<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Science journalism needs fewer science writers and more editors, says Goldacre</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/18/science-journalism-needs-fewer-science-writers-and-more-editors-says-goldacre/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/18/science-journalism-needs-fewer-science-writers-and-more-editors-says-goldacre/</link>
	<description>Online journalism news</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 May 2012 14:01:29 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Is science journalism a load of crap? &#171; Shona Ghosh</title>
		<link>http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/2009/09/18/science-journalism-needs-fewer-science-writers-and-more-editors-says-goldacre/comment-page-1/#comment-17894</link>
		<dc:creator>Is science journalism a load of crap? &#171; Shona Ghosh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Sep 2009 11:45:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blogs.journalism.co.uk/editors/?p=14137#comment-17894</guid>
		<description>[...] still, you can read my write up at journalism.co.uk &#8211; and have a look at my Flickr photos if you weren&#8217;t there.  Leave [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] still, you can read my write up at journalism.co.uk &#8211; and have a look at my Flickr photos if you weren&#8217;t there.  Leave [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

