lifestyle is, or a typical gay man for that matter) without knowing the medical facts can not be thought of by any reasonable person as &#039;a carefully argued article&#039;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Free Speech is such a misused term. Freedom of speech means freedom from oppression in a political environment, NOT freedom to be offensive and bigoted and NOT freedom to discriminate and cause distress. That is actually indefensible. An article saying that the death of a young man was linked to a gay man&#8217;s lifestyle (whatever a typical gay man&#8217;s lifestyle is, or a typical gay man for that matter) without knowing the medical facts can not be thought of by any reasonable person as &#8216;a carefully argued article&#8217;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Comment: The rise of &#8217;smart&#8217; or &#8216;not so smart&#8217; internet mobs and their pressure on the media &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/10/19/mail-online-confirms-withdrawal-of-ads-on-moir-article-defends-free-speech/comment-page-1/#comment-20691</link>
		<dc:creator>Comment: The rise of &#8217;smart&#8217; or &#8216;not so smart&#8217; internet mobs and their pressure on the media &#124; Journalism.co.uk Editors' Blog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:56:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=15080#comment-20691</guid>
		<description>[...] PCC was bounced into contacting Boyzone&#8217;s PR company to see if it wanted to complain. The Mail pulled ads on its website. BBC mentioned the Mail article in its news bulletins on Gately&#8217;s [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] PCC was bounced into contacting Boyzone&#8217;s PR company to see if it wanted to complain. The Mail pulled ads on its website. BBC mentioned the Mail article in its news bulletins on Gately&#8217;s [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

